Literature DB >> 32447414

Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate after focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Soleen Ghafoor1,2, Daniel Stocker3,4, Olivio F Donati3, Hebert Alberto Vargas5, Anton S Becker5,3, Borna K Barth3, Daniel Eberli6.   

Abstract

For clinically significant, locally confined prostate cancer, whole-gland radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy are established effective treatment strategies that, however, come at a cost of significant morbidity related to urinary and sexual side effects. The concept of risk stratification paired with a better understanding of prognostic factors has led to the development of alternative management options including active surveillance and focal therapy for appropriately selected patients with localized disease. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is one such minimally invasive, image-guided treatment option for prostate cancer. Due to the relative novelty of HIFU and the increased use of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer, many radiologists are not yet familiar with imaging findings related to HIFU, their temporal evolution as well as imaging appearance of recurrent disease after this type of focal therapy. HIFU induces sharply demarcated, localized coagulative necrosis of a tumor through thermal energy delivered via an endorectal or transurethral ultrasound transducer. In this pictorial review, we aim at providing relevant background information that will guide the reader through the general principles of HIFU in the prostate, as well as demonstrate the imaging appearance of expected post-HIFU changes versus recurrent tumor.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Focal therapy; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32447414     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02577-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  56 in total

1.  A precise and fast temperature mapping using water proton chemical shift.

Authors:  Y Ishihara; A Calderon; H Watanabe; K Okamoto; Y Suzuki; K Kuroda; Y Suzuki
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Comparison of acute and late toxicities for three modern high-dose radiation treatment techniques for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nasiruddin Mohammed; Larry Kestin; Mihai Ghilezan; Daniel Krauss; Frank Vicini; Donald Brabbins; Gary Gustafson; Hong Ye; Alavaro Martinez
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with MRI image fusion for monitoring focal therapy of prostate cancer with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)1.

Authors:  M Apfelbeck; D-A Clevert; J Ricke; C Stief; B Schlenker
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy versus external-beam radiotherapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephen A Boorjian; R Jeffrey Karnes; Rosalia Viterbo; Laureano J Rangel; Eric J Bergstralh; Eric M Horwitz; Michael L Blute; Mark K Buyyounouski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  MRI methods for the evaluation of high intensity focused ultrasound tumor treatment: Current status and future needs.

Authors:  Stefanie J C G Hectors; Igor Jacobs; Chrit T W Moonen; Gustav J Strijkers; Klaas Nicolay
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).

Authors:  Jack Barkin
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.344

Review 7.  Contemporary treatments in prostate cancer focal therapy.

Authors:  Michael Ahdoot; Amir H Lebastchi; Baris Turkbey; Bradford Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.645

8.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study.

Authors:  Meelan Bul; Xiaoye Zhu; Riccardo Valdagni; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Antti Rannikko; Anders Bjartell; Deric K van der Schoot; Erik B Cornel; Giario N Conti; Egbert R Boevé; Frédéric Staerman; Jenneke J Vis-Maters; Henk Vergunst; Joris J Jaspars; Petra Strölin; Erik van Muilekom; Fritz H Schröder; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  MR imaging of prostate after treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Alexander P S Kirkham; Mark Emberton; Ivan M Hoh; Rowland O Illing; A Alex Freeman; Clare Allen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Multiparametric MRI for Suspected Recurrent Prostate Cancer after HIFU:Is DCE still needed?

Authors:  Raïssa Lotte; Alexandre Lafourcade; Pierre Mozer; Pierre Conort; Eric Barret; Eva Comperat; Malek Ezziane; Paul-Hugo Jouve de Guibert; Sebastian Tavolaro; Lisa Belin; Franck Boudghene; Olivier Lucidarme; Raphaële Renard-Penna
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The role of MRI in prostate cancer: current and future directions.

Authors:  Maria Clara Fernandes; Onur Yildirim; Sungmin Woo; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.533

2.  Triggers and oncologic outcome of salvage radical prostatectomy, salvage radiotherapy and active surveillance after focal therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jost von Hardenberg; Hannes Cash; Daniel Koch; Angelika Borkowetz; Johannes Bruendl; Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah; Timur H Kuru; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Daniel Schindele; Katharina S Mala; Niklas Westhoff; Andreas Blana; Martin Schostak
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.