IMPORTANCE: Intermittent preventive therapy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine to control malaria during pregnancy is used in 37 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, and 31 of those countries use the standard 2-dose regimen. However, 2 doses may not provide protection during the last 4 to 10 weeks of pregnancy, a pivotal period for fetal weight gain. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials to determine whether regimens containing 3 or more doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for intermittent preventive therapy during pregnancy are associated with a higher birth weight or lower risk of low birth weight (LBW) (<2500 g) than standard 2-dose regimens. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: ISI Web of Knowledge, EMBASE, SCOPUS, PubMed, LILACS, the Malaria in Pregnancy Library, Cochrane CENTRAL, and trial registries from their inception to December 2012, without language restriction. Eligible studies included randomized and quasi-randomized trials of intermittent preventive therapy during pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine monotherapy. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were independently abstracted by 2 investigators. Relative risk (RR), mean differences, and 95% CIs were calculated with random-effects models. RESULTS: Of 241 screened studies, 7 trials of 6281 pregnancies were included. The median birth weight in the 2-dose group was 2870 g (range, 2722-3239 g) and on average 56 g higher (95% CI, 29-83 g; I2 = 0%) in the ≥3-dose group. Three or more doses were associated with fewer LBW births (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.94; I 2 = 0%), with a median LBW risk per 1000 women in the 2-dose group (assumed control group risk) of 167 per 1000 vs 134 per 1000 in the ≥3-dose group (absolute risk reduction, 33 per 1000 [95% CI, 10-52]; number needed to treat = 31). The association was consistent across a wide range of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance (0% to 96% dihydropteroate-synthase K540E mutations). There was no evidence of small-study bias. The ≥3-dose group had less placental malaria (RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.68; I 2 = 0%, in 6 trials, 63 vs 32 per 1000; absolute risk reduction, 31 per 1000 [95% CI, 20-39]). In primigravid plus secundigravid women, the risk of moderate to severe maternal anemia was lower in the ≥3-dose group (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36-0.99; I2 = 20%; in 6 trials, 36 vs 22 per 1000; absolute risk reduction, 14 per 1000 [95% CI, 0.4-23]). There were no differences in rates of serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa, intermittent preventive therapy with 3 or more doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was associated with a higher birth weight and lower risk of LBW than the standard 2-dose regimens. These data provide support for the new WHO recommendations to provide at least 3 doses of intermittent preventive therapy during pregnancy at each scheduled antenatal care visit in the second and third trimester.
IMPORTANCE: Intermittent preventive therapy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine to control malaria during pregnancy is used in 37 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, and 31 of those countries use the standard 2-dose regimen. However, 2 doses may not provide protection during the last 4 to 10 weeks of pregnancy, a pivotal period for fetal weight gain. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials to determine whether regimens containing 3 or more doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for intermittent preventive therapy during pregnancy are associated with a higher birth weight or lower risk of low birth weight (LBW) (<2500 g) than standard 2-dose regimens. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: ISI Web of Knowledge, EMBASE, SCOPUS, PubMed, LILACS, the Malaria in Pregnancy Library, Cochrane CENTRAL, and trial registries from their inception to December 2012, without language restriction. Eligible studies included randomized and quasi-randomized trials of intermittent preventive therapy during pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine monotherapy. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were independently abstracted by 2 investigators. Relative risk (RR), mean differences, and 95% CIs were calculated with random-effects models. RESULTS: Of 241 screened studies, 7 trials of 6281 pregnancies were included. The median birth weight in the 2-dose group was 2870 g (range, 2722-3239 g) and on average 56 g higher (95% CI, 29-83 g; I2 = 0%) in the ≥3-dose group. Three or more doses were associated with fewer LBW births (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.94; I 2 = 0%), with a median LBW risk per 1000 women in the 2-dose group (assumed control group risk) of 167 per 1000 vs 134 per 1000 in the ≥3-dose group (absolute risk reduction, 33 per 1000 [95% CI, 10-52]; number needed to treat = 31). The association was consistent across a wide range of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance (0% to 96% dihydropteroate-synthase K540E mutations). There was no evidence of small-study bias. The ≥3-dose group had less placental malaria (RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.68; I 2 = 0%, in 6 trials, 63 vs 32 per 1000; absolute risk reduction, 31 per 1000 [95% CI, 20-39]). In primigravid plus secundigravid women, the risk of moderate to severe maternal anemia was lower in the ≥3-dose group (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36-0.99; I2 = 20%; in 6 trials, 36 vs 22 per 1000; absolute risk reduction, 14 per 1000 [95% CI, 0.4-23]). There were no differences in rates of serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa, intermittent preventive therapy with 3 or more doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was associated with a higher birth weight and lower risk of LBW than the standard 2-dose regimens. These data provide support for the new WHO recommendations to provide at least 3 doses of intermittent preventive therapy during pregnancy at each scheduled antenatal care visit in the second and third trimester.
