Literature DB >> 25191134

Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations.

Mohit Sharma1, Anurag Sarin1, Priyanka Gupta2, Shobhit Sachdeva3, Ankur V Desai4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25191134      PMCID: PMC4150161          DOI: 10.4103/1450-1147.139151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Nucl Med        ISSN: 1450-1147


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, The impact factor (IF) is frequently used as an indicator of the importance of a journal to its field. It was first introduced by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information.[1] Although IF is widely used by institutions and clinicians, people have widespread misconception regarding the method for calculating the journal IF, its significance and how it can be utilized. The IF of a journal is not associated to the factors like quality of peer review process and quality of content of the journal, but is a measure that reflects the average number of citations to articles published in journals, books, thesis, project reports, newspapers, conference/seminar proceedings, documents published in internet, notes, and any other approved documents (by Indian Council of Medical Research or similar body).[2] Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones.[3] According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.”[4] Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. Impact factor can be calculated after completing the minimum of 3 years of publication; for that reason journal IF cannot be calculated for new journals. The journal with the highest IF is the one that published the most commonly cited articles over a 2-year period. The IF applies only to journals, not to individual articles or individual scientists unlike the “H-index.” The relative number of citations an individual article receives is better evaluated as “citation impact.” In a given year, the IF of a journal is the average number of citations received per article published in that journal during the 2 preceding years. IFs are calculated each year by Thomson scientific for those journals that it indexes, and are published in Journal Citation Reports (http://www.thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science_products/a-z/journal_citation_reports/). For example, if a journal has an IF of 3 in 2008, then its papers published in 2006 and 2007 received three citations each on average in 2008. The 2008 IFs are actually published in 2009; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2008 publications have been processed by the indexing agency (Thomson Reuters). The IF for the biomedical journals may range up to 5-8%.[5] The IF of any journal may be calculated by the formula; 2012 impactfactor =A/B Where A is the number of times articles published in 2010 and 2011 were cited by indexed journals during 2012. B is the total number of citable items like articles and reviews published by that journal in 2010 and 2011. The calculation of IF for the journal where in a person has published articles is a contentious issue. Nevertheless, this have been already warned; “misuse in evaluating individuals” because there is “a wide variation from article to article within a single journal” therefore, “In an ideal world, evaluators would read each article and make personal judgments,” said by Eugene Garfield.[1]
  4 in total

Review 1.  The intricacies of impact factor and mid-term review of editorship.

Authors:  M Malathi; Devinder Mohan Thappa
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.

Authors:  Eugene Garfield
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  How can impact factors be improved?

Authors:  E Garfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-17

4.  Show me the data.

Authors:  Mike Rossner; Heather Van Epps; Emma Hill
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 10.539

  4 in total
  10 in total

1.  Impact factor correlations with Scimago Journal Rank, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, Eigenfactor Score, and the CiteScore in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging journals.

Authors:  Moises Villaseñor-Almaraz; Juan Islas-Serrano; Chiharu Murata; Ernesto Roldan-Valadez
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Eigenfactor score and alternative bibliometrics surpass the impact factor in a 2-years ahead annual-citation calculation: a linear mixed design model analysis of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging journals.

Authors:  Ernesto Roldan-Valadez; Ulises Orbe-Arteaga; Camilo Rios
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Exercise for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research From 2001 to 2021.

Authors:  Yulin Dong; Linman Weng; Yinhu Hu; Yuxing Mao; Yajuan Zhang; Zefeng Lu; Tingting Shi; Renren Du; Wu Wang; Jinyan Wang; Xueqiang Wang
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 5.702

4.  Randomized Controlled Trials of Mindfulness and Acceptance-Based Interventions Over the Past Two Decades: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Kristen M Kraemer; Jiaxuan Lyu; Gloria Y Yeh
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.579

5.  Changing landscape of nutrition and dietetics research? A bibliographic analysis of top-tier published research in 1998 and 2018.

Authors:  Sze Lin Yoong; Jacklyn Jackson; Courtney Barnes; Nicole Pearson; Taren Swindle; Sharleen O'Reilly; Rachel Tabak; Regina Belski; Alison Brown; Rachel Sutherland
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 6.  The gender and geography of publishing: a review of sex/gender reporting and author representation in leading general medical and global health journals.

Authors:  Rebekah Merriman; Ilaria Galizia; Sonja Tanaka; Ashley Sheffel; Kent Buse; Sarah Hawkes
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-05

7.  Oman's COVID-19 publication trends: A cross-sectional bibliometric study.

Authors:  Hasina Al Harthi; Jehan Al Fannah; Faryal Khamis; Safa Al Hasmi; Badrya Al Siabi; Abeer Al Habsi; Abdallah Al Muniri; Qasem Al Salmi; Salah Al Awaidy
Journal:  Public Health Pract (Oxf)       Date:  2022-08-23

8.  Commentary: Paradigm shift in scientometric indices and publication policies of various ophthalmology journals.

Authors:  Bharat Gurnani; Kirandeep Kaur; Tapesh Nag
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.969

9.  Mapping the global research landscape on insulin resistance: Visualization and bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Sa'ed H Zyoud; Muna Shakhshir; Amer Koni; Amani S Abushanab; Moyad Shahwan; Ammar Abdulrahman Jairoun; Rand Al Subu; Adham Abu Taha; Samah W Al-Jabi
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2022-09-15

10.  Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis in Spine Surgery-How Good Are They in Methodological Quality? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Muthu Sathish; Ramakrishnan Eswar
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-02-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.