| Literature DB >> 29509779 |
Franco Tassi1,2, Stefano Fazi3, Simona Rossetti3, Paolo Pratesi1, Marco Ceccotti3, Jacopo Cabassi1,2, Francesco Capecchiacci1, Stefania Venturi1,2, Orlando Vaselli1,2.
Abstract
Volcanic lakesEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29509779 PMCID: PMC5839588 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193914
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Schematic map of the Campi Flegrei caldera with the location of Lake Averno.
This Figure is similar but not identical to the original image, and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.
Fig 2Vertical profiles along the Lake Averno water column of (a) water temperature (°C), (b) pH, (c) electrical conductivity (EC, in mS/cm), and (d) dissolved O2 (mg/L).
Sampling depth (m), temperature (°C), pH, salinity (expressed as TDS, in mg/L) alkalinity (alk, in mg/L) and chemical composition (in mg/L) of the main solutes, reduced sulfur species and trace elements in water samples from Lake Averno.
The δ13C-TDIC (in ‰ vs. V-PDB), δD-H2O (in ‰ vs. V-SMOW) and δ18O-H2O (in ‰ vs. V-SMOW) values are also reported.
| depth | T | pH | alk | F- | Cl- | Br- | P | NO3- | SO42- | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | Na+ | K+ |
| 0 | 26.6 | 9.29 | 403 | 10.7 | 549 | 1.5 | <0.0005 | 0.24 | 200 | 18 | 16 | 512 | 65 |
| 2 | 26.6 | 9.28 | 395 | 9.8 | 546 | 1.5 | <0.0005 | 0.12 | 202 | 17 | 15 | 521 | 66 |
| 4 | 24.3 | 9.14 | 413 | 10.1 | 537 | 1.5 | <0.0005 | 0.11 | 197 | 17 | 12 | 502 | 68 |
| 6 | 15.0 | 8.53 | 417 | 9.89 | 535 | 1.5 | <0.0005 | 0.072 | 195 | 24 | 13 | 484 | 57 |
| 8 | 11.7 | 7.83 | 427 | 10.6 | 540 | 1.5 | <0.0005 | 0.24 | 194 | 26 | 12 | 483 | 51 |
| 10 | 11.2 | 7.82 | 429 | 10.5 | 548 | 1.5 | <0.0005 | 1.1 | 194 | 30 | 14 | 483 | 55 |
| 12 | 11.3 | 7.81 | 419 | 9.64 | 536 | 1.6 | <0.0005 | 1.2 | 195 | 29 | 13 | 490 | 50 |
| 14 | 10.9 | 7.80 | 419 | 10.3 | 542 | 1.6 | <0.0005 | 0.38 | 197 | 31 | 13 | 474 | 53 |
| 16 | 10.8 | 7.78 | 416 | 10.5 | 539 | 2.0 | <0.0005 | 0.27 | 195 | 30 | 13 | 479 | 52 |
| 18 | 10.7 | 7.67 | 415 | 10.1 | 541 | 1.5 | <0.0005 | 0.082 | 195 | 32 | 14 | 482 | 52 |
| 20 | 10.7 | 7.53 | 411 | 10.0 | 550 | 1.6 | 0.001 | 0.38 | 197 | 32 | 14 | 485 | 55 |
| 22 | 10.8 | 7.38 | 426 | 9.94 | 567 | 1.5 | 0.002 | 0.35 | 199 | 36 | 14 | 499 | 56 |
| 24 | 10.8 | 7.23 | 460 | 10.1 | 592 | 1.6 | 0.004 | 0.17 | 203 | 40 | 17 | 510 | 57 |
| 26 | 10.9 | 7.12 | 586 | 9.74 | 632 | 1.8 | 0.009 | 0.16 | 195 | 49 | 18 | 550 | 57 |
| 28 | 10.9 | 7.02 | 676 | 9.90 | 680 | 1.8 | 0.014 | 0.13 | 197 | 59 | 19 | 576 | 62 |
