Literature DB >> 28079775

Association of Hospital Volume With Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Treatment.

Shitanshu Uppal1, Christina Chapman, Ryan J Spencer, Shruti Jolly, Kate Maturen, J Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Marcela G delCarmen, Laurel W Rice.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate racial-ethnic disparities in guideline-based care in locally advanced cervical cancer and their relationship to hospital case volume.
METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, we performed a retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 with locally advanced squamous or adenocarcinoma of the cervix undergoing definitive primary radiation therapy. The primary outcome was the race-ethnicity-based rates of adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-based care. The secondary outcome was the effect of guideline-based care on overall survival. Multivariable models and propensity matching were used to compare the hospital risk-adjusted rates of guideline-based adherence and overall survival based on hospital case volume.
RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 16,195 patients. The rate of guideline-based care was 58.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 57.4-59.4%) for non-Hispanic white, 53% (95% CI 51.4-54.9%) for non-Hispanic black, and 51.5% (95% CI 49.4-53.7%) for Hispanic women (P<.001). From 2004 to 2012, the rate of guideline-based care increased from 49.5% (95% CI 47.1-51.9%) to 59.1% (95% CI 56.9-61.2%) (Ptrend<.001). Based on a propensity score-matched analysis, patients receiving guideline-based care had a lower risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.62-0.68). Compared with low-volume hospitals, the increase in adherence to guideline-based care in high-volume hospitals was 48-63% for non-Hispanic white, 47-53% for non-Hispanic black, and 41-54% for Hispanic women.
CONCLUSION: Racial and ethnic disparities in the delivery of guideline-based care are the highest in high-volume hospitals. Guideline-based care in locally advanced cervical cancer is associated with improved survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28079775     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Impact of hospital volume on racial disparities and outcomes for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ama Buskwofie; Yongmei Huang; Ana I Tergas; June Y Hou; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Basic social resource needs screening in the gynecologic oncology clinic: a quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Anna Louise Beavis; Awa Sanneh; Rebecca L Stone; Margaret Vitale; Kimberly Levinson; Anne F Rositch; Amanda Nickles Fader; Kristin Topel; Ashley Abing; Stephanie L Wethington
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Healthcare Disparities in Gynecologic Oncology.

Authors:  Allison Grubbs; Emma L Barber; Dario R Roque
Journal:  Adv Oncol       Date:  2022-05-04

4.  Sociodemographic characteristics and cervical cancer survival in different regions of the United States: a National Cancer Database study.

Authors:  Michael D Toboni; Alexander Cohen; Zachary L Gentry; Stuart A Ostby; Zhixin Wang; Sejong Bae; Charles Leath
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.661

Review 5.  Too many women are dying from cervix cancer: Problems and solutions.

Authors:  David K Gaffney; Mia Hashibe; Deanna Kepka; Kathryn A Maurer; Theresa L Werner
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 5.482

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.