Literature DB >> 29500043

Long-lasting effects of transcranial static magnetic field stimulation on motor cortex excitability.

Michele Dileone1, Laura Mordillo-Mateos2, Antonio Oliviero3, Guglielmo Foffani4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) was recently added to the family of inhibitory non-invasive brain stimulation techniques. However, the application of tSMS for 10-20 min over the motor cortex (M1) induces only short-lasting effects that revert within few minutes.
OBJECTIVE: We examined whether increasing the duration of tSMS to 30 min leads to long-lasting changes in cortical excitability, which is critical for translating tSMS toward clinical applications.
METHODS: The study comprised 5 experiments in 45 healthy subjects. We assessed the impact of 30-min-tSMS over M1 on corticospinal excitability, as measured by the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and resting motor thresholds (RMTs) to single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) (experiments 1-2). We then assessed the impact of 30-min-tSMS on intracortical excitability, as measured by short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) using paired-pulse TMS protocols (experiments 2-4). We finally assessed the impact of 10-min-tSMS on SICF and SICI (experiment 5).
RESULTS: 30-min-tSMS decreased MEP amplitude compared to sham for at least 30 min after the end of the stimulation. This long-lasting effect was associated with increased SICF and reduced SICI. 10-min-tSMS -previously reported to induce a short-lasting decrease in MEP amplitude- produced the opposite changes in intracortical excitability, decreasing SICF while increasing SICI.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a dissociation of intracortical changes in the consolidation from short-lasting to long-lasting decrease of corticospinal excitability induced by tSMS. The long-lasting effects of 30-min-tSMS open the way to the translation of this simple, portable and low-cost technique toward clinical trials.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LTD; MEP; SICF; SICI; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; tSMS

Year:  2018        PMID: 29500043     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  13 in total

1.  Effects of Transcranial Static Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Cortex Evaluated by Different TMS Waveforms and Current Directions.

Authors:  Paula Davila-Pérez; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Javier Cudeiro
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Static magnetic stimulation of human auditory cortex: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Gurutzi Azcona Ganuza; Manuel Alegre
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 1.703

Review 3.  Static magnetic stimulation in the central nervous system: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nuria Viudes-Sarrion; Enrique Velasco; Miguel Delicado-Miralles; Carmen Lillo-Navarro
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 3.830

4.  Static magnetic field stimulation over motor cortex modulates resting functional connectivity in humans.

Authors:  Vanesa Soto-León; Mabel Torres-Llacsa; Laura Mordillo-Mateos; Carmen Carrasco-López; José A Pineda-Pardo; Ana I Velasco; Laura Abad-Toribio; Jesús Tornero; Guglielmo Foffani; Bryan A Strange; Antonio Oliviero
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Static magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex impairs online but not offline motor sequence learning.

Authors:  Angélina Lacroix; Léa Proulx-Bégin; Raphaël Hamel; Louis De Beaumont; Pierre-Michel Bernier; Jean-François Lepage
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Ten minutes of transcranial static magnetic field stimulation does not reliably modulate motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  Sabrina Lorenz; Birte Alex; Thomas Kammer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation of the Motor Cortex in Children.

Authors:  Asha Hollis; Ephrem Zewdie; Alberto Nettel-Aguirre; Alicia Hilderley; Hsing-Ching Kuo; Helen L Carlson; Adam Kirton
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Static magnetic field stimulation of the supplementary motor area modulates resting-state activity and motor behavior.

Authors:  José A Pineda-Pardo; Ignacio Obeso; Pasqualina Guida; Michele Dileone; Bryan A Strange; José A Obeso; Antonio Oliviero; Guglielmo Foffani
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2019-10-31

9.  A framework to assess the impact of number of trials on the amplitude of motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Claudia Ammann; Pasqualina Guida; Jaime Caballero-Insaurriaga; José A Pineda-Pardo; Antonio Oliviero; Guglielmo Foffani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Andrea Antal; Sven Bestmann; Marom Bikson; Carmen Brewer; Jürgen Brockmöller; Linda L Carpenter; Massimo Cincotta; Robert Chen; Jeff D Daskalakis; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Michael D Fox; Mark S George; Donald Gilbert; Vasilios K Kimiskidis; Giacomo Koch; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Jean Pascal Lefaucheur; Letizia Leocani; Sarah H Lisanby; Carlo Miniussi; Frank Padberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Walter Paulus; Angel V Peterchev; Angelo Quartarone; Alexander Rotenberg; John Rothwell; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Mouhsin M Shafi; Hartwig R Siebner; Yoshikatzu Ugawa; Eric M Wassermann; Abraham Zangen; Ulf Ziemann; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.861

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.