Marc Escribà-Gelonch1, Timothy Noël1, Volker Hessel1. 1. Micro Flow Chemistry and Process Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Herewith a new process concept for synthesis is presented which combines both UV-photoirradiation and high-p,T intensification (photo-high-p,T) in continuous flow. The application of this procedure to Vitamin D3 synthesis promotes thermal shifting of the equilibrium from the reaction intermediate to the product. This is enabled by microreactors which allow operation under harsh conditions such as the high temperature used here. This provides, to our best knowledge, a new kind of process combination (novel process window). As a result, in less than 1 min, 42% conversion of 7-dehydrocholesterol can be achieved giving a 17% yield and 40% selectivity of Vitamin D3. This approach enhances productivity by up to 2 orders of magnitude compared with the current capillary based vitamin D3 synthesis, because, under the microflow conditions, photochemistry can be performed at fairly high concentration and up to 20 times faster.
Herewith a new process concept for synthesis is presented which combines both UV-photoirradiation and high-p,T intensification (photo-high-p,T) in continuous flow. The application of this procedure to Vitamin D3 synthesis promotes thermal shifting of the equilibrium from the reaction intermediate to the product. This is enabled by microreactors which allow operation under harsh conditions such as the high temperature used here. This provides, to our best knowledge, a new kind of process combination (novel process window). As a result, in less than 1 min, 42% conversion of 7-dehydrocholesterol can be achieved giving a 17% yield and 40% selectivity of Vitamin D3. This approach enhances productivity by up to 2 orders of magnitude compared with the current capillary based vitamin D3 synthesis, because, under the microflow conditions, photochemistry can be performed at fairly high concentration and up to 20 times faster.
Recently, the FDA[1] as a regulatory authority
pushed the manufacturers of the pharmaceutical and food industry (e.g.,
Novartis-MIT[2]) to promote use of continuous
end-to-end processing. In a research environment, the use of microreactors
and flow chemistry is an essential part of this goal, since they have
proved the possibility to combine high pressure (p) and high temperatures
(T) in a high-p,T fashion. This tandem gives the chance to achieve
process intensification which derives in shorter reaction times.[3] Such chemical intensification is part of novel
process windows (NPW).[4,5]Following NPW, in this paper
a fully continuous process intensification
for the synthesis of Vitamin D3 (VD3) is proposed. Therefore,
the coupling of NPW with photochemistry gives the concept of photo-high-p,T
intensification. The complex chemical synthesis of VD3 starts with
7-dehydrocholesterol (7DHC), commonly known as provitamin D, industrially
produced from cholesterol obtained from the skin of animals. The irradiation
of 7DHC with UV-B light most efficiently in the range 275–300
nm[6] (Scheme ) gives a bond rearrangement resulting in an electrocyclic
ring opening (Previtamin D), followed by an antarafacial [1,7] sigmatropic
hydrogen rearrangement.[7] Dauben et al.[8] suggested that the VD3 productivity actually
does not depend on the 7DHC excitation wavelength, but on P3’s.
Yet, in the first step, the reversible ring closure can also give
the 7DHC isomer Lumisterol (L3),[9] but with
low provability with high photon energy.[8] In the second, the rearrangement of previtamin D (P3) can give VD3
as a result in an equilibrium shifted thermally.[7] Unfortunately, the process must be stopped after short
irradiations because of the synthesis of tachysterol (T3),[10] which has a more favorable quantum yield in
this stage.[6] In addition, the conformation
of P3 can also influence the equilibrium toward T3.[9] Besides T3, long irradiations can also give toxisterols.[9,11] Therefore, transferring the process into continuous flow means a
short irradiation and high pressure in a temperature-dependent matter.
Scheme 1
Chemical Synthesis and Most Accepted Mechanistic Pathway for Vitamin
D3
In the current production
of VD3, a solution of 7DHC in diethyl
ether is shortly photoactivated up to 10% conversion using a high-pressure
or medium-pressure mercury lamp in a quartz-made recirculation reactor,[12,13] where the upper temperature limit is strictly limited for photoreactions.
