| Literature DB >> 29499760 |
Lili Niu1, Xiliang Zhu2, Min Pan3, Abbott Derek4, Lisheng Xu5,6, Long Meng7, Hairong Zheng1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many studies have demonstrated that the geometry of the carotid bifurcation enables prediction of blood flow variation associated with atherosclerotic plaque formation. The phase angle between the arterial wall circumferential strain and its instantaneous wall shear stress is known as stress phase angle (SPA). This parameter is used to evaluate hemodynamic factors of atherogenesis. Note that SPA can be numerically computed for the purpose of locating atherosclerosis in different artery geometries. However, there is no experimental data to verify its role in the location of atherosclerosis in different artery geometries. In this study, we use an ultrasonic biomechanical method to experimentally evaluate the role of SPA for locating atherosclerosis in carotid bifurcation.Entities:
Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Carotid bifurcation; Hemodynamics; Ultrasound imaging; Wall shear stress
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29499760 PMCID: PMC5833153 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-018-0458-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Eng Online ISSN: 1475-925X Impact factor: 2.819
Fig. 1Experimental set-up was established to calculate the circumferential strain and wall shear stress of carotid anthropomorphic vascular phantoms and the polyvinyl alcohol (PVA-c) phantoms using the ultrasonic biomechanics method
Fig. 2a A carotid anthropomorphic vascular phantom representing a normal carotid bifurcation; b the enlarged image of carotid bifurcation; c the ultrasound contrast image of external carotid artery
Fig. 3The carotid bifurcation mold consisting of a a polished stainless-steel shell, and b a bifurcated inner rod (6 mm CCA diameter, 4.5 mm ICA diameter, 4 mm ECA diameter). c All the components were assembled together, and the PVA solution was injected into the gap. d The resulting carotid bifurcation vessel phantom. e The ultrasound contrast image of external carotid artery
Fig. 4The distribution of arterial diameter and wall shear rate for carotid anthropomorphic vascular phantoms in the common carotid arteries (a), external carotid arteries (b), and internal carotid arteries (c)
Fig. 5The distribution of arterial diameter and wall shear rate for PVA-c phantom in the common carotid arteries (a), external carotid arteries (b), and internal carotid arteries (c)
Parameters of the stress phase angle (SPA), wall shear rate (WSR) and arterial strain in different locations of PVA-c phantoms
| Location | SPA (o) | WSR (1/s) | Strain (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCAs | − 173.47 ± 0.065 | 21.94 ± 0.125 | 4.31 ± 0.33 |
| ECAs | − 115.57 ± 4.83 | 26.13 ± 0.51 | 2.35 ± 0.055 |
| ICAs | − 233.9 ± 8.12 | 16.06 ± 0.92 | 3.18 ± 0.05 |
CCAs common carotid arteries; ECAs external carotid arteries; ICAs internal carotid arteries
Fig. 6The distribution of arterial diameter and wall shear rate in mice common carotid arteries (a), external carotid arteries (b), and internal carotid arteries (c)
Values of stress phase angle, wall shear rate and arterial strain in specific locations of carotid arteries in mice
| Location | SPA (o) | WSR (1/s) | Strain (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCAs | − 141.97 ± 8.03 | 28.45 ± 3.82 | 19.07 ± 2.15 |
| ECAs | − 170.07 ± 9.24 | 21.68 ± 2.99 | 13.62 ± 2.40 |
| ICAs | − 280.08 ± 13.12 | 19.82 ± 3.23 | 11.68 ± 1.15 |
| F | 148.84 | 5.45 | 11.32 |
| p | 0.0001 | 0.045 | 0.009 |
The abbreviations are as in Table 1