Literature DB >> 29508240

Eigenfactor score and alternative bibliometrics surpass the impact factor in a 2-years ahead annual-citation calculation: a linear mixed design model analysis of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging journals.

Ernesto Roldan-Valadez1, Ulises Orbe-Arteaga2, Camilo Rios3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Because we believe the journal selection before a manuscript submission deserves further investigation in each medical specialty, we aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of seven bibliometrics in the Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging category of the Web of Knowledge to calculate total citations over a 7-year period.
METHODS: A linear mixed effects design using random slopes and intercepts were performed on bibliometrics corresponding to 124 journals from 2007 to 2011, with their corresponding citations from 2009 to 2013, which appeared in the Journal Citations Report Science Edition.
RESULTS: The Eigenfactor Score, Article Influence Score, Cited Half-life, 5-years impact factor and Number of Articles are significant predictors of 2-year-ahead total citations (p ≤ 0.010 for all variables). The impact factor and Immediacy Index are not significant predictors. There was a significant global effect size (R2 = 0.934; p < 0.001), which yielded a total variance of 93.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support researchers' decision to stop the misuse of IF alone to evaluate journals. Radiologists and other researchers should review journal's bibliometrics for their decision-making during the manuscript submission phase. A re-ranking of journals using Eigenfactor Score, Article Influence Score, and Cited Half-life provides a better assessment of their significance and importance in particular disciplines.

Keywords:  Algorithms; Bibliometrics; Citation; Impact factor; Predictive value; Self-evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29508240     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-018-0870-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  35 in total

1.  The most influential journals: Impact Factor and Eigenfactor.

Authors:  Alan Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Impact factor--a useful tool, but not for all purposes.

Authors:  Christopher Baethge
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  The impact factor: a useful indicator of journal quality or fatally flawed?

Authors:  David B Elliott
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Alternative bibliometrics from impact factor improved the esteem of a journal in a 2-year-ahead annual-citation calculation: multivariate analysis of gastroenterology and hepatology journals.

Authors:  Ernesto Roldan-Valadez; Camilo Rios
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.566

5.  Spurious alternative impact factors: The scale of the problem from an academic perspective.

Authors:  Fredy R S Gutierrez; Jeffrey Beall; Diego A Forero
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Impact factor of a scientific journal: Is it a measure of quality of research?

Authors:  A Shanta; A S Pradhan; S D Sharma
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2013-10

7.  Ranking scientific publications: the effect of nonlinearity.

Authors:  Liyang Yao; Tian Wei; An Zeng; Ying Fan; Zengru Di
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The level of non-citation of articles within a journal as a measure of quality: a comparison to the impact factor.

Authors:  Andy R Weale; Mick Bailey; Paul A Lear
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  Causes for the persistence of impact factor mania.

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 7.867

10.  Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations.

Authors:  Mohit Sharma; Anurag Sarin; Priyanka Gupta; Shobhit Sachdeva; Ankur V Desai
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-05
View more
  9 in total

1.  Impact factor correlations with Scimago Journal Rank, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, Eigenfactor Score, and the CiteScore in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging journals.

Authors:  Moises Villaseñor-Almaraz; Juan Islas-Serrano; Chiharu Murata; Ernesto Roldan-Valadez
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics.

Authors:  Ernesto Roldan-Valadez; Shirley Yoselin Salazar-Ruiz; Rafael Ibarra-Contreras; Camilo Rios
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 3.  The impact of the open-access status on journal indices: a review of medical journals.

Authors:  Saif Aldeen AlRyalat; Mohammad Saleh; Mohammad Alaqraa; Alaa Alfukaha; Yara Alkayed; Maryann Abaza; Hadeel Abu Saa; Mohamed Alshamiry
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-03-07

Review 4.  Applications of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins in Dentistry: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Paras Ahmad; Elena Della Bella; Martin J Stoddart
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Endodontic Microbiology: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 50 Classics.

Authors:  Mohmed Isaqali Karobari; Manahil Maqbool; Paras Ahmad; Muqthadir Siddiqui Mohammed Abdul; Anand Marya; Adith Venugopal; Gul Muhammad Shaik; Giuseppe Alessandro Scardina; Pietro Messina; Tahir Yusuf Noorani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Why was this cited? Explainable machine learning applied to COVID-19 research literature.

Authors:  Lucie Beranová; Marcin P Joachimiak; Tomáš Kliegr; Gollam Rabby; Vilém Sklenák
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 3.801

7.  Ranking of addiction journals in eight widely used impact metrics.

Authors:  Dennis M Gorman; Chuck Huber
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 7.772

8.  The top 100 most impactful articles on the anterior cruciate ligament: An altmetric analysis of online media.

Authors:  Matthew D Civilette; William R Rate; Brett D Haislup; Andrew S Cohen; Lyn Camire; Blake M Bodendorfer; Heath P Gould
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-07-30

9.  Impact factor JUMPS after the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective study in Dermatology journals.

Authors:  Leslie-Marisol González-Hermosillo; Ernesto Roldan-Valadez
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 2.089

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.