Literature DB >> 15183699

Potential pitfalls of computer aided orthopedic surgery.

Frank Langlotz1.   

Abstract

Computer aided orthopedic surgery (CAOS) systems are becoming more and more frequently used in operating rooms all over the world. While their clinical benefit is no longer doubted, there is considerable potential for using these devices incorrectly At best, mishandling of a CAOS system may lead to prolonged operating times. In the worst case scenario, incorrect navigational feedback is provided, which carries the potential risk of endangering the patient or resulting in an unacceptable surgical outcome. From an economical point of view only the optimal performance of a navigation system will probably justify its significant investment costs. This article summarizes some of the major pitfalls that may occur during surgical navigation. It is structured to reflect different types of CAOS systems, and it presents guidelines on how to avoid most of the problems. In general, a surgeon who wants to apply this technology needs to be very familiar with the system that is used. It is essential to know the basics and the limitations of the underlying technical principles. Otherwise, the large potential that modern CAOS systems make available cannot be exploited effectively for the benefit of the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15183699     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  5 in total

1.  Are Skin Fiducials Comparable to Bone Fiducials for Registration When Planning Navigation-assisted Musculoskeletal Tumor Resections in a Cadaveric Simulated Tumor Model?

Authors:  Rodolfo Zamora; Stephanie E Punt; Claudia Christman-Skieller; Cengiz Yildirim; John C Shapton; Ernest U Conrad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A laboratory comparison of computer navigation and individualized guides for distal radius osteotomy.

Authors:  Burton Ma; Manuela Kunz; Braden Gammon; Randy E Ellis; David R Pichora
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Assessment of registration accuracy during computer-aided oncologic limb-salvage surgery.

Authors:  Kurt E Stoll; Joan D Miles; Jedediah K White; Stephanie E W Punt; Ernest U Conrad; Randal P Ching
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 4.  [3D augmented reality visualization for navigated osteosynthesis of pelvic fractures].

Authors:  N Befrui; M Fischer; B Fuerst; S-C Lee; J Fotouhi; S Weidert; A Johnson; E Euler; G Osgood; N Navab; W Böcker
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Accuracy and Precision of a Surgical Navigation System: Effect of Camera and Patient Tracker Position and Number of Active Markers.

Authors:  Kenneth R Gundle; Jedediah K White; Ernest U Conrad; Randal P Ching
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-05-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.