Literature DB >> 29509970

Acuros CTS: A fast, linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for computed tomography scatter - Part I: Core algorithms and validation.

Alexander Maslowski1, Adam Wang1, Mingshan Sun1, Todd Wareing1, Ian Davis1, Josh Star-Lack1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe Acuros® CTS, a new software tool for rapidly and accurately estimating scatter in x-ray projection images by deterministically solving the linear Boltzmann transport equation (LBTE).
METHODS: The LBTE describes the behavior of particles as they interact with an object across spatial, energy, and directional (propagation) domains. Acuros CTS deterministically solves the LBTE by modeling photon transport associated with an x-ray projection in three main steps: (a) Ray tracing photons from the x-ray source into the object where they experience their first scattering event and form scattering sources. (b) Propagating photons from their first scattering sources across the object in all directions to form second scattering sources, then repeating this process until all high-order scattering sources are computed using the source iteration method. (c) Ray-tracing photons from scattering sources within the object to the detector, accounting for the detector's energy and anti-scatter grid responses. To make this process computationally tractable, a combination of analytical and discrete methods is applied. The three domains are discretized using the Linear Discontinuous Finite Elements, Multigroup, and Discrete Ordinates methods, respectively, which confer the ability to maintain the accuracy of a continuous solution. Furthermore, through the implementation in CUDA, we sought to exploit the parallel computing capabilities of graphics processing units (GPUs) to achieve the speeds required for clinical utilization. Acuros CTS was validated against Geant4 Monte Carlo simulations using two digital phantoms: (a) a water phantom containing lung, air, and bone inserts (WLAB phantom) and (b) a pelvis phantom derived from a clinical CT dataset. For these studies, we modeled the TrueBeam® (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) kV imaging system with a source energy of 125 kVp. The imager comprised a 600 μm-thick Cesium Iodide (CsI) scintillator and a 10:1 one-dimensional anti-scatter grid. For the WLAB studies, the full-fan geometry without a bowtie filter was used (with and without the anti-scatter grid). For the pelvis phantom studies, a half-fan geometry with bowtie was used (with the anti-scatter grid). Scattered and primary photon fluences and energies deposited in the detector were recorded.
RESULTS: The Acuros CTS and Monte Carlo results demonstrated excellent agreement. For the WLAB studies, the average percent difference between the Monte Carlo- and Acuros-generated scattered photon fluences at the face of the detector was -0.7%. After including the detector response, the average percent differences between the Monte Carlo- and Acuros-generated scatter fractions (SF) were -0.1% without the grid and 0.6% with the grid. For the digital pelvis simulation, the Monte Carlo- and Acuros-generated SFs agreed to within 0.1% on average, despite the scatter-to-primary ratios (SPRs) being as high as 5.5. The Acuros CTS computation time for each scatter image was ~1 s using a single GPU.
CONCLUSIONS: Acuros CTS enables a fast and accurate calculation of scatter images by deterministically solving the LBTE thus offering a computationally attractive alternative to Monte Carlo methods. Part II describes the application of Acuros CTS to scatter correction of CBCT scans on the TrueBeam system.
© 2018 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo; cone-beam CT; deterministic calculation; discrete ordinates; finite element; scatter

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29509970      PMCID: PMC5948176          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  56 in total

1.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter.

Authors:  J H Siewerdsen; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice.

Authors:  William C Scarfe; Allan G Farman; Predag Sukovic
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Scatter correction for cone-beam CT in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Lei Zhu; Yaoqin Xie; Jing Wang; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Scatter correction method for x-ray CT using primary modulation: phantom studies.

Authors:  Hewei Gao; Rebecca Fahrig; N Robert Bennett; Mingshan Sun; Josh Star-Lack; Lei Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Dosimetric accuracy of a deterministic radiation transport based (192)Ir brachytherapy treatment planning system. Part III. Comparison to Monte Carlo simulation in voxelized anatomical computational models.

Authors:  K Zourari; E Pantelis; A Moutsatsos; L Sakelliou; E Georgiou; P Karaiskos; P Papagiannis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Scatter estimation for a digital radiographic system using convolution filtering.

Authors:  L A Love; R A Kruger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Dosimetric impact of an 192Ir brachytherapy source cable length modeled using a grid-based Boltzmann transport equation solver.

Authors:  Justin K Mikell; Firas Mourtada
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Prism representation: a 3D ray-tracing algorithm for radiotherapy applications.

Authors:  R L Siddon
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Patient-specific scatter correction for flat-panel detector-based cone-beam CT imaging.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Stephen Brunner; Kai Niu; Sebastian Schafer; Kevin Royalty; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Implementation of an efficient Monte Carlo calculation for CBCT scatter correction: phantom study.

Authors:  Peter G F Watson; Ernesto Mainegra-Hing; Nada Tomic; Jan Seuntjens
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  7 in total

1.  Validation of a deterministic linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for rapid CT dose computation using physical dose measurements in pediatric phantoms.

Authors:  Sara Principi; Yonggang Lu; Yu Liu; Adam Wang; Alex Maslowski; Todd Wareing; John Van Heteren; Taly Gilat Schmidt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A Comparison Study Between CNN-Based Deformed Planning CT and CycleGAN-Based Synthetic CT Methods for Improving iCBCT Image Quality.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Yankui Chang; Yongguang Liang; Zhiqun Wang; Xi Pei; Xie George Xu; Jie Qiu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Deterministic linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for patient-specific CT dose estimation: Comparison against a Monte Carlo benchmark for realistic scanner configurations and patient models.

Authors:  Sara Principi; Adam Wang; Alexander Maslowski; Todd Wareing; Petr Jordan; Taly Gilat Schmidt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Reference dataset for benchmarking fetal doses derived from Monte Carlo simulations of CT exams.

Authors:  Anthony J Hardy; Maryam Bostani; Erin Angel; Chris Cagnon; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Improvements in CBCT Image Quality Using a Novel Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm: A Clinical Evaluation.

Authors:  Stephen J Gardner; Weihua Mao; Chang Liu; Ibrahim Aref; Mohamed Elshaikh; Joon K Lee; Deepak Pradhan; Benjamin Movsas; Indrin J Chetty; Farzan Siddiqui
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-01-10

6.  Evaluation and Clinical Application of a Commercially Available Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for CBCT-Based IGRT.

Authors:  Weihua Mao; Chang Liu; Stephen J Gardner; Farzan Siddiqui; Karen C Snyder; Akila Kumarasiri; Bo Zhao; Joshua Kim; Ning Winston Wen; Benjamin Movsas; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-01

7.  Please Place Your Seat in the Full Upright Position: A Technical Framework for Landing Upright Radiation Therapy in the 21st Century.

Authors:  Sarah Hegarty; Nicholas Hardcastle; James Korte; Tomas Kron; Sarah Everitt; Sulman Rahim; Fiona Hegi-Johnson; Rick Franich
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.