| 30 | 10.9 | 6.97 | 761 | 10.0 | 706 | 2.0 | 0.018 | 0.16 | 191 | 63 | 20 | 592 | 64 |
| 32 | 11.0 | 6.89 | 814 | 10.2 | 730 | 2.1 | 0.021 | 0.11 | 191 | 70 | 22 | 622 | 66 |
| 34 | 10.8 | 6.73 | 944 | 10.7 | 783 | 2.2 | 0.031 | 0.07 | 185 | 83 | 27 | 645 | 72 |
| depth | NH4+ | Li+ | ΣS2- | Fetot | Mn | Zn | TDS | δ13C-TDICcalc | δ13C-TDIC | δD-H2O | δ18O-H2O | ||
| 0 | 2.2 | 0.72 | 0.011 | <0.0005 | 0.0063 | 1,779 | -2.91 | -13.08 | -1.35 | ||||
| 2 | 2.3 | 0.76 | 0.41 | 0.0056 | <0.0005 | 0.0062 | 1,777 | -2.78 | -12.58 | -1.28 | |||
| 4 | 1.9 | 0.61 | 0.0027 | <0.0005 | 0.0028 | 1,761 | -2.95 | -12.07 | -1.07 | ||||
| 6 | 2.3 | 0.56 | 0.87 | 0.015 | 0.0011 | 0.0030 | 1,740 | -2.9 | -3.02 | -12.55 | -1.05 | ||
| 8 | 1.7 | 0.55 | 0.0012 | 0.0045 | 0.012 | 1,748 | -2.9 | -3.11 | -12.71 | -1.14 | |||
| 10 | 1.5 | 0.48 | 2.5 | 0.00031 | 0.017 | 0.0022 | 1,770 | -3.8 | -3.56 | -12.39 | -1.15 | ||
| 12 | 2.3 | 0.58 | 0.00029 | 0.0036 | 0.0013 | 1,747 | -3.4 | -4.11 | -12.11 | -1.11 | |||
| 14 | 2.4 | 0.72 | 2.7 | 0.00025 | 0.0084 | 0.0017 | 1,747 | -2.8 | -4.39 | -11.54 | -1.05 | ||
| 16 | 1.6 | 0.69 | 0.00027 | 0.031 | 0.0013 | 1,739 | -3.0 | -4.87 | -11.89 | -1.19 | |||
| 18 | 3.8 | 0.47 | 4.6 | 0.00083 | 0.10 | 0.0014 | 1,753 | -1.7 | -5.06 | -12.41 | -1.12 | ||
| 20 | 3.9 | 0.66 | 7.9 | 0.010 | 0.41 | 0.0031 | 1,768 | -4.6 | -4.91 | -12.08 | -1.25 | ||
| 22 | 4.3 | 0.73 | 8.3 | 0.028 | 0.59 | 0.0004 | 1,821 | -3.6 | -4.11 | -12.63 | -1.22 | ||
| 24 | 7.7 | 0.85 | 0.036 | 0.59 | 0.021 | 1,899 | -3.6 | -4.25 | -11.85 | -1.31 | |||
| 26 | 13 | 0.62 | 8.5 | 0.041 | 0.52 | 0.0022 | 2,121 | -2.9 | -3.61 | -12.12 | -1.14 | ||
| 28 | 16 | 0.82 | 0.036 | 0.45 | 0.0024 | 2,297 | -1.9 | -3.66 | -12.57 | -1.19 | |||
| 30 | 22 | 0.51 | 13 | 0.034 | 0.42 | 0.0011 | 2,445 | -4.2 | -3.51 | -13.05 | -1.07 | ||
| 32 | 25 | 0.60 | 13 | 0.031 | 0.40 | 0.0010 | 2,565 | -1.4 | -4.85 | -12.01 | -1.26 | ||
| 34 | 36 | 0.45 | 18 | 0.055 | 0.41 | 0.0038 | 2,805 | -2.2 | -5.08 | -11.53 | -1.11 |
Fig 3Vertical profiles along the Lake Averno water column of (a) P, Fe and Mn concentrations, (b) ΣS2-/SO42- and NH4+/NO3- ratios, and (c) δ13C-CH4 values (‰ vs. V-PDB) and CO2 and CH4 partial pressures (atm).
Sampling depth (m) and chemical composition (in atm) of the main dissolved gases in samples from Lake Averno.
The isotopic composition of dissolved CO2 (δ13C-CO2, in ‰ vs. V-PDB) and CH4 (δ13C-CH4 and δD-CH4, in ‰ vs. V-PDB and ‰ vs. V-SMOW, respectively), and the PCO2 values expected at equilibrium with alkalinity (PCO2calc, in atm) are also reported.
