| Literature DB >> 22340941 |
Godfrey M Mubyazi1, Paul Bloch, Jens Byskov, Pascal Magnussen, Ib C Bygbjerg, Kristian S Hansen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since its introduction in the national antenatal care (ANC) system in Tanzania in 2001, little evidence is documented regarding the motivation and performance of health workers (HWs) in the provision of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy (IPTp) services in the national ANC clinics and the implications such motivation and performance might have had on HWs and services' compliance with the recommended IPTp delivery guidelines. This paper describes the supply-related drivers of motivation and performance of HWs in administering IPTp doses among other ANC services delivered in public and private health facilities (HFs) in Tanzania, using a case study of Mkuranga and Mufindi districts.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22340941 PMCID: PMC3298537 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-48
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Bivariate regression analysis of statistical association between the place of work of health workers (the dependent variable)) and their satisfaction with staffing conditions (the independent variables).
| Independent variables | Frequency | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Satisfied with the number of NOs | 12 (15.4%) | 0.397 | 1.83 | 0.45-7.40 |
| 2. Satisfied with the number of public health nurses | 3 (3.8%) | 0.925 | 1.13 | 0.09-12.99 |
| 3. Satisfied with the number of COs | 23 (29.5%) | 0.034 | 3.68 | 1.10-12.24 |
| 4. Satisfied with the number of laboratory staff | 9 (11.5%) | 0.006 | 0.05 | 0.01-0.43 |
| 5. Satisfied with the number of MCHA | 4 (5.1%) | 0.551 | 0.54 | 0.07-4.07 |
The number and percentage of HW confirming their satisfaction is presented in the "Frequency" column (N = 78). The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are calculated for health workers employed at a public/government HF at the time of the interview. HWsfound at a private HF serve as the reference group. Data are combined for the two target districts
Bivariate regression analysis on statistical associations between the perceived motivation of frontline HWs and nine independent variables.
| Dependent variable: "Do you personally feel | Frequency | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| comfortable or satisfied with the working | ||||
| conditions in your current work?" | ||||
| 1. Working at a government HF | 50 (64.1%) | 1.59 | 0.523 | 0.39-6.54 |
| 2. Being a CO | 21 (26.9%) | 1.02 | 0.977 | 0.24-4.28 |
| 3. Being a trained or qualified nurse (i.e. nurse midwive, PHN or NO) | 19 (24.4%) | .65 | 0.609 | 0.13-3.33 |
| 4. Being a medical attendant or a MCHA | 36 (46.2%) | 1.48 | 0.549 | 0.41-5.33 |
| 5. Having received training in fANC | 47 (60.3%) | .76 | 0.677 | 0.21-2.75 |
| 6. Having received specific training on IPTp services | 36 (46.2%) | .68 | 0.549 | 0.19-2.43 |
| 7. Knowing the criteria used in the selection of staff for IPTp training | 31 (39.7%) | 2.02 | 0.285 | 0.56-7.29 |
| 8. Having been promoted within the last three years | 20 (25.6%) | 2.89 | 0.115 | 0.77-10.79 |
| 9. Knowing the criteria used in the promotion of HW | 42 (53.9%) | 2.59 | 0.186 | 0.63-10.61 |
"Frequency" indicates the number of "yes" answers to the independent variables. Data are combined for both districts (N = 78). OR is the odds ratio while CI is the confidence interval. The p-values are indicated just for easy noting of the statistical significance of the differences tested/shown (cf. Chapter 4)
Bivariate regression analysis of statistical association between the place of work of HWs (dependent variable) and their satisfaction with various working conditions (the predictor variables).
| 1. Satisfied with the availability and condition of residential houses for HWs | 14 (17.9%) | 0.001 | 0.09 | 0.02-0.39 |
| 2. Satisfied with the physical condition of the buildings of the HFas a whole | 31 (39.7%) | 0.368 | 0.65 | 0.25-1.66 |
| 3. Satisfied with the availability and condition of furniture at the HF as a whole | 23 (29.5%) | 0.004 | 0.22 | 0.08-0.62 |
| 4. Satisfied with the availability and condition of furniture specifically at the ANC clinic | 27 (34.6%) | 0.001 | 0.16 | 0.06-0.45 |
| 5. Satisfied with the number and condition of consultation rooms at the HF as a whole | 9 (11.5%) | 0.865 | 1.14 | 0.26-4.94 |
| 6. Satisfied with the number and condition of toilets for use by staff and clients around the HF | 40 (51.3%) | 0.088 | 0.44 | 0.02-1.13 |
| 7. Satisfied with the physical condition of the laboratory at the HF | 17 (21.8%) | 0.030 | 0.29 | 0.09-0.89 |
| 8. Satisfied with the availability of essential laboratory supplies at the HF | 30 (38.5%) | 0.120 | 0.47 | 0.18-1.22 |
| 9. Satisfied with the availability and condition of drug storage facilities at the HF | 42 (53.9%) | 0.169 | 0.51 | 0.19-1.33 |
| 10. Satisfied with the availability of water at the HF | 31 (39.7%) | 0.021 | 0.32 | 0.12-0.84 |
| 11. Satisfied with the availability and reliability of electricity at the HF | 24 (30.8%) | 0.028 | 0.32 | 0.12-0.88 |
| 12. Satisfied with the availability of cups for practicing DOT at the ANC clinic | 29 (37.2%) | < 0.001 | 0.09 | 0.03-0.26 |
| 13. Satisfied with the availability of SP for IPTp services at the HF/ANC clinic | 49 (62.8%) | 0.100 | 0.42 | 0.15-1.18 |
| 14. Satisfied with the availability of antipyretics at the HF/ANC clinic | 36 (46.2%) | 0.056 | 0.39 | 0.15-1.02 |
The number and percentage of HWs confirming their satisfaction is presented in the "Frequency" column (N = 78). The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are calculated for the HWs employed at a public/government HF at the time of the interview. HWs at a private HF serve as the reference group. Data are combined for the two target districts