| Literature DB >> 24518683 |
Jing Fu1, Wenjia Liu2, Zhichao Hao3, Xiangnan Wu4, Jian Yin5, Anil Panjiyar6, Xiaoqing Liu7, Jiefei Shen8, Hang Wang9.
Abstract
In this study, a novel dental composite based on the unsaturated bismethylene spiroorthocarbonate expanding monomer 3,9-dimethylene-1,3,5,7-tetraoxa-spiro[5,5]undecane (BMSOC) and bisphenol-S-bis(3-meth acrylate-2-hydroxypropyl)ether (BisS-GMA) was prepared. CQ (camphorquinone) of 1 wt % and DMAEMA (2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) of 2 wt % were used in a photoinitiation system to initiate the copolymerization of the matrix resins. Distilled water contact angle measurements were performed for the wettability measurement. Degree of conversion, volumetric shrinkage, contraction stress and compressive strength were measured using Fourier Transformation Infrared-FTIR spectroscopy, the AccuVol and a universal testing machine, respectively. Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the resin composites modified by bismethylene spiroorthocarbonate and BisS-GMA showed a low volumetric shrinkage at 1.25% and a higher contact angle. The lower contraction stress, higher degree of conversion and compressive strength of the novel dental composites were also observed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24518683 PMCID: PMC3958858 DOI: 10.3390/ijms15022400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1.FTIR spectra exhibiting the reduction of aromatic C=C in peak height at 1635 cm−1 and tetraoxaspiro C–O absorbance at 1212 cm−1 associated with saturation of aliphatic C=C at 1590 cm−1 within the (BMSOC + BS)/T resin composite before and after cured.
Figure 2.The degree of conversion of the four groups of resin composites.
The contact angles of the composites (mean ± sd).
| Composites | Contact angle (°) |
|---|---|
| B/T | 45.3 (3.2) a |
| BS/T | 51.6 (2.0) b |
| (SOC + B)/T | 52.7 (2.5) b |
| (SOC + BS)/T | 58.9 (3.0) c |
The different letters (a–c) indicate statistically significant differences between the composites (p < 0.05); The same letter denotes values that are not significantly different. (p > 0.05).
Figure 3.Volumetric shrinkage (a); contraction stress (b) and compressive strength (c) of the four groups of resin composites.
Scheme 1.The main synthetic steps of BMSOC.
Figure 4.FTIR, 1H NMR and MS of BMSOC. (A) FTIR spectra of BMSOC; (B) 1H NMR spectra of BMSOC; (C) MS of BMSOC.
Figure 5.The chemical structure of materials used in the four groups of composites.
Materials used in this study.
| Resin composites (ratio) | Composition (abbreviation) | Photoinitiator system content(weight) |
|---|---|---|
| B/T (3:7) | Bis-GMA (B); TEGDMA (T) | CQ (1%)/DMAEMA (2%) |
| BS/T (3:7) | BisS-GMA (BS); TEGDMA (T) | CQ (1%)/DMAEMA (2%) |
| BMSOC (SOC); Bis-GMA (B); TEGDMA (T) | CQ (1%)/DMAEMA (2%) | |
| BMSOC (SOC); BisS-GMA (BS); TEGDMA (T) | CQ (1%)/DMAEMA (2%) |
The proportion of SOC and B/BS is 30% to 70%. BMSOC: 3,9-dimethylene-1,3,5,7-tetraoxa-spiro[5,5]undecane; Bis-GMA: 2,2-bis[4(2-hydroxy-3-methacryloylpropyloxy)phenyl]propane; BisS-GMA: bisphenol-S-bis (3-methacrylato-2-hydroxy propyl) ether; TEGDMA: striethylene glycol dimethacrylate; CQ: camphorquinone; DMAEMA: 2-(dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate.