| Literature DB >> 29497027 |
Zhengyi Guo1, Chunli Liu1, Haifeng Hou2, Ruiying Li1, Jichun Su1, Fuyong Zhang1, Guoqiang Xing1, Linlin Qian1, Jianfeng Qiu2, Yuanzhong Xie1, Ningxi Zhu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to retrospectively analyze patient clinical data to investigate the effects of computed tomography (CT) reconstruction and the measurement of abnormal structures in the endonasal sphenoidal sinus approach on the operative effects in patients undergoing pituitary adenoma resection. MATERIAL AND METHODS The records of 53 patients who underwent pituitary adenoma resection via the endonasal transsphenoidal approach in the Neurosurgery Department of Tai'an City Central Hospital from December 2010 to June 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. All cases showed anatomical abnormalities in the endonasal transsphenoidal approach that were detected by conventional CT scans. The clinical data of the patients were reviewed. After review, 26 patients who underwent preoperative CT reconstruction and measurement of abnormal structures before surgery were included in the observation group (CT reconstruction group), and 27 patients who did not undergo CT reconstruction and measurement of abnormal structures were included in the control group. Data on intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications were collected to assess the quality of the surgery. RESULTS Compared with the control group, the observation group showed less blood loss (p<0.001), a shorter operation time (p<0.001), fewer postoperative complications (p<0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative CT reconstruction and measurement of abnormal structures in patients undergoing pituitary adenoma resection by the endonasal transsphenoidal approach can improve operative quality and reduce complications.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29497027 PMCID: PMC5844192 DOI: 10.12659/msm.904402
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Baseline characteristics of subjects.
| Items | Observation group (n=26) | Control group (n=27) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | Age | 45.6±7.4 | 47.2±9.7 | 0.504 |
| Men | 12 | 14 | 0.678 | |
| Tumor pathological type | Prolactin cell adenoma | 12 | 11 | 0.691 |
| Growth hormone adenoma | 3 | 4 | 1.000 | |
| ACTH cell adenoma | 2 | 3 | 1.000 | |
| TSH adenoma | 1 | 2 | 1.000 | |
| non-secretory adenoma | 8 | 7 | 0.484 | |
| Tumor size (cm) | <1 | 2 | 3 | 0.747 |
| 1–4 | 16 | 18 | ||
| ≥4 | 8 | 6 | ||
| Tumor resection rate | Total resection | 20 | 21 | 0.941 |
| Subtotal resection | 6 | 6 |
Was calculated using continuity correction.
ACTH – Adrenocorticotropic hormone; TSH – thyroid stimulating hormone
Figure 1Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) of head computed tomography angiogram images of the internal carotid artery bone defects in the lumen of the sphenoidal sinus in a patient. (A) Axial image of the internal carotid artery in the lateral wall of the sphenoid sinus. The arrows indicate a bone defect on the left; there is no bone defect on the right. (B) Axial image of the internal carotid artery at the front and rear along the lateral wall of the sphenoid sinus. The arrows indicate a bone defect on the left; there is no bone defect on the right. (C) MPR sagittal image of the internal carotid artery exposed to the lumen of the sphenoidal sinus due to bone defects, as indicated by the arrows. (D) MPR coronal images of the left and right internal carotid arteries. The arrows indicate a bone defect in the left lumen of the sphenoidal sinus.
Figure 2Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) images of anatomical abnormalities in the endonasal transsphenoidal approach in typical patients. The arrows indicate (A) nasal septum curve to the left, (B) bilateral middle turbinate gasification, (C) bilateral middle turbinate curve reverse, and (D) bilateral ethmoid sinus above the sphenoid sinus. (E) Sphenoidal sinus gasification of the conchal type. (F) Sphenoidal sinus gasification of the saddle pillow type.
Abnormal anatomical distribution in the observation group and the control group [number (%)].
| Groups | Cases | Nasal septum curve | Middle turbinate gasification | Middle turbinate curve reverse | Ethmoid sinus above the sphenoid sinus | Fissured sphenoid sinus | Sphenoidal sinus gasification of conchiform type | Multi-atrial septum of sphenoidal sinus | Internal carotid artery bone defects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 26 | 6 (23.1) | 5 (19.2) | 2 (7.7) | 1 (3.8) | 1 (3.8) | 1 (3.8) | 1 (3.8) | 1 (3.7) |
| Control group | 27 | 5 (18.5) | 4 (14.8) | 1 (3.7) | 2 (7.4) | 2 (7.4) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| χ2 value | – | 0.167 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – |
| – | 0.682 | 0.950 | 0.973 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.509 | 0.509 | 0.509 |
Was calculated using continuity correction;
was calculated using the Fisher exact probability
Figure 3CT reconstruction and measurement of abnormal anatomy. (A) Three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction images of the multi-atrial sphenoidal sinus septum. (B) Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) sagittal measurement. OL is the skull base plane line. OP is the connection from the columella root to the sellar floor midpoint. OM is the connection from the columella root to the sphenoidal sinus inferior pole.
Figure 4The MPR agittal measurement of the lumen of the nasal sphenoidal region. OL is the skull base plane line. OP is the connection from the columella root to the sellar floor midpoint.OM is the connection from the columella root to the sphenoidal sinus inferior pole.
Comparisons of the postoperative complications between the observation group and the control group [case number (%)].
| Groups | Cases | Cerebrospinal fluid leakage | Blood loss | Septum perforation | Diabetes insipidus | Infection | Sum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 26 | 1 (3.8) | 0 | 0 | 1 (3.8) | 0 | 2 (7.6) |
| Control group | 27 | 4 (14.8) | 2 (7.4) | 2 (7.4) | 2 (7.4) | 1 (3.7) | 11 (40.7) |
Comparisons of the perioperative indexes between the observation group and the control group (χ̄±s).
| Groups | Intraoperative blood loss (ml) | Operation time (min) | Postoperative hospital stay (d) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 50.0±8.4 | 97.6±9.0 | 5.0±1.6 |
| Control group | 80.4±7.3 | 155.0±15.7 | 7.4±1.1 |
| 14.078 | 16.245 | 6.384 | |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |