Literature DB >> 28314729

Efficacy of a Sonicating Swab for Removal and Capture of Listeria monocytogenes in Biofilms on Stainless Steel.

Tobyn A Branck1, Matthew J Hurley2, Gianna N Prata3, Christina A Crivello3, Patrick J Marek4.   

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes is of great concern in food processing facilities because it persists in biofilms, facilitating biotransfer. Stainless steel is commonly used for food contact surfaces and transport containers. L. monocytogenes biofilms on stainless steel served as a model system for surface sampling, to test the performance of a sonicating swab in comparison with a standard cotton swab. Swab performance and consistency were determined using total viable counts. Stainless steel coupons sampled with both types of swabs were examined using scanning electron microscopy, to visualize biofilms and surface structures (i.e., polishing grooves and scratches). Laser scanning confocal microscopy was used to image and to quantitate the biofilms remaining after sampling with each swab type. The total viable counts were significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) with the sonicating swab than with the standard swab in each trial. The sonicating swab was more consistent in cell recovery than was the standard swab, with coefficients of variation ranging from 8.9% to 12.3% and from 7.1% to 37.6%, respectively. Scanning electron microscopic imaging showed that biofilms remained in the polished grooves of the coupons sampled with the standard swab but were noticeably absent with the sonicating swab. Percent area measurements of biofilms remaining on the stainless steel coupons showed significantly (P ≤ 0.05) less biofilm remaining when the sonicating swab was used (median, 1.1%), compared with the standard swab (median, 70.4%). The sonicating swab provided greater recovery of cells, with more consistency, than did the standard swab, and it is employs sonication, suction, and scrubbing.IMPORTANCE Inadequate surface sampling can result in foodborne illness outbreaks from biotransfer, since verification of sanitization protocols relies on surface sampling and recovery of microorganisms for detection and enumeration. Swabbing is a standard method for microbiological sampling of surfaces. Although swabbing offers portability and ease of use, there are limitations, such as high user variability and low recovery rates, which can be attributed to many different causes. This study demonstrates some benefits that a sonicating swab has over a standard swab for removal and collection of microbiological samples from a surface, to provide better verification of surface cleanliness and to help decrease the potential for biotransfer of pathogens into foods.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biofilm; capture; removal; sonicating; swab

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28314729      PMCID: PMC5440701          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00109-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  26 in total

1.  Effects of physicochemical surface characteristics of Listeria monocytogenes strains on attachment to glass.

Authors:  Min Seok Chae; Heidi Schraft; Lisbeth Truelstrup Hansen; Robert Mackereth
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 5.516

2.  Sonic and mechanical toothbrushes. An in vitro study showing altered microbial surface structures but lack of effect on viability.

Authors:  S MacNeill; D M Walters; A Dey; A G Glaros; C M Cobb
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 8.728

3.  Simplified Henry technique for initial recognition of Listeria colonies.

Authors:  R V Lachica
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Microtiter plate assay for assessment of Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation.

Authors:  D Djordjevic; M Wiedmann; L A McLandsborough
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Validation of a nylon-flocked-swab protocol for efficient recovery of bacterial spores from smooth and rough surfaces.

Authors:  Alexander Probst; Rainer Facius; Reinhard Wirth; Christine Moissl-Eichinger
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Comparative evaluation of methods for counting surviving biofilm cells adhering to a polyvinyl chloride surface exposed to chlorine or drying.

Authors:  A Asséré; N Oulahal; B Carpentier
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  Comparison of 3M Petrifilm environmental Listeria plates against standard enrichment methods for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes of epidemiological significance from environmental surfaces.

Authors:  D G Nyachuba; C W Donnelly
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Evaluation of sampling tools for environmental sampling of bacterial endospores from porous and nonporous surfaces.

Authors:  N B Valentine; M G Butcher; Y-F Su; K H Jarman; M Matzke; B-J Webb-Robertson; E A Panisko; B A B Seiders; K L Wahl
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes on stainless steel surface and biotransfer potential.

Authors:  Maíra Maciel Mattos de Oliveira; Danilo Florisvaldo Brugnera; Eduardo Alves; Roberta Hilsdorf Piccoli
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.476

Review 10.  Methods for recovering microorganisms from solid surfaces used in the food industry: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rached Ismaïl; Florence Aviat; Valérie Michel; Isabelle Le Bayon; Perrine Gay-Perret; Magdalena Kutnik; Michel Fédérighi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Novel Method for Sampling and Long-Term Monitoring of Microbes That Uses Stickers of Plain Paper.

Authors:  Martin Bobal; Anna Kristina Witte; Patrick Mester; Susanne Fister; Dagmar Schoder; Peter Rossmanith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Sewer biofilm microbiome and antibiotic resistance genes as function of pipe material, source of microbes, and disinfection: field and laboratory studies.

Authors:  William R Morales Medina; Alessia Eramo; Melissa Tu; N L Fahrenfeld
Journal:  Environ Sci (Camb)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.251

3.  Efficacy of a Sonicating Swab for Removal and Capture of Microorganisms from Experimental and Natural Contaminated Surfaces.

Authors:  Gianna P Ahnrud; Alma J Mendoza; Matthew J Hurley; Patrick J Marek
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Comparative Study of Different Sampling Methods of Biofilm Formed on Stainless-Steel Surfaces in a CDC Biofilm Reactor.

Authors:  Nissa Niboucha; Coralie Goetz; Laurie Sanschagrin; Juliette Fontenille; Ismaïl Fliss; Steve Labrie; Julie Jean
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.064

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.