Authors: Jessica T Lin; Bernard Mbewe; Steve M Taylor; Mari Luntamo; Steven R Meshnick; Per Ashorn Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Mari Luntamo; Anne-Maria Rantala; Steven R Meshnick; Yin Bun Cheung; Teija Kulmala; Kenneth Maleta; Per Ashorn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nnaemeka C Iriemenam; Monica Shah; Wangeci Gatei; Anna M van Eijk; John Ayisi; Simon Kariuki; Jodi Vanden Eng; Simon O Owino; Ashima A Lal; Yusuf O Omosun; Kephas Otieno; Meghna Desai; Feiko O ter Kuile; Bernard Nahlen; Julie Moore; Mary J Hamel; Peter Ouma; Laurence Slutsker; Ya Ping Shi Journal: Malar J Date: 2012-07-04 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Anna M van Eijk; Jenny Hill; Sue Povall; Alison Reynolds; Helen Wong; Feiko O Ter Kuile Journal: Malar J Date: 2012-10-30 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Richard J Pearce; Hirva Pota; Marie-Solange B Evehe; El-Hadj Bâ; Ghyslain Mombo-Ngoma; Allen L Malisa; Rosalynn Ord; Walter Inojosa; Alexandre Matondo; Diadier A Diallo; Wilfred Mbacham; Ingrid V van den Broek; Todd D Swarthout; Asefaw Getachew; Seyoum Dejene; Martin P Grobusch; Fanta Njie; Samuel Dunyo; Margaret Kweku; Seth Owusu-Agyei; Daniel Chandramohan; Maryline Bonnet; Jean-Paul Guthmann; Sian Clarke; Karen I Barnes; Elizabeth Streat; Stark T Katokele; Petrina Uusiku; Chris O Agboghoroma; Olufunmilayo Y Elegba; Badara Cissé; Ishraga E A-Elbasit; Hayder A Giha; S Patrick Kachur; Caroline Lynch; John B Rwakimari; Pascalina Chanda; Moonga Hawela; Brian Sharp; Inbarani Naidoo; Cally Roper Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-04-14 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Julie Gutman; Linda Kalilani; Steve Taylor; Zhiyong Zhou; Ryan E Wiegand; Kyaw L Thwai; Dyson Mwandama; Carole Khairallah; Mwayi Madanitsa; Ebbie Chaluluka; Fraction Dzinjalamala; Doreen Ali; Don P Mathanga; Jacek Skarbinski; Ya Ping Shi; Steve Meshnick; Feiko O ter Kuile Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Julie Gutman; Dyson Mwandama; Ryan E Wiegand; Doreen Ali; Don P Mathanga; Jacek Skarbinski Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2013-06-24 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Meghna Desai; Julie Gutman; Anne L'lanziva; Kephas Otieno; Elizabeth Juma; Simon Kariuki; Peter Ouma; Vincent Were; Kayla Laserson; Abraham Katana; John Williamson; Feiko O ter Kuile Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Elizabeth M McClure; Steven R Meshnick; Noam Lazebnik; Peter Mungai; Christopher L King; Michael Hudgens; Robert L Goldenberg; Anna-Maria Siega-Riz; Arlene E Dent Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Verner N Orish; Onyekachi S Onyeabor; Johnson N Boampong; Richmond Afoakwah; Ekene Nwaefuna; Samuel Acquah; Adekunle O Sanyaolu; Nnaemeka C Iriemenam Journal: Afr Health Sci Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 0.927
Authors: Enesia Banda Chaponda; R Matthew Chico; Jane Bruce; Charles Michelo; Bellington Vwalika; Sungano Mharakurwa; Mike Chaponda; James Chipeta; Daniel Chandramohan Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Nyanyiwe M Mbeye; Feiko O ter Kuile; Mary-Ann Davies; Kamija S Phiri; Matthias Egger; Gilles Wandeler Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 2.622