| Literature DB >> 29510701 |
Alinune Nathanael Kabaghe1,2, Michael Give Chipeta3,4,5, Robert Sean McCann3,6, Dianne Jean Terlouw5, Tinashe Tizifa3, Zinenani Truwah7, Kamija Samuel Phiri3, Michèle van Vugt8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of cost effective <span class="Disease">malaria control interventions, such as insecticide-treated bed nets (ITN), diagnosis and effective treatment of malaria, and intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp), the lack of equitable access and coverage affect utilization of these interventions in rural communities. Aggregated rates of access and utilization of malaria interventions in national surveys mask substantial variations in intervention coverage. Utilization of interventions and factors affecting utilization need investigation in rural communities.Entities:
Keywords: Intervention; Malaria; Malawi; Rural communities
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29510701 PMCID: PMC5838945 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2253-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Participants summary characteristics
| Summary characteristic | n (%) | MIS 2014 n* (%) [ |
|---|---|---|
| Households | 1328 | |
| Participants | 2046 | |
| Children | 887 (43.4) | |
| Women | 1159 (56.6) | |
| Highest level of education women ( | N = 2897 | |
| No school | 382 (33.0) | 293 (14.4) |
| Some primary | 590 (51.0) | 1763 (62.6)) |
| Completed primary or some secondary | 137 (11.9) | 742 (20.5) |
| Completed Secondary or further | 47 (4.1) | 99 (2.4) |
| ITN available in household | 722 (35.3) | (70.2) |
ITN insecticide-treated bed net, IQR interquartile range, SD standard deviation
n* The total is included where provided
ITN use, care-seeking, diagnosis and treatment of fever
| Participants | Total | Childrena (%) | Womena (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITN used previous night | 646 (31.6) | 297 (33.5) | 349 (30.2) | 0.104 |
AL artemether–lumefantrine, AMD anti-malarial drug, MK Malawi Kwacha, PHC primary health care facility (provide diagnosis and treatment for malaria)
* χ2; ** t test. Italic p values are statistically significant
aChildren aged 6–59 months and women aged 15–49 months
b8 children were seen at village clinic
cOther anti-malarial drugs were sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine, quinine and artesunate–amodiaquine (second line treatment of uncomplicated malaria)
Fig. 1IPTp-SP in pregnancy. The proportion of women reporting 3 or more doses of IPTp-SP (17.0%) and those with a documented IPTp-SP of 3 or more doses (15.0%) were not different (p = 0.350). ANC antenatal care, CPT cotrimoxazole prophylactic therapy, IPTp-SP intermittent preventive therapy in pregnancy with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine
Fig. 2ITN use, fever and care-seeking for fever by round. There was a difference by sampling round in ITN use (p < 0.001) and reported fever (p < 0.001). There was no difference in treatment seeking for fever by sampling round (p = 0.612)
Factors associated with ITN use, health care-seeking and IPTp-SP in rural Chikwawa
| aOR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|
| ITN use | |
| Participants | |
| Children | Ref |
| Women | 0.84 (0.69–1.00) |
| Wealth | |
| Lowest | Ref |
| Second |
|
| Middle | 1.28 (0.93–1.77) |
| Fourth |
|
| Top | |
| Sampling round | |
| April–May’15 |
|
| June–July’15 |
|
| August–September’15 |
|
| October–November’15 |
|
| January–March’16 |
|
| Household size | 0.98 (0.94–1.03) |
| Sought treatment | |
| Participants | |
| Children | Ref |
| Women |
|
| Wealth | |
| Lowest | Ref |
| Second | 0.85 (0.41–1.76) |
| Middle | 0.87 (0.43–1.75) |
| Fourth | 1.29 (0.64–2.61) |
| Top | 1.67 (0.84–3.32) |
| Sampling round | |
| April–May’15 | Ref |
| June–July’15 | 1.01 (0.60–1.70) |
| August–September’15 | 0.87 (0.47–1.62) |
| October–November’15 | 0.76 (0.35–1.64) |
| January–March’16 | 0.80 (0.37–1.73) |
| Distance to health facility (km) | 1.06 (0.95–1.19) |
| Total people in household | 1.04 (0.92–1.17) |
| 3 or more IPTp-SP doses | |
| Age | 0.997 (0.99–1.00) |
| Education category | |
| None | Ref |
| Some primary | 0.54 (0.28–1.02) |
| Completed primary or some secondary | 0.90 (0.34–2.40) |
| Completed secondary | 0.47 (0.05–4.63) |
| Wealth quintile | |
| Lowest | Ref. |
| Second | 1.75 (0.70–4.41) |
| Middle | 1.26 (0.50–3.17) |
| Fourth | 1.58 (0.64–3.90) |
| Top | 1.47 (0.53–4.09) |
| Distance to health facility (km) | 0.93 (0.79–1.09) |
Italic confidence intervals are statistically significant
aOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval, IPTp-SP intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy with sulfadoxine pyrimethamine