Literature DB >> 29500506

[3D augmented reality visualization for navigated osteosynthesis of pelvic fractures].

N Befrui1, M Fischer2, B Fuerst3, S-C Lee3, J Fotouhi3, S Weidert2, A Johnson4, E Euler2, G Osgood4, N Navab3, W Böcker2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite great advances in the development of hardware and software components, surgical navigation systems have only seen limited use in current clinical settings due to their reported complexity, difficulty of integration into clinical workflows and questionable advantages over traditional imaging modalities.
OBJECTIVES: Development of augmented reality (AR) visualization for surgical navigation without the need for infrared (IR) tracking markers and comparison of the navigation system to conventional imaging.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Novel navigation system combining a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) capable C‑arm with a red-green-blue depth (RGBD) camera. Testing of the device by Kirschner wire (K-wire) placement in phantoms and evaluation of the necessary operating time, number of fluoroscopic images and overall radiation dose were compared to conventional x‑ray imaging.
RESULTS: We found a significant reduction of the required time, number of fluoroscopic images and overall radiation dose in 3D AR navigation in comparison to x‑ray imaging.
CONCLUSION: Our AR navigation using RGBD cameras offers a flexible and intuitive visualization of the operating field for the navigated osteosynthesis without IR tracking markers, enabling surgeons to complete operations quicker and with a lower radiation exposure to the patient and surgical staff.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer assisted surgery; Feasibility studies; Kirschner wires; Radiation exposure; Time factors

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29500506      PMCID: PMC5898194          DOI: 10.1007/s00113-018-0466-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  10 in total

Review 1.  Potential pitfalls of computer aided orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Frank Langlotz
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Screw placement for acetabular fractures: which navigation modality (2-dimensional vs. 3-dimensional) should be used? An experimental study.

Authors:  Florian Gras; Ivan Marintschev; Kajetan Klos; Thomas Mückley; Gunther O Hofmann; David M Kahler
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  The 'safe zone' for extra-articular screw placement during intra-pelvic acetabular surgery.

Authors:  Pierre Guy; Mohammad Al-Otaibi; Edward J Harvey; Nader Helmy
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 4.  Image guidance in pelvic and acetabular surgery--expectations, success and limitations.

Authors:  Ulrich Stöckle; Klaus Schaser; Benjamin König
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Navigating the fluoroscope's C-arm back into position: an accurate and practicable solution to cut radiation and optimize intraoperative workflow.

Authors:  Felix Matthews; Dominik J Hoigne; Manfred Weiser; Guido A Wanner; Pietro Regazzoni; Norbert Suhm; Peter Messmer
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Surgeons blinded by enhanced navigation: the effect of augmented reality on attention.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dixon; Michael J Daly; Harley Chan; Allan D Vescan; Ian J Witterick; Jonathan C Irish
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Iliosacral screw fixation: early complications of the percutaneous technique.

Authors:  M L Routt; P T Simonian; W J Mills
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Does computer-assisted spine surgery reduce intraoperative radiation doses?

Authors:  Florian T Gebhard; Michael D Kraus; Eugen Schneider; Ulrich C Liener; Lothar Kinzl; Markus Arand
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the surgery task load index (SURG-TLX).

Authors:  Mark R Wilson; Jamie M Poolton; Neha Malhotra; Karen Ngo; Elizabeth Bright; Rich S W Masters
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Computer-aided surgery does not increase the accuracy of dorsal pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a retrospective analysis of 2,003 pedicle screws in a level I trauma center.

Authors:  Michael Kraus; Julia Weiskopf; Jens Dreyhaupt; Gert Krischak; Florian Gebhard
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2014-12-12
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  [Digitalization and artificial intelligence in orthopedics and traumatology].

Authors:  K Harren; F Dittrich; F Reinecke; M Jäger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery - A systematic review.

Authors:  Lukas Jud; Javad Fotouhi; Octavian Andronic; Alexander Aichmair; Greg Osgood; Nassir Navab; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.