Literature DB >> 29500264

Efficacy of a Sonicating Swab for Removal and Capture of Microorganisms from Experimental and Natural Contaminated Surfaces.

Gianna P Ahnrud1, Alma J Mendoza1, Matthew J Hurley2, Patrick J Marek3.   

Abstract

Enhancements in swabbing technology to increase sample collection efficacy would benefit the food industry. Specifically, these enhancements would assist the food industry in implementing the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) requirements by improving environmental monitoring effectiveness. A sonicating swab device, an example of an enhanced swabbing technology, was demonstrated previously to remove biofilm from stainless steel more efficiently than a standard cotton swab. Within this study, the performance of the sonicating swab was compared to that of the standard cotton swab for the recovery of Listeria monocytogenes from inoculated surfaces (plastic cutting board, wood cutting board, vinyl floor tile, and quarry clay floor tile). Additionally, we demonstrate the sonicating swab performance for collection of a microbiological sample from used commercial plastic cutting boards (noninoculated) in comparison to cotton swabs, foam swabs, and sponges. The sonicating swab captured significantly (P ≤ 0.05) more L. monocytogenes than the cotton swab for both the quarry tile and wood cutting board, while no significant differences were observed for the plastic cutting board or the vinyl floor tile. The sonicating swab consistently recovered significantly (P ≤ 0.05) more bacteria from the used cutting boards than did the standard cotton swab or the 3M Enviro swab, and it recovered significantly (P ≤ 0.05) more bacteria than the sponge swab for a majority of the time (4 of 6 trials). The results of this study indicate that swab technology can still be improved and that the sonicating swab is a viable technological enhancement which aids microbiological sample collection.IMPORTANCE Swabbing of surface areas for microbial contamination has been the standard for the detection and enumeration of microorganisms for many years. Inadequate surface sampling can result in foodborne illness outbreaks due to biotransfer of harmful microorganisms from food contact surfaces to foods. Swab material type, surface characteristics, and swabbing method used are a few of the factors associated with swabbing that can result in the variability of bacterial cell recovery for detection and enumeration. A previous study highlighted a sonicating swab prototype and its ability to recover cells from a stainless steel surface more efficiently and reliably than a standard swab method (T. A. Branck, M. J. Hurley, G. N. Prata, C. A. Crivello, and P. J. Marek, Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e00109-17, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00109-17). This study expands upon the capabilities of the sonicating swab technology to recover cells from multiple surface types with increased performance over traditional swabbing methods as a tool to further assist in the prevention of foodborne illness outbreaks. This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  capture; microorganisms; removal; sonicating; swab

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29500264      PMCID: PMC5930312          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00208-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  11 in total

1.  New technique to take samples from environmental surfaces using flocked nylon swabs.

Authors:  G Hedin; J Rynbäck; B Loré
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Evaluation of a macrofoam swab protocol for the recovery of Bacillus anthracis spores from a steel surface.

Authors:  L R Hodges; L J Rose; A Peterson; J Noble-Wang; M J Arduino
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Evaluation of quantitative recovery methods for Listeria monocytogenes applied to stainless steel.

Authors:  David Kang; Joseph D Eifert; Robert C Williams; Steven Pao
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.913

4.  Simplified Henry technique for initial recognition of Listeria colonies.

Authors:  R V Lachica
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Efficacy of a Sonicating Swab for Removal and Capture of Listeria monocytogenes in Biofilms on Stainless Steel.

Authors:  Tobyn A Branck; Matthew J Hurley; Gianna N Prata; Christina A Crivello; Patrick J Marek
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Microbiological sampling of surfaces.

Authors:  M S Favero; J J McDade; J A Robertsen; R K Hoffman; R W Edwards
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1968-09

7.  Effectiveness of cleaning techniques used in the food industry in terms of the removal of bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  H Gibson; J H Taylor; K E Hall; J T Holah
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Evaluation of sampling tools for environmental sampling of bacterial endospores from porous and nonporous surfaces.

Authors:  N B Valentine; M G Butcher; Y-F Su; K H Jarman; M Matzke; B-J Webb-Robertson; E A Panisko; B A B Seiders; K L Wahl
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Evaluation of three swabbing devices for detection of Listeria monocytogenes on different types of food contact surfaces.

Authors:  Evy Lahou; Mieke Uyttendaele
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Methods for recovering microorganisms from solid surfaces used in the food industry: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rached Ismaïl; Florence Aviat; Valérie Michel; Isabelle Le Bayon; Perrine Gay-Perret; Magdalena Kutnik; Michel Fédérighi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sewer biofilm microbiome and antibiotic resistance genes as function of pipe material, source of microbes, and disinfection: field and laboratory studies.

Authors:  William R Morales Medina; Alessia Eramo; Melissa Tu; N L Fahrenfeld
Journal:  Environ Sci (Camb)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.251

Review 2.  Testing the Antimicrobial Characteristics of Wood Materials: A Review of Methods.

Authors:  Muhammad Tanveer Munir; Hélène Pailhories; Matthieu Eveillard; Mark Irle; Florence Aviat; Laurence Dubreil; Michel Federighi; Christophe Belloncle
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.