| Literature DB >> 29495522 |
Diane R Bienek1, Stanislav A Frukhtbeyn2, Anthony A Giuseppetti3, Ugochukwu C Okeke4, Drago Skrtic5.
Abstract
A trend for the next generation of polymeric dental restoratives is to incorporate multifunctional capabilities to regulate microbial growth and remineralize tooth surfaces.Entities:
Keywords: amorphous calcium phosphate; antimicrobial and remineralizing composites; antimicrobial methacrylate monomers; dental materials
Year: 2018 PMID: 29495522 PMCID: PMC5872106 DOI: 10.3390/jfb9010020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Funct Biomater ISSN: 2079-4983
Antimicrobial efficacy expressed as n-fold decrease in biofilm formation of experimental QADM-based dental materials.
| Ref. | Dental Material | Experimental Groups | Fold Decrease 1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Control: Commercial composite | ||
| 20% nACP + 6% QADM (aged 1 day) | 1.36 | ||
| 20% nACP + 0.1% nAg (aged 1 day) | 1.75 | ||
| 20% nACP + 6% QADM + 0.1% nAg (aged 1 day) | 2.69 | ||
| [ | Control: Composite (no fluoride) | ||
| 19.5% nACP | 1.25 | ||
| 19.5% nACP + 7% QADM | 1.73 | ||
| 19.5% nACP + 0.028% nAg | 1.98 | ||
| 19.5% nACP + 7% QADM + 0.028% nAg | 3.00 | ||
| [ | Primer control + Adhesive control | ||
| Primer w/10% QADM + Adhesive w/10% QADM | 1.65 | ||
| Primer w/0.05% nAg + Adhesive w/0.05% nAg | 2.38 | ||
| [ | Primer control + Adhesive control | ||
| Primer w/0.1% nAg + Adhesive control | 2.70 | ||
| Primer w/0.1% nAg + Adhesive w/0.1% nAg, 10% QADM | 2.86 | ||
| Primer w/0.1% nAg + Adhesive w/0.1% nAg, 10% QADM, 10% nACP | 3.07 | ||
| Primer w/0.1% nAg + Adhesive w/0.1% nAg, 10% QADM, 20% nACP | 2.98 | ||
| Primer w/0.1% nAg + Adhesive w/0.1% nAg, 10% QADM, 30% nACP | 4.57 | ||
| Primer w/0.1% nAg + Adhesive w/0.1% nAg, 10% QADM, 40% nACP | 5.11 |
1 indicates n-fold decrease in metabolic activity (mean absorbance of control/mean absorbance of experimental group) of bacterial biofilms. Mean absorbance data extracted from published figures.
Figure 1Typical 1H NMR spectrum of (a) IDMA1 and (b) of IDMA2.
Figure 2Typical 13C NMR spectrum of (a) IDMA1 and (b) of IDMA2.
Assignments of 13C and 1H NMR chemical shifts of IDMA1.
| Atom # | 13C Chemical Shift, ppm | 1H Chemical Shift, ppm | # H`s | Signal Splitting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.2 | 1.95 | 6 | singlet |
| 2 | 135.0 | 0 | ||
| 3 | 127.4 | 5.67, 6.15 | 2, 2 | singlets |
| 4 | 166.2 | 0 | ||
| 5 | 58.2 | 4.71 | 4 | multiplet |
| 6 | 63.6 | 4.31 | 4 | multiplet |
| 7, 8 | 52.5 | 3.63 | 6 | singlet |
Assignments of 13C and 1H NMR chemical shifts of IDMA2.
| Atom # | 13C Chemical Shift, ppm | 1H Chemical Shift, ppm | # H`s | Signal Splitting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.9 | 1.87 | 6 | singlet |
| 2 | 135.3 | 0 | ||
| 3 | 126.7 | 5.75, 6.03 | 2, 2 | singlets |
| 4 | 165.6 | 0 | ||
| 5 | 64.7 | 4.04, 4.63 | 2, 2 | doublets |
| 6 | 62.2 | 3.30, 3.59 | 2, 2 | multiplets |
| 7, 8 | 49.9, 50.0 | 2.66, 2.93 | 6, 6 | singlets |
| 9 | 57.6 | 4.22 | 4 | broad |
| 10 | 141.8 | 0 | ||
| 11 | 125.1 | 0 | ||
| 12 | 135.1 | 7.82 | 2 | multiplet |
| 13 | 131.0 | 7.69 | 2 | triplet |
| 14 | 128.4 | 7.63 | 2 | triplet |
| 15 | 132.8 | 7.52 | 2 | multiplet |
Figure 3Typical FTIR spectrum of (a) IDMA1 and (b) of IDMA2.
Figure 4Percent control value of metabolic activity of HGF cells exposed for 24 h or 72 h to two-fold serial dilutions of (a) IDMA1 (≤10.66 mmol/L) or (b) IDMA2 (≤5.7 mmol/L). Data represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) for five or more independent replicates tested in triplicate.
Figure 5Percent control value of viability of HGF cells exposed to two-fold serial dilutions of IDMA1 (≤10.66 mmol/L) for (a) 24 h or (b) 72 h to two-fold serial dilutions of IDMA1. Percent control value of viability of HGF cells exposed for (c) 24 h or (d) 72 h to two-fold serial dilutions of IDMA2 (≤5.70 mmol/L). Data represent mean ± SEM for five independent replicates tested in triplicate.
Figure 6Validation of synthesized ACP. (a) Morphology of ACP particles under scanning electron microscopy (×3500 magnification); (b) Differential particle size distribution (mean values ± SD, n = 2); (c) XRD pattern; (d) FTIR spectrum of milled ACP utilized to fabricate ACP/UPE-IDMA composites.
Figure 7Kinetics of ion release from ACP UPE composites upon prolonged aqueous immersion. Indicated are mean values ± SD of triplicate measurements.
Figure 8Changes in the overall hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the resins upon introduction of IDMAs (at 10 and 20 mass %) into UPE formulation. Indicated values represent mean ± SD for four replicate measurements.
Figure 9DVC attained in copolymers (near infra-red measurements; 24 h post cure) and the corresponding ACP composites; 15 min post-cure (curing conditions: 40 s, 500 mW/cm2). Shown are mean values ± SD for three replicate measurements.
Figure 10Polymerization stress (mean values ± SD for three replicate measurements) developed in ACP composite specimens 15 min after photo irradiation.
Figure 11BFS of copolymers and composites. Indicated are mean values ± SD for n = 5 (copolymer group) and n = 4 (composite group).