| Literature DB >> 29489989 |
Naruna Pereira Rocha1, Mariana De Santis Filgueiras1, Fernanda Martins de Albuquerque1, Luana Cupertino Milagres1, Ana Paula Pereira Castro1, Mariane Alves Silva1, Glauce Dias da Costa2, Silvia Eloiza Priore2, Juliana Farias de Novaes2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the implementation of the Brazilian National School Feeding Program as a food and nutritional security policy in public schools. METHODS This a cross-sectional study, with a quantitative and qualitative approach, carried out with 268 schoolchildren aged eight to nine years from the public school system of Viçosa, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, in 2015. Interviews were carried out using semi-structured questionnaires with the children, parents, cooks, nutritionists, trainer of the Technical Assistance and Rural Extension Company, and president of the School Feeding Council. In order to analyze the implementation of the National School Feeding Program in Viçosa, we evaluated the direct weighing of the food served in the schools using mechanical balances with a capacity of up to 10 kg and the perception of the social players involved in the implementation of the National School Feeding Program. The children were questioned about the acceptance of and adherence to the food offered, in addition to the habit of bringing food from home. Parents reported knowledge about the School Feeding Program and Council. The qualitative analysis consisted of content analysis and quantitative analysis using the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and Mann-Whitney test. We adopted the statistical significance of 5% for quantitative analysis. RESULTS Children reported low adherence to the school feeding program and most of them used to bring food from home. Irregularities were identified in the implementation of the National School Feeding Program, such as: inadequate number of nutritionists, suspension of Council meetings, inadequate infrastructure in the areas of preparation and distribution of meals, lack of training of cooks, lack of nutritional adequacy of the food offered, and lack of actions on food and nutritional education. The Program complied with the recommendations for purchasing food from family farms. CONCLUSIONS The National School Feeding Program presented many irregularities in Viçosa. It is important to monitor the problems identified for better reformulation and planning of the Program, in order to guarantee the food and nutritional security of the children served.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29489989 PMCID: PMC5825126 DOI: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052007090
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Saude Publica ISSN: 0034-8910 Impact factor: 2.106
Perception of children regarding school feeding according to the type of school. Viçosa, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2015.
| Variable | Total | Schools | p | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Municipal | State | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| Frequency of consumption | |||||||
| No | 65 | 24.3 | 21 | 32.3 | 44 | 67.7 | 0.020* |
| ≤ 3 times a week | 106 | 39.6 | 48 | 45.3 | 58 | 54.7 | |
| ≥ 4 times a week | 97 | 36.1 | 53 | 54.6 | 44 | 45.4 | |
| Perception of the food | |||||||
| Very good/Good | 162 | 79.4 | 84 | 51.9 | 78 | 48.1 | 0.262 |
| Regular/Bad | 42 | 20.6 | 18 | 42.9 | 24 | 57.1 | |
| Satisfactory amount served | |||||||
| Yes | 185 | 91.1 | 94 | 50.8 | 91 | 49.2 | 0.030* |
| No | 18 | 8.9 | 7 | 38.9 | 11 | 61.1 | |
| Considered as important | |||||||
| Yes | 231 | 86.2 | 109 | 47.2 | 122 | 52.8 | 0.172 |
| No | 37 | 13.8 | 13 | 35.1 | 24 | 64.9 | |
| Food brought from home | |||||||
| Never | 55 | 20.5 | 33 | 60.0 | 22 | 40.0 | 0.005* |
| Sometimes | 172 | 64.2 | 78 | 45.3 | 94 | 54.7 | |
| Always | 41 | 15.3 | 11 | 26.8 | 30 | 73.2 | |
* Pearson’s chi-square test.
Perception of the parents regarding school feeding according to the type of school. Viçosa, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2015.
| Variable | Total | Schools | p | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Municipal | State | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| Knowledge on the PNAEa | |||||||
| Yes | 108 | 40.3 | 52 | 48.2 | 56 | 51.8 | 0.727 |
| No | 160 | 59.7 | 70 | 43.8 | 90 | 56.2 | |
| Perception of the school feedingb | |||||||
| Positive | 115 | 87.8 | 58 | 50.4 | 57 | 49.6 | 0.081 |
| Negative | 10 | 7.6 | 5 | 50.0 | 5 | 50.0 | |
| Absence of school feedingb | |||||||
| Yes | 18 | 6.7 | 16 | 88.9 | 2 | 11.1 | 0.001 |
| No | 243 | 90.7 | 104 | 42.8 | 139 | 57.2 | |
| Knowledge on the CAEa | |||||||
| Yes | 26 | 9.7 | 7 | 27.0 | 19 | 73.0 | 0.045 |
| No | 242 | 90.3 | 115 | 47.5 | 127 | 52.5 | |
PNAE: National School Feeding Program; CAE: School Feeding Council
a Pearson’s chi-square test.
b Fisher’s exact test.
Technical-organizational structure for the storage, preparation, and distribution of school feeding, according to the type of school. Viçosa, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2015.
| Variable | Total | Schools | p | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Municipal | State | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| Place of storage | |||||||
| Adequate | 7 | 41.2 | 4 | 57.1 | 3 | 42.9 | 0.646 |
| Inadequatea | 10 | 58.8 | 6 | 60.0 | 4 | 40.0 | |
| Presence of cafeteria | |||||||
| No | 10 | 58.8 | 8 | 80.0 | 2 | 20.0 | 0.052 |
| Yes | 7 | 41.2 | 2 | 28.6 | 5 | 71.4 | |
| Enough furniture | |||||||
| Yes | 3 | 17.6 | 2 | 66.7 | 1 | 33.3 | 0.640 |
| No | 14 | 82.4 | 8 | 57.1 | 6 | 42.9 | |
| Control of temperature | |||||||
| Yes | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| No | 17 | 100 | 10 | 58.8 | 7 | 41.2 | |
| Place of preparation | |||||||
| Adequate | 7 | 41.2 | 5 | 71.4 | 2 | 28.6 | 0.354 |
| Inadequatea | 10 | 58.8 | 5 | 50.0 | 5 | 50.0 | |
| Place of distribution | |||||||
| Adequate | 10 | 58.8 | 4 | 40.0 | 6 | 60.0 | 0.082 |
| Inadequatea | 7 | 41.2 | 6 | 85.7 | 1 | 14.3 | |
| Conservation of furniture, walls, floors, and ceilings | |||||||
| Satisfactory | 10 | 58.8 | 6 | 60.0 | 4 | 40.0 | 0.640 |
| Unsatisfactory | 7 | 41.2 | 4 | 57.1 | 3 | 42.9 | |
| Place to wash hands | |||||||
| Yes | 5 | 29.4 | 4 | 80.0 | 1 | 20.0 | 0.278 |
| No | 12 | 70.6 | 6 | 50.0 | 6 | 50.0 | |
| Hygiene of the area of production and distribution | |||||||
| Satisfactory | 13 | 76.5 | 6 | 46.2 | 7 | 53.8 | 0.088 |
| Unsatisfactory | 4 | 23.5 | 4 | 100 | - | - | |
| Exposure of the menu | |||||||
| Yes | 9 | 52.9 | 1 | 20.0 | 4 | 80.0 | |
| No | 8 | 47.1 | 9 | 75.0 | 3 | 25.0 | 0.581 |
a Lighting/ventilation/hygiene.
All analyzes were performed by Fisher’s exact test.
Median, minimum, and maximum values for energy and nutrients of the menus offered in the school feeding of municipal and state public schools. Viçosa, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2015.
| Energy and nutrients | PNAE* | Municipal schools | State schools | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 6 to 10 years | Median | Min–Max | Median | Min–Max | p | |
| Energy (kcal) | 300 | 207.58 | 81.30–427.60 | 202.20 | 162.20–284.60 | 0.558 |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 48.8 | 36.51 | 15.60–69.80 | 32.00 | 20.60–44.60 | 0.329 |
| Protein (g) | 9.4 | 7.16 | 1.70–14.10 | 7.90 | 4.60–16.70 | 0.354 |
| Lipids (g) | 7.5 | 4.71 | 1.30–13.40 | 4.40 | 1.88–13.30 | 0.845 |
| Fiber (g) | 5.4 | 3.02 | 0.70–10.34 | 2.47 | 1.40–6.30 | 0.695 |
| Vitamin A (ug) | 100 | 63.45 | 15.00–203.80 | 118.80 | 0.0–20210 | 0.283 |
| Vitamin C (mg) | 7.0 | 2.46 | 0.60–16.40 | 1.60 | 0.00–4.50 | 0.407 |
| Calcium (mg) | 210 | 52.85 | 7.20–203.30 | 21.20 | 17.58–38.10 | 0.079 |
| Iron (mg) | 1.8 | 1.70 | 0.20–2.70 | 1.00 | 0.80–1.70 | 0.184 |
| Zinc (mg) | 1.3 | 1.00 | 0.30–1.50 | 1.00 | 0.60–2.20 | 0.118 |
| Magnesium (mg) | 37 | 28.20 | 17.10–93.90 | 52.90 | 29.10–64.60 | 0.728 |
PNAE: National School Feeding Program; Min: minimum; Max: maximum
* Reference of the recommendations that establishes the minimum offer of 20% of daily nutritional needs when a meal is offered for students who study part time, according to Resolution 026/2013.
All analyzes were performed by Mann-Whitney test.