Literature DB >> 29507206

Genetic signatures of microbial altruism and cheating in social amoebas in the wild.

Suegene Noh1,2, Katherine S Geist1, Xiangjun Tian3,4, Joan E Strassmann1, David C Queller5.   

Abstract

Many microbes engage in social interactions. Some of these have come to play an important role in the study of cooperation and conflict, largely because, unlike most animals, they can be genetically manipulated and experimentally evolved. However, whereas animal social behavior can be observed and assessed in natural environments, microbes usually cannot, so we know little about microbial social adaptations in nature. This has led to some difficult-to-resolve controversies about social adaptation even for well-studied traits such as bacterial quorum sensing, siderophore production, and biofilms. Here we use molecular signatures of population genetics and molecular evolution to address controversies over the existence of altruism and cheating in social amoebas. First, we find signatures of rapid adaptive molecular evolution that are consistent with social conflict being a significant force in nature. Second, we find population-genetic signatures of purifying selection to support the hypothesis that the cells that form the sterile stalk evolve primarily through altruistic kin selection rather than through selfish direct reproduction. Our results show how molecular signatures can provide insight into social adaptations that cannot be observed in their natural context, and they support the hypotheses that social amoebas in the wild are both altruists and cheaters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dictyostelium discoideum; altruism; cheating; kin selection; social amoeba

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29507206      PMCID: PMC5866591          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1720324115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  74 in total

1.  Positive and negative selection on the human genome.

Authors:  J C Fay; G J Wyckoff; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Histocompatibility as adaptive response to discriminatory within-organism conflict: a historical model.

Authors:  Owen M Gilbert
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Concurrent coevolution of intra-organismal cheaters and resisters.

Authors:  S R Levin; D A Brock; D C Queller; J E Strassmann
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Self-recognition in social amoebae is mediated by allelic pairs of tiger genes.

Authors:  Shigenori Hirose; Rocio Benabentos; Hsing-I Ho; Adam Kuspa; Gad Shaulsky
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Conserved developmental transcriptomes in evolutionarily divergent species.

Authors:  Anup Parikh; Edward Roshan Miranda; Mariko Katoh-Kurasawa; Danny Fuller; Gregor Rot; Lan Zagar; Tomaz Curk; Richard Sucgang; Rui Chen; Blaz Zupan; William F Loomis; Adam Kuspa; Gad Shaulsky
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genome wide analyses reveal little evidence for adaptive evolution in many plant species.

Authors:  Toni I Gossmann; Bao-Hua Song; Aaron J Windsor; Thomas Mitchell-Olds; Christopher J Dixon; Maxim V Kapralov; Dmitry A Filatov; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  An evolutionarily significant unicellular strategy in response to starvation stress in Dictyostelium social amoebae.

Authors:  Darja Dubravcic; Minus van Baalen; Clément Nizak
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-06-24
View more
  8 in total

1.  What life is for: a commentary on Fromhage and Jennions.

Authors:  David Queller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Discrimination Experiments in Entamoeba and Evidence from Other Protists Suggest Pathogenic Amebas Cooperate with Kin to Colonize Hosts and Deter Rivals.

Authors:  Avelina Espinosa; Guillermo Paz-Y-Miño-C
Journal:  J Eukaryot Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 3.  Ten recent insights for our understanding of cooperation.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Guy A Cooper; Melanie B Ghoul; Ashleigh S Griffin
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Conditional expression explains molecular evolution of social genes in a microbe.

Authors:  Janaina Lima de Oliveira; Atahualpa Castillo Morales; Balint Stewart; Nicole Gruenheit; Jennifer Engelmoer; Suzanne Battom Brown; Reinaldo A de Brito; Laurence D Hurst; Araxi O Urrutia; Christopher R L Thompson; Jason B Wolf
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Variation at an adhesin locus suggests sociality in natural populations of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Zachary J Oppler; Meadow E Parrish; Helen A Murphy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Topological constraints in early multicellularity favor reproductive division of labor.

Authors:  David Yanni; Shane Jacobeen; William C Ratcliff; Peter J Yunker; Pedro Márquez-Zacarías; Joshua S Weitz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Kin selection for cooperation in natural bacterial populations.

Authors:  Laurence J Belcher; Anna E Dewar; Melanie Ghoul; Stuart A West
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  Pleiotropy, cooperation, and the social evolution of genetic architecture.

Authors:  Miguel Dos Santos; Melanie Ghoul; Stuart A West
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 8.029

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.