Thompson[14] stated that the use of higher
temperatures (than ambient, >20 °C) shifts the equilibrium
toward
higher amounts of P3, i.e. higher 7DHC conversion. From an initial
solution at room temperature of 93:7 P3:VD3, after an equilibrium
of just 30 min at 100 °C, the P3:VD3 isomeric proportion became
72:28. Vice versa, processing at temperatures below
20 °C can lead to the formation of side products (L3 and T3),
and the portion of the latter increases with prolonged light exposure
so that the net result is low reaction selectivity as well. From an
industrial point of view, severe safety constraints are given due
to the high photoenergy introduced and the highly reactive intermediates
generated. The synthesis using the photoactivation of 7DHC is thus
kept separate from the following isomerization to VD3 at medium temperature.
Accordingly, the combined use of high light energy, pressure, and
temperatures (photo-high-p,T) is not established and probably would
be prohibited when using conventional equipment. This new kind of
NPW is, however, made possible using photomicroreactors, and a major
key is the much higher light penetration[15,16] due to the miniature characteristic dimension.[17] Microreactors are known to allow safe operation under classical
harmful process conditions[18,19] and to achieve with
all their process benefits a good sustainability profile.[20,21]In this scenario, VD3 could be an ideal candidate, since it
is
known to be one of the most thermally stable vitamins.[22,23] In addition, operating under pressure has been demonstrated to be
an efficient way to increase the VD3 productivity at room temperature.[24] Therefore, the combination of irradiation, pressure,
and temperature in one photoreactor is a new approach to achieve control
over the side product formation, while boosting conversion. The latter
is also promoted by the high light penetration, common in microflow
reactors, which allows operation at high concentrations close to solubility
limits. Thus, finally the approach presented might be a new means
to increase the productivity of vitamin D3. Moreover, the
advantageous surface-to-volume ratio of microflow reactors together
with using modern lamps[25] allow both the
photon transmission and energy efficiency to increase.To date,
very few continuous flow studies related to the synthesis
of VD3 have been reported and none applying photo-high-p,T and NPW
principles.[26,27] Fuse et al.[28,29] described a continuous process for the production of 1α,25-(OH)2-vitamin D3 operating in two steps. A first irradiation
of a mixture of 7DHC analogues at 313–578 nm (high-pressure
mercury lamp) achieved a mixture of VD3 analogues, which was irradiated
again in a second step with 360 nm light at 100 °C. The flow
rate was 0.3–0.6 mL·h–1 for a solution
of a 0.03 M 7DHC analogue mixture at atmospheric pressure. The process
gave a 28% yield of 1,25-(OH)2-VD3 with a productivity
of 1.9 mg/h and a residence time of 15 min. Other studies in UV-microflow[30,31] chemistry have been described successfully related to UV-photo Claisen
rearrangement,[32] or for isomerization of
cyclooctene derivatives,[33] using also inline
packed bed reactors and operating at atmospheric pressure. Continuous-flow
photochemistry with microreactors has been used in organic synthesis,
material science, and water treatment.[34] Nevertheless, the need for UV-light for VD3 synthesis makes the
use of quartz essential.Inspired by these examples, a photo-high-p,T
setup was developed
with the capability of operating together, but during short times
as demanded by VD3 chemistry, with high pressure, temperature, and
irradiation conditions in a safe mode in one step, i.e. using the
advantages common to microprocess engineering.[35] The setup allows operation at a reaction temperature above
a solvent’s boiling point (super heating), which is known to
reduce the reaction time of a purely thermal reaction by several orders
of magnitude compared with batch synthesis.[36] Due to the dangerous properties of ether peroxides generated by
diethyl ether at high temperatures, in this study tert-butyl methyl ether (t-BME) is used to minimize
as much as possible these inconveniences because of steric hindrance.
