Literature DB >> 29484162

Reassessing the value of gastroscopy for the investigation of dyspepsia.

Hey-Long Ching1, Melissa F Hale1, Reena Sidhu1, Mark E McAlindon1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of investigating dyspepsia with oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) with or without mucosal biopsy.
DESIGN: Retrospective service evaluation study.
SETTING: Two teaching hospitals: The Royal Hallamshire Hospital and Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK. PATIENTS: 500 patients, 55 years of age and over, who underwent OGD to investigate dyspepsia were included. The study period included a 3-month window. All OGDs were performed on an outpatient basis.
INTERVENTIONS: Data were extracted from electronic OGD records within the study period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic yield provided by endoscopic examination and histological assessment.
RESULTS: 378 patients (75.6%) were reported to have some form of endoscopic abnormality, and 417 patients (83.4%) had biopsies taken. The most common findings at OGD were gastritis (47.2%) and oesophagitis (24.4%). Oesophagogastric malignancy was seen in 1%. Diagnoses made endoscopically or histologically that would not have been appropriately managed by empirical therapies were seen in 16.2%.
CONCLUSION: OGD in dyspepsia influences patient management in approximately one-sixth of cases. However, the majority of patients are sufficiently managed with Helicobacter pylori testing and eradication and/or a trial of proton pump inhibitor therapy. Further non-invasive approaches are needed to identify patients who need endoscopy for biopsy or therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dyspepsia; gastrointesinal endoscopy; gastroscopy

Year:  2017        PMID: 29484162      PMCID: PMC5824766          DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2017-100838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2041-4137


  34 in total

1.  Patients' attitudes and apprehