Literature DB >> 25533428

Alternative bibliometrics from impact factor improved the esteem of a journal in a 2-year-ahead annual-citation calculation: multivariate analysis of gastroenterology and hepatology journals.

Ernesto Roldan-Valadez1, Camilo Rios.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A deeper understanding of supplementary bibliometrics beyond the impact factor might provide researchers with a better understanding of the citation process. This study presents a multivariate analysis of gastroenterology and hepatology journals to evaluate the predictive ability of seven bibliometrics in the Web of Science to calculate total cites over a 2-year period.
METHODS: Coincidentally, bibliometrics appearing during 2008, 2009, and 2010, with their corresponding cites in 2010, 2011, and 2012, were recorded from the Journal Citation Reports Science Edition. A linear mixed-effects design using random slopes and intercepts was performed on 51 out of 74 journals in the Gastroenterology and Hepatology category. RESULT: There was a significant global effect size (R(2) = 0.992; P < 0.001), which yielded a total variance of 99.2%. The strongest predictors in the model were the Eigenfactor Score and Cited Half-life (P < 0.001), followed by the Number of Articles (P = 0.011) and the Immediacy Index (P = 0.021). The impact factor was not a significant predictor.
CONCLUSION: The Eigenfactor Score and Cited Half-life predictors might be the new standards to assess the influence and importance of scientific journals; this approach may help researchers select journals in which to publish their work.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25533428     DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  5 in total

1.  Impact factor correlations with Scimago Journal Rank, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, Eigenfactor Score, and the CiteScore in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging journals.

Authors:  Moises Villaseñor-Almaraz; Juan Islas-Serrano; Chiharu Murata; Ernesto Roldan-Valadez
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics.

Authors:  Ernesto Roldan-Valadez; Shirley Yoselin Salazar-Ruiz; Rafael Ibarra-Contreras; Camilo Rios
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Eigenfactor score and alternative bibliometrics surpass the impact factor in a 2-years ahead annual-citation calculation: a linear mixed design model analysis of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging journals.

Authors:  Ernesto Roldan-Valadez; Ulises Orbe-Arteaga; Camilo Rios
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  The top 100 most impactful articles on the anterior cruciate ligament: An altmetric analysis of online media.

Authors:  Matthew D Civilette; William R Rate; Brett D Haislup; Andrew S Cohen; Lyn Camire; Blake M Bodendorfer; Heath P Gould
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-07-30

5.  Impact factor JUMPS after the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective study in Dermatology journals.

Authors:  Leslie-Marisol González-Hermosillo; Ernesto Roldan-Valadez
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 2.089

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.