Literature DB >> 15496665

Dynamic sound localization during rapid eye-head gaze shifts.

Joyce Vliegen1, Tom J Van Grootel, A John Van Opstal.   

Abstract

Human sound localization relies on implicit head-centered acoustic cues. However, to create a stable and accurate representation of sounds despite intervening head movements, the acoustic input should be continuously combined with feedback signals about changes in head orientation. Alternatively, the auditory target coordinates could be updated in advance by using either the preprogrammed gaze-motor command or the sensory target coordinates to which the intervening gaze shift is made ("predictive remapping"). So far, previous experiments cannot dissociate these alternatives. Here, we study whether the auditory system compensates for ongoing saccadic eye and head movements in two dimensions that occur during target presentation. In this case, the system has to deal with dynamic changes of the acoustic cues as well as with rapid changes in relative eye and head orientation that cannot be preprogrammed by the audiomotor system. We performed visual-auditory double-step experiments in two dimensions in which a brief sound burst was presented while subjects made a saccadic eye-head gaze shift toward a previously flashed visual target. Our results show that localization responses under these dynamic conditions remain accurate. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the intervening eye and head movements are fully accounted for. Moreover, elevation response components were more accurate for longer-duration sounds (50 msec) than for extremely brief sounds (3 msec), for all localization conditions. Taken together, these results cannot be explained by a predictive remapping scheme. Rather, we conclude that the human auditory system adequately processes dynamically varying acoustic cues that result from self-initiated rapid head movements to construct a stable representation of the target in world coordinates. This signal is subsequently used to program accurate eye and head localization responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15496665      PMCID: PMC6730098          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2671-04.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  30 in total

1.  Influence of static eye and head position on tone-evoked gaze shifts.

Authors:  Tom J Van Grootel; Marc M Van Wanrooij; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effects of self-motion on auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Hirohito M Kondo; Daniel Pressnitzer; Iwaki Toshima; Makio Kashino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Dynamic circuitry for updating spatial representations. III. From neurons to behavior.

Authors:  Rebecca A Berman; Laura M Heiser; Catherine A Dunn; Richard C Saunders; Carol L Colby
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Fusion of visual and auditory stimuli during saccades: a Bayesian explanation for perisaccadic distortions.

Authors:  Paola Binda; Aurelio Bruno; David C Burr; Maria C Morrone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The vestibulo-auricular reflex.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Janet L Ruhland; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Differential influence of attention on gaze and head movements.

Authors:  Aarlenne Z Khan; Gunnar Blohm; Robert M McPeek; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Gaze shifts to auditory and visual stimuli in cats.

Authors:  Janet L Ruhland; Tom C T Yin; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-08

8.  Compression of auditory space during rapid head turns.

Authors:  Johahn Leung; David Alais; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Spatial constancy mechanisms in motor control.

Authors:  W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Target modality determines eye-head coordination in nonhuman primates: implications for gaze control.

Authors:  Luis C Populin; Abigail Z Rajala
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.