| depth | pTOT | δ13C(CO2) | δ13C(CH4) | δD(CH4) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.000026 | 0.76 | 0.0090 | 0.14 | 0.000005 | 0.90 | 0.00018 | |||||
| 2 | 0.000030 | 0.74 | 0.0085 | 0.14 | 0.000005 | 0.88 | 0.00018 | |||||
| 4 | 0.000082 | 0.72 | 0.0085 | 0.16 | 0.000006 | 0.88 | 0.00027 | |||||
| 6 | 0.00013 | 0.62 | 0.0073 | 0.20 | 0.000008 | 0.83 | -11.9 | 0.0014 | ||||
| 8 | 0.00028 | 0.60 | 0.0069 | 0.22 | 0.000005 | 0.82 | -12.3 | 0.0077 | ||||
| 10 | 0.00070 | 0.57 | 0.0066 | 0.000026 | 0.13 | 0.000008 | 0.71 | -13.2 | -50.7 | 0.0080 | ||
| 12 | 0.0014 | 0.57 | 0.0065 | 0.00029 | 0.029 | 0.000010 | 0.60 | -12.8 | -53.1 | -267 | 0.0080 | |
| 14 | 0.0047 | 0.57 | 0.0066 | 0.00073 | 0.00023 | 0.000007 | 0.58 | -12.0 | -53.6 | -271 | 0.0083 | |
| 16 | 0.0048 | 0.56 | 0.0065 | 0.0016 | 0.00058 | 0.000015 | 0.57 | -12.2 | -54.1 | -269 | 0.0086 | |
| 18 | 0.0075 | 0.56 | 0.0063 | 0.0045 | 0.00092 | 0.000020 | 0.69 | -10.6 | -54.7 | -272 | 0.011 | |
| 20 | 0.010 | 0.57 | 0.0065 | 0.024 | 0.0013 | 0.000020 | 0.67 | -13.3 | -56.9 | -275 | 0.015 | |
| 22 | 0.015 | 0.56 | 0.0064 | 0.052 | 0.0022 | 0.000027 | 0.64 | -12.1 | -58.1 | -270 | 0.022 | |
| 24 | 0.025 | 0.57 | 0.0063 | 0.10 | 0.0033 | 0.000037 | 0.70 | -11.5 | -59.5 | -269 | 0.034 | |
| 26 | 0.030 | 0.57 | 0.0065 | 0.19 | 0.0054 | 0.000052 | 0.80 | -10.9 | -62.2 | -275 | 0.055 | |
| 28 | 0.053 | 0.58 | 0.0063 | 0.30 | 0.0073 | 0.000062 | 0.94 | -9.2 | -63.4 | -272 | 0.079 | |
| 30 | 0.065 | 0.58 | 0.0062 | 0.47 | 0.0075 | 0.000065 | 1.12 | -11.3 | -65.2 | -268 | 0.100 | |
| 32 | 0.085 | 0.58 | 0.0062 | 0.50 | 0.010 | 0.000077 | 1.18 | -8.2 | -65.1 | -271 | 0.13 | |
| 34 | 0.093 | 0.59 | 0.0061 | 0.64 | 0.013 | 0.000095 | 1.33 | -9.1 | -65.4 | -269 | 0.21 |
Fig 4Vertical microbiological profiles along the Lake Averno water column estimated by CARD-FISH.
(a) archaea and bacteria (cell ml-1); (b) Proteobacteria (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Epsilonproteobacteria), Bacteroidetes-Flavobacteria (cf) and autofluorescent cells (expressed as % of total bacteria).
Fig 5Relative abundance of the 40 most abundant bacterial genera along the Lake Averno water column.
(A) Data are normalized to percent of total OTUs. (B) Table cells are colored (gradient scale from blue to red) according to the relative abundances. The abundance of each genus was normalized with respect to the average abundance. Hence, this allowed visualization of the relative increase or decrease in abundance of each genus at the 8 sampling depths, despite the differences in abundance between genera. In addition, the genera were clustered (the y-axis) to visualize by different shades of color those with similar patterns. Each group have both a broad group name (Phylum) and a specific name (Genus). If no genus name could be assigned, the best assignment is reported.
Fig 6Relationships between environmental variables (chemical parameters and dissolved gases) and taxonomic composition, considering the 40 most abundant bacterial genera in the samples across sites.
Nonmetric MultiDimensional Scaling (NMDS) ordination plot represents the typifying microbial composition in the transition from the surface to deep waters. Stress value indicates the significant concordance between the distance among samples in the NMDS plot and the actual Bray-Curtis distance among samples. Each dot represents the microbial community at a specific depth. Distance between the sample dots signifies similarity; the closer the samples are, the more similar microbial composition they have. The chemical parameters were incorporated in the NMDS analysis with a vector-fitting procedure.
Fig 7Schematic conceptual model of the interactions between microbial populations and geochemical parameters at different depth in Lake Averno.
Fig 8(a): Vertical profile of water density (in g/cm3), calculated using data measured in 2015 in Eq (2) (black line), compared to that computed assuming T = 7°C ([26]; red line) and T = 10°C (blue line) in the epilimnion. At the latter temperature, the density of epilimnetic water is higher than that measured at >8 m depth. (b): Vertical profile of water density (in g/cm3), calculated using data measured in 2015 in Eq (2) (black line), compared to that resulting from changes in the concentrations of dissolved CH4 and CO2 (considering CH4×20 and CO2 = 0; green line). The dashed arrows show the decrease of the water density at ≥20 m depth. (c): Vertical profiles of Ptot of dissolved gases (in atm) in February and October 2005 ([26]; magenta and light blue lines, respectively), September 2010 ([31]; green line) and June 2015 (this paper, black line), compared with that of the hydrostatic pressure (black straight line). The vertical profile of Ptot of dissolved gases in June 2015 assuming PCH4×20 (see Fig 8B) is also reported (grey line).