Literature DB >> 29485114

An individual-level selection model for the apparent altruism exhibited by cellular slime moulds.

Amotz Zahavi1, Keith D Harris, Vidyanand Nanjundiah.   

Abstract

In Dictyostelium discoideum, cells that become part of the stalk or basal disc display behaviour that can be interpreted as altruistic. Atzmony et al. (Curr Sci 72:142-145, 1997) had hypothesised that this behaviour could be the outcome of an adaptive strategy based on differing intrinsic quality as reflected by phenotypes that indicate differences in potential for survival and reproduction, followed by intercellular competition among amoebae of differing qualities. Low-quality amoebae would have a poor chance of succeeding in the competition to form spores; they could enhance their chances of survival by adopting a presumptive stalk strategy. Here we extend the hypothesis by making use of recent findings. Our approach is based on the view that an evolutionary explanation for the apparent altruism of stalk cells in D. discoideum must apply broadly to other cellular slime moulds (CSMs) that exhibit stalk cell death. Further, it must be capable of being modified to cover social behaviour in CSMs with an extracellular stalk, as well as in sorocarpic amoebae whose stalk cells are viable. With regard to D. discoideum, we suggest that (a) differentiation-inducing factor, thought of as a signal that inhibits amoebae from forming spores and induces them to differentiate into basal disc cells, is better viewed as a mediator of competition among post-aggregation amoebae and (b) the products of the 'recognition genes', tgrB and tgrC, allow an amoeba to assess its quality relative to that of its neighbours and move to a position within the aggregate that optimises its reproductive fitness. From this perspective, all cells behave in a manner that is 'selfish' rather than 'altruistic', albeit with different expectations of success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29485114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosci        ISSN: 0250-5991            Impact factor:   1.826


  56 in total

1.  A novel developmental mechanism in Dictyostelium revealed in a screen for communication mutants.

Authors:  Kirsten Kibler; Tu-Lan Nguyen; Jessica Svetz; Nancy Van Driessche; Miroslava Ibarra; Christopher Thompson; Chad Shaw; Gad Shaulsky
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  High relatedness maintains multicellular cooperation in a social amoeba by controlling cheater mutants.

Authors:  Owen M Gilbert; Kevin R Foster; Natasha J Mehdiabadi; Joan E Strassmann; David C Queller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cell sorting out during the differentiation of mixtures of metabolically distinct populations of Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  C K Leach; J M Ashworth; D R Garrod
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1973-06

4.  Tip regeneration and positional information in the slug of Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  B L Lokeshwar; V Nanjundiah
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1983-02

5.  Chemical structure of the morphogen differentiation inducing factor from Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  H R Morris; G W Taylor; M S Masento; K A Jermyn; R R Kay
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Aug 27-Sep 2       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Cheating does not explain selective differences at high and low relatedness in a social amoeba.

Authors:  Gerda Saxer; Debra A Brock; David C Queller; Joan E Strassmann
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  The trishanku gene and terminal morphogenesis in Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  Nameeta Mujumdar; Kei Inouye; Vidyanand Nanjundiah
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.930

8.  Biosynthesis of Dictyostelium discoideum differentiation-inducing factor by a hybrid type I fatty acid-type III polyketide synthase.

Authors:  Michael B Austin; Tamao Saito; Marianne E Bowman; Stephen Haydock; Atsushi Kato; Bradley S Moore; Robert R Kay; Joseph P Noel
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2006-08-13       Impact factor: 15.040

9.  Experimental evolution reveals that high relatedness protects multicellular cooperation from cheaters.

Authors:  Eric Bastiaans; Alfons J M Debets; Duur K Aanen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Analysis of cell movement during the culmination phase of Dictyostelium development.

Authors:  D Dormann; F Siegert; C J Weijer
Journal:  Development       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  1 in total

1.  Genetic signatures of microbial altruism and cheating in social amoebas in the wild.

Authors:  Suegene Noh; Katherine S Geist; Xiangjun Tian; Joan E Strassmann; David C Queller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.