The formation of tert-butyl radicals as a result
of thermal and UV-irradiation is minimized due to the short residence
times, and the absence of interfering compounds and oxygen inside
the microchannels, which gives t-BME supplementary
UV-stability.[37,38]
Material
and Methods
In order to perform experiments in a small statistically
relevant
fashion, three reaction variables were taken into account: temperature,
concentration, and irradiation time. For each variable, at least three
levels were considered, and each experiment was carried out at least
three times. The levels of each variable are described in the corresponding
section.For each experiment, a solution of the desired concentration
of
7DHC (>90% Cayman Chemical Company) in t-BME (99%
Alfa Aesar) was pumped using an ISCO pump (100D series). All chemicals
were used as received. The pressure was monitored by the pressure
sensor of the ISCO pump. IDEX PEEK Ora 0.55 mm (1/16″) ID tubing
and the corresponding fittings were used for the connections. Quartz
(HOQ: 90% transparency at 280 nm) coil 0.5 mm ID and 3.2 mm ED was
used in the thermally controlled (photo-high-p,T) irradiation chamber
(Scheme ) made of
reflective aluminum in order to enhance internal reflections and therefore
the irradiation from all sides of the coil. A Phillips HOK 4/120 mercury
lamp was used to produce light energy during the reaction, which was
carried out at different temperatures above the boiling point of the
solvent (55 °C). The spectrum of the lamp is provided in Figure . The HOK lamp was
placed on one side, 6 mm out of the reactor. The light reflection
was previously evaluated (Zemax simulation) to ensure that all sections
of the quartz coil received the same light energy. In order to achieve
such intensification, the system was pressurized at 34 bar (33.5 atm)
using a back pressure regulator IDEX BPR (PEEK). Once irradiated at
high temperature and high pressure at the same time, the temperature
was rapidly lowered, taking advantage of the high heat transfer provided
by the capillary reactors. The sampling was carried out on ice using
Supelco 7 mL clear vials, with screw caps and PTFE liners. All samples
were stored at −20 °C in a nitrogen atmosphere for 1 h
before HPLC analysis. The latter was carried out using HPLC (Shimadzu
UFLC-XR) with a GraceSmart RP 18 5u column (150 mm × 4.6 mm),
using cholesterol (95% Alfa Aesar) as the internal standard (IS),
100% acetonitrile (99% Merck) as the mobile phase, and a UV–visible
Shimadzu diode array detector (RID-10A). The whole absorption spectra
are shown in Figure . In these conditions all peaks were clearly separated. The retention
time as well as UV–vis spectra were used for identification
(Figure ): for VD3,
characteristic peaks at 213 and 264 nm were found (Figure a). For 7DHC, the peaks were
at 272 and 282 nm (Figure b). Standards of 7DHC and VD3 (Alfa Aesar 95%) were used for
quantification at 190 nm, quantifying the side products together as
the difference according to sampling.
Scheme 2
Design View of the
Photochemical and Thermal Microflow System
Figure 1
Full spectrum of Phillips HOK 4/120 mercury lamp (provided by Phillips).
Figure 2
Absorption spectra of most of compounds involved.
Figure 3
Absorption spectra of VD3 (a) and 7DHC (b).
Full spectrum of Phillips HOK 4/120 mercury lamp (provided by Phillips).Absorption spectra of most of compounds involved.Absorption spectra of VD3 (a) and 7DHC (b).
Results and Discussion
Effect of Temperature
A set of temperatures
above the boiling point of the solvent were checked between 80 and
260 °C. Despite the fact that temperatures can easily affect
vitamins, cholecalcipherol (VD3) is known for its thermal resistance.[39] In addition, flow chemistry allows work to be
undertaken under anoxic conditions, which enhances the resistance
of these compounds even more since the oxidation risk is avoided.
Hence, in order to ensure 7DHC stability under the harsh conditions
in continuous flow, a high-p,T test was previously done without using
light energy. In this case, the decrease of 7DHC and the existence
of other peaks was evaluated. As shown in Figure , losses of 7DHC are relevant only above
200 °C. Also some important changes in the range between 240
and 260 °C were found. This could suggest a critical stability
point for 7DHC in this range. These differences are also more important
with longer thermal residence times (TRT). In order to ensure the
operating temperature in the irradiation chamber, when needed, a dark
preheating step was also introduced in the setup before the irradiation
chamber (Scheme ).
The irradiation time (IT) then only refers to one part of the TRT,
which is longer. In this connection, Table shows the equivalence between TRT and IT
in the range from 43 to 300 s. It is important to note at this point
that VD3 was not detected in any of these experiments. Thus, and as
expected, photoactivation is strictly needed.
Figure 4
Decomposition of 7DHC at different temperatures
and different residence
times.
Scheme 3
Correlation between
Irradiation Times and Thermal Residence Time
(BPR = Back Pressure Regulator)
Table 1
Correlation between Irradiation Times
and Thermal Residence Time
Irradiation time (s)
Thermal residence
time (s)
43
100
120
280
300
728
Decomposition of 7DHC at different temperatures
and different residence
times.After the stability test, the
reaction was carried out using a
UV-lamp with 400 W power. As this mainly refers to heating power and
unavoidably heats up anything within close distance, this was used
also to maintain the temperature in the irradiation chamber. The additional
heating by the oven then guaranteed achieving the desired temperature.
The temperature was controlled with three thermocouples located in
the irradiation chamber. The energy supplied by the UV-lamp accordingly
reduces the energy demand of the oven, which results in lower energy
in the preheating (dark) part of the setup. Here, the desired temperature
was reached only in the last sections of the preheating, reducing
the thermal stress of 7DHC.Figure shows the
evolution of the reaction at different temperatures with different
irradiation times using a 0.05 M solution of 7DHC in t-BME as starting material. In light of these results, apparently
no relevant reaction is detected below 100 °C. Yet, Figure shows that, with
the same irradiation time, a temperature effect is given, which is
seen to be synergistic together with the irradiation. Furthermore,
the behavior of the reaction is different above and below 200 °C.
Above this temperature and at almost stable 7DHC conversion, the amount
of VD3 decreases at the expense of increasingly formed side compounds,
which include P3, L3, T3, and also otherwise decomposed 7DHC. This
phenomenon may be caused by VD3 decomposition or a shift in the equilibrium
of the VD3 synthesis, enhancing the amount of P3 and probably the
amount of T3 and L3 as well. This is not observed below 200 °C
where, despite lower conversions and lower yield, more control over
side products is given. Yet, note that side product formation is inherent
to the reaction because of the intermediate P3.
Figure 5
Effect of the temperature
on the 7DHC conversion and the VD3 yield
operating at 34 bar with (a) 43 s, (b) 2 min, and (c) 5 min irradiation
time.
Effect of the temperature
on the 7DHC conversion and the VD3 yield
operating at 34 bar with (a) 43 s, (b) 2 min, and (c) 5 min irradiation
time.The maximum conversions achieved
are in the range 40–80%,
depending on the irradiation time, with a maximum yield of VD3 around
20–25%. It should be stressed that such conversions and yields
are reached with really short times by using the photo-high-p,T microflow
setup. Below 160 °C, the difference in the amount of side compounds
between 2 and 5 min irradiation times can be explained because of
the amount of P3. Yet, since P3 is the reaction intermediate, a high
increase of P3 is expected derived from photoactivation in the first
steps. Simultaneously with the P3 synthesis, isomerization also occurs,
and therefore P3 is balanced between synthesis and isomerization.
According to Figure , the maximum of P3 is around 2 min IT. Yet, after a 5 min IT, the
higher yield of VD3 under the same conditions confirms that thermal
isomerization is also carried out. The results of Figure also suggest that, at temperatures
above 200 °C, both the kinetics of side compounds and the decomposition
of 7DHC and VD3 give lower VD3 yields, making the reaction inefficient.
The latter can only be controlled by reducing the IT (43 s), but assuming
at the same time a reduction in both conversion and yield. However,
the unreacted and unaltered 7DHC and P3 can be recycled after a 43
s IT.
Effect of Concentration
The solubility
limit of 7DHC in t-BME was experimentally determined
and found to be 0.22 M (84.5 mg/mL) at room temperature. Thus, the
concentration used in the experiments was set equal to or lower than
this value. The solubility of all other isomers involved in the reaction
is much higher than the one obtained for 7DHC. Hence, for this variable,
three levels were fixed: low (0.05 M), medium (0.11 M), and high (0.22
M). The goal of this study is to unveil the influence of the concentration
of the initial 7DHC on the reaction yield. This could be correlated
with the effect of the concentration in the light transfer according
to the Lambert–Beer law (L–B). Following L–B,
the higher the concentration, the lower should be the transmittance
of 7DHC solution. Nevertheless, a negligible effect of the concentration
was found and the effect using different concentrations was very similar.
For these experiments, a 3.2 mm external diameter and 0.5 mm internal
diameter capillary was used. Therefore, as expected by the excellent
light penetration in the quartz made microcapillaries (transparency
above 90% at 280 nm according to the supplier), there are even at
high concentration enough photons for reaction at any place within
the capillary. Also use of reflective aluminum in the internal part
of the irradiation chamber favored internal reflections and therefore
efficient irradiation on all sides. Thus, conversion is almost invariant
with concentration. Yet, all reactions involved (including side ones)
are intramolecular and thus hardly any dilution effect was to be expected.
