Literature DB >> 29505143

Malnutrition Identified by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Consensus Criteria and Other Bedside Tools Is Highly Prevalent in a Sample of Individuals Undergoing Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer.

Urvashi Mulasi1, David M Vock2, Adam J Kuchnia1, Gautam Jha3, Naomi Fujioka3, Venkatesh Rudrapatna4, Manish R Patel3, Levi Teigen1, Carrie P Earthman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Using the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (Academy/ASPEN) Consensus malnutrition definition, we estimated malnutrition prevalence in a sample of individuals with head and neck cancer (HNC) and compared it with the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA). We also investigated the utility of the 50-kHz phase angle (PA) and 200-kHz/5-kHz impedance ratio (IR) to identify malnutrition.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen individuals (18 males, 1 female) scheduled to undergo chemoradiotherapy were seen at 5 time points during and up to 3 months after treatment completion. Multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis, PG-SGA, nutrition-focused physical examination, anthropometry, dietary intake, and handgrip strength data were collected.
RESULTS: Using the Consensus, 67% were found to be malnourished before treatment initiation; these criteria diagnosed malnutrition with overall good sensitivity (94%) and moderate specificity (43%) compared with PG-SGA. Over all pooled observations, "malnourished" (by Consensus but not PG-SGA category) had a lower mean PA (5.2 vs 5.9; P = .03) and higher IR (0.82 vs 0.79; P = .03) than "well-nourished" categorizations, although the clinical relevance of these findings is unclear. PA and IR were correlated with higher PG-SGA score (r = -0.35, r = 0.36; P < .01) and handgrip strength (r = 0.48, r = -0.47; P < .01).
CONCLUSION: The Academy/ASPEN Consensus and the PG-SGA were in good agreement. It is unclear whether PA and IR can be used as surrogate markers of nutrition status or muscle loss.
© 2016 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioimpedance; head and neck cancer; malnutrition; nutrition; nutrition assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29505143     DOI: 10.1177/0148607116672264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr        ISSN: 0148-6071            Impact factor:   4.016


  9 in total

1.  Dentition, nutritional status and adequacy of dietary intake in treatment naïve head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Catherine Kubrak; Arazam Farhangfar; Matthew Woynorowski; Naresh Jha; William Preshing; Vickie Baracos
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-03-31

2.  Changes in Nutrition Impact Symptoms, Nutritional and Functional Status during Head and Neck Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  May Kay Neoh; Zalina Abu Zaid; Zulfitri Azuan Mat Daud; Nor Baizura Md Yusop; Zuriati Ibrahim; Zuwariah Abdul Rahman; Norshariza Jamhuri
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Validation of the efficacy of the NUTRISCORE for the nutritional screening of cancer patients in China.

Authors:  Junren Kang; Hailong Li; Xiaodong Shi; Enling Ma; Wei Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Inflammation Status and Body Composition Predict Two-Year Mortality of Patients with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma under Provision of Recommended Energy Intake during Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Yu-Ching Lin; Cheng-Hsu Wang; Hang Huong Ling; Yi-Ping Pan; Pei-Hung Chang; Wen-Chi Chou; Fang-Ping Chen; Kun-Yun Yeh
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-02-06

Review 5.  Pathophysiology of cachexia and characteristics of dysphagia in chronic diseases.

Authors:  Haruyo Matsuo; Kunihiro Sakuma
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2022-07-22

6.  Pretreatment Glasgow Prognostic Score Correlated with Serum Histidine Level and Three-Year Mortality of Patients with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Optimal Performance Status.

Authors:  Kun-Yun Yeh; Chao-Hung Wang; Hang Huong Ling; Chia-Lin Peng; Zih-Syuan Chen; Simon Hsia
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 6.706

7.  Prognostic Value of Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio in Patients with Oral Cavity Cancer.

Authors:  Chien-An Ko; Ku-Hao Fang; Ming-Shao Tsai; Yi-Chan Lee; Chia-Hsuan Lai; Cheng-Ming Hsu; Ethan I Huang; Geng-He Chang; Yao-Te Tsai
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  Longitudinal Body Composition Changes and the Importance of Fat-Free Mass Index in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Huiping Ding; Shengjin Dou; Yiqun Ling; Guopei Zhu; Qiong Wang; Yan Wu; Yong Qian
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 3.279

Review 9.  The Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) Approach and Quality of Care.

Authors:  Miren Taberna; Francisco Gil Moncayo; Enric Jané-Salas; Maite Antonio; Lorena Arribas; Esther Vilajosana; Elisabet Peralvez Torres; Ricard Mesía
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.