Roseann E Peterson1, Na Cai1, Andy W Dahl1, Tim B Bigdeli1, Alexis C Edwards1, Bradley T Webb1, Silviu-Alin Bacanu1, Noah Zaitlen1, Jonathan Flint1, Kenneth S Kendler1. 1. From the Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics and the Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.; the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, U.K.; the European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, U.K.; the Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco; the State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, N.Y.; and the Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The extent to which major depression is the outcome of a single biological mechanism or represents a final common pathway of multiple disease processes remains uncertain. Genetic approaches can potentially identify etiologic heterogeneity in major depression by classifying patients on the basis of their experience of major adverse events. METHOD: Data are from the China, Oxford, and VCU Experimental Research on Genetic Epidemiology (CONVERGE) project, a study of Han Chinese women with recurrent major depression aimed at identifying genetic risk factors for major depression in a rigorously ascertained cohort carefully assessed for key environmental risk factors (N=9,599). To detect etiologic heterogeneity, genome-wide association studies, heritability analyses, and gene-by-environment interaction analyses were performed. RESULTS: Genome-wide association studies stratified by exposure to adversity revealed three novel loci associated with major depression only in study participants with no history of adversity. Significant gene-by-environment interactions were seen between adversity and genotype at all three loci, and 13.2% of major depression liability can be attributed to genome-wide interaction with adversity exposure. The genetic risk in major depression for participants who reported major adverse life events (27%) was partially shared with that in participants who did not (73%; genetic correlation=+0.64). Together with results from simulation studies, these findings suggest etiologic heterogeneity within major depression as a function of environmental exposures. CONCLUSIONS: The genetic contributions to major depression may differ between women with and those without major adverse life events. These results have implications for the molecular dissection of major depression and other complex psychiatric and biomedical diseases.
OBJECTIVE: The extent to which major depression is the outcome of a single biological mechanism or represents a final common pathway of multiple disease processes remains uncertain. Genetic approaches can potentially identify etiologic heterogeneity in major depression by classifying patients on the basis of their experience of major adverse events. METHOD: Data are from the China, Oxford, and VCU Experimental Research on Genetic Epidemiology (CONVERGE) project, a study of Han Chinese women with recurrent major depression aimed at identifying genetic risk factors for major depression in a rigorously ascertained cohort carefully assessed for key environmental risk factors (N=9,599). To detect etiologic heterogeneity, genome-wide association studies, heritability analyses, and gene-by-environment interaction analyses were performed. RESULTS: Genome-wide association studies stratified by exposure to adversity revealed three novel loci associated with major depression only in study participants with no history of adversity. Significant gene-by-environment interactions were seen between adversity and genotype at all three loci, and 13.2% of major depression liability can be attributed to genome-wide interaction with adversity exposure. The genetic risk in major depression for participants who reported major adverse life events (27%) was partially shared with that in participants who did not (73%; genetic correlation=+0.64). Together with results from simulation studies, these findings suggest etiologic heterogeneity within major depression as a function of environmental exposures. CONCLUSIONS: The genetic contributions to major depression may differ between women with and those without major adverse life events. These results have implications for the molecular dissection of major depression and other complex psychiatric and biomedical diseases.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diagnosis and Classification; Genetics; Mood Disorders-Unipolar
Authors: Brendan K Bulik-Sullivan; Po-Ru Loh; Hilary K Finucane; Stephan Ripke; Jian Yang; Nick Patterson; Mark J Daly; Alkes L Price; Benjamin M Neale Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2015-02-02 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: K S Kendler; R C Kessler; E E Walters; C MacLean; M C Neale; A C Heath; L J Eaves Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Na Cai; Tim B Bigdeli; Warren W Kretzschmar; Yihan Li; Jieqin Liang; Jingchu Hu; Roseann E Peterson; Silviu Bacanu; Bradley Todd Webb; Brien Riley; Qibin Li; Jonathan Marchini; Richard Mott; Kenneth S Kendler; Jonathan Flint Journal: Sci Data Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 6.444
Authors: Anna R Docherty; Arden Moscati; Tim B Bigdeli; Alexis C Edwards; Roseann E Peterson; Daniel E Adkins; John S Anderson; Jonathan Flint; Kenneth S Kendler; Silviu-Alin Bacanu Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Alicia R Martin; Mark J Daly; Elise B Robinson; Steven E Hyman; Benjamin M Neale Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2018-12-28 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Richard C Crist; Rachel Vickers-Smith; Rachel L Kember; Christopher T Rentsch; Heng Xu; E Jennifer Edelman; Emily E Hartwell; Kyle M Kampman; Henry R Kranzler Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-08-28 Impact factor: 4.852
Authors: Na Cai; Joana A Revez; Mark J Adams; Till F M Andlauer; Gerome Breen; Enda M Byrne; Toni-Kim Clarke; Andreas J Forstner; Hans J Grabe; Steven P Hamilton; Douglas F Levinson; Cathryn M Lewis; Glyn Lewis; Nicholas G Martin; Yuri Milaneschi; Ole Mors; Bertram Müller-Myhsok; Brenda W J H Penninx; Roy H Perlis; Giorgio Pistis; James B Potash; Martin Preisig; Jianxin Shi; Jordan W Smoller; Fabien Streit; Henning Tiemeier; Rudolf Uher; Sandra Van der Auwera; Alexander Viktorin; Myrna M Weissman; Kenneth S Kendler; Jonathan Flint Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Monika A Waszczuk; Anna R Docherty; Andrey A Shabalin; Jiaju Miao; Xiaohua Yang; Pei-Fen Kuan; Evelyn Bromet; Roman Kotov; Benjamin J Luft Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 7.723