This conclusion is important in terms of productivity, since it allows
operating with the highest concentration possible. Following this,
and taking into account (i) the checked concentrations (0.05, 0.01,
and 0.22 M), (ii) the mean of the VD3 yields for each case, (iii)
the corresponding flow rate according to the length of the capillary
tested for each IT (20, 7.12, and 2.67 mL/h respectively), and (iv)
a 90% VD3 recovery in the purification step, the productivity results
in Table . Besides
the highest productivity of the 43 s IT capillary, Table shows that operating with the
described continuous photo-high-p,T setup, is possible to produce
at least in the order of tens of millions of tablets (considering
15 μg VD3/tablet) per year using photo-high-p,T with just one
coil as described in this paper. In addition, especially operating
with the shortest IT, 7DHC and P3 can be recycled, and therefore converted
to VD3 (recycling in not considered in Table ). Comparing these results with previous
literature (Fuse et al.,[28] 1.9 mg/h productivity
with 15 min residence time), photo-high-p,T intensification of VD3
synthesis leads to 40 times better productivity with the lowest concentration
(0.05 M), and 178 times better productivity with the highest concentration
(0.22 M). Despite Fuse et al.[28] referred
to calcitriol (a more unstable derivative) instead of VD3, the productivity
of VD3 with the configuration described here is 1 and even 2 orders
of magnitude better than the process reported before. Also the residence
time is 20 times shorter than comparable continuous setups.
Table 2
Estimation of Annual Average VD3 Productivity
of a Single Capillary Using Photo-high-p,T Setup
Productivity
7DHC [M]
7DHC [mg/h]
IT [s]
[mg/h]
[g/day]
[g/month]
[kg/year]
Tablets/year [millions]
0.05
384
43
69
1.7
50
0.6
40
137
120
32
0.8
23
0.3
18
51
300
9
0.2
7
0.1
5
0.11
845
43
152
3.6
109
1.3
88
301
120
70
1.7
51
0.6
41
113
300
20
0.5
15
0.2
12
0.22
1690
43
304
7.3
219
2.6
175
601
120
141
3.4
101
1.2
81
226
300
41
1.0
29
0.4
23
Taking Table as
a reference and considering our process design, an outlook for the
scaling up of the vitamin synthesis is proposed in Figure . Quartz tubing is enlarged
to mm-scale (by a factor of 10 possibly) and favorably uses gas–liquid
segmented flow.[40] The thin liquid layers
around the gas bubbles preserve the original characteristic dimensions
of the microflow used in this study (own results to be published),
while the characteristic dimensions of the whole segmented flow can
be in the meso range giving already per capillary much enlarged throughput.
Those tubing are still placed in parallel manner to further enlarge
the throughput, surrounded and illuminated from a slightly separated,
to avoid direct contact, reflecting a hot aluminum surface which has
semicircular shape. This multitube configuration is suitable for be
numbering up as suggested in Figure , yet the degree of numbering up is probably exaggerated
(for reasons of being generic). For pharma-scale applications it might
be enough to have one lamp and possibly 10 parallel channels. In between,
UV lamps are placed quartz-jacketed in order to isolate them from
overheating.
Figure 6
Outlook of the scaling up procedure for medium scale production.
Outlook of the scaling up procedure for medium scale production.
Effect
of Irradiation Time (IT)
Flow
chemistry and NPW[41] are known for its capability
to reduce by orders of magnitude the residence times by intensifying
the reaction kinetics.[36] Here, the residence
time (irradiation time) is arranged simply by changing the flow rate
of the solution through the reactor. Hence three levels of this factor
are considered: 43 s, 2 min, and 5 min. Figure a shows a comparative view of the effect
of irradiation time on VD3 yield at different temperatures using in
all cases the same concentration (0.05 M). Apparently, the VD3 yield
increases below 200 °C and decreases above this temperature.
This is mainly because of (i) 7DHC and VD3 decomposition and (ii)
because thermal equilibrium clearly allows side compounds above 200
°C. Moreover, below 200 °C the shorter the IT is, the lower
the yield is. Nevertheless, the optimum conditions for P3 include
a 2 min IT, and therefore its conversion to mainly VD3 can explain
why the VD3 yield at the 2 min IT is higher than the yield at the
longest residence time above 200 °C. In the light of these results,
it can be concluded that the photo-high-p,T microflow setup operates
close to the stability limits of 7DHC and VD3, and achieves the maximum
intensification possible.
Figure 7
Effect of the irradiation time on the (a) VD3
yield and (b) in
the reaction selectivity, operating at 34 bar and 0.05 M 7DHC concentration.
Effect of the irradiation time on the (a) VD3
yield and (b) in
the reaction selectivity, operating at 34 bar and 0.05 M 7DHC concentration.The selectivity of the reaction
has a decreasing tendency (Figure b). At low conversions
(low temperatures) high selectivity is found, while at medium and
especially high temperature the selectivity becomes very low because
of the side compounds and decomposition. The latter is especially
relevant above 200 °C. The low selectivity at 120 s of reaction
time is because of the P3 peak, as discussed above.
Statistical Analysis: Principal Component
Analysis (PCA)
In order to show the relevance of the reaction
variables studied for VD3 yield quantification, a Principal Component
Analysis (PCA) was performed using The Unscrambler software. With
this method, the experimental variables with the most variability
can be identified, and this information can be used for process optimization.
In this connection, the loadings plot (Figure ) shows the desired relation among studied
variables and the subspace dimensions. According to this plot, the
irradiation time (IT in the plot) accounts for 72% of the variability
of the VD3 yield, while the temperature only accounts for 28%. This
confirms that IT plays a more relevant role ahead of T, and therefore,
this is the key variable for the VD3 synthesis. Statistically, this
can be explained because the T profiles are rather similar. Additionally,
temperature shows up as a synergistic effect, but in a secondary component.
It is also important to note that concentration is in the center of
the axis. This confirms that concentration slightly contributes to
the variability of the VD3 yield in the reaction using the performed
setup, thus in capillary based photo-high-p,T.
Figure 8
Effect of the reaction
variables on the VD3 yield operating at
34 bar.
Effect of the reaction
variables on the VD3 yield operating at
34 bar.
Conclusions
Process intensification by both photochemistry and thermal intensification
may open additional options for photoreactions, yet is difficult to
be combined in one step using conventional procedures and equipment
because of safety risks. In this manuscript, this new kind of novel
process is presented and investigated. The photo-high-p,T microflow
setup used enables operation at high pressure and high temperature,
while allowing also for irradiation in a safe manner.The synthesis
of Vitamin D3 was proven under photo-high-p,T
conditions. The main result is a reduction of the reaction time to
43 s, which means orders of magnitude shorter times than in the case
of the same process carried out in batch. Also previous comparable
flow studies set the residence time at around 15 min. A 42% conversion
of 7DHC is achieved, giving a 17% yield of vitamin D3 and
25% of intermediates. This amounts to 40% selectivity. In addition,
working under harsh conditions showed a thermal limitation of performing
the reaction above 200 °C. Yet interestingly, working conditions
close to 200 °C were found to be optimal. As a promising result,
because of the small size of the capillary, no decrease in conversion
within the range of concentration was found. The highest concentration
used was close to the solubility limit the solvent used. This demands
the use of new, tailored solvents which are specialized for the needs
of flow processing (see www.one-flow.org). As given here, solvents would need to be identified which allow
work in the molar range, which then probably will show the concentration
dependence due to remarkable absorption losses. Nevertheless, the
annual productivity achieved with the current photo-high-p,T microflow
technique (just one microcapillary) suffices for several tens of millions
of tablets and is between 1 and 2 orders of magnitude higher than
comparable continuous processes described in the literature.Moreover, a statistical analysis was performed in order to evaluate
the influence of the variables (concentration, irradiation time, and
temperature) on the yield of vitamin D3. As a main and
unsurprising result, irradiation time is the key variable in this
reaction. As another truly new and insightful result, it was found
that the temperature also has a synergistic influence on the irradiation
step when both are combined at the same time. A common view is that
the reaction is performed in two steps: photochemical and thermal.
Nevertheless, these steps are performed in conventional equipment
separating the steps spatially and timewise. Yet, this paper gives
for the first time an approach of high T and irradiation at the same
time, suggesting that temperature plays a synergistic effect with
irradiation time in the reaction kinetics. As evident from the discussion
of the single plots and as quoted above, the study also confirms that
concentration does not have any role on the reaction performance.
Authors: Marc Escribà-Gelonch; Volker Hessel; Manuel C Maier; Timothy Noël; Maria Fernanda Neira d'Angelo; Heidrun Gruber-Woelfler Journal: Org Process Res Dev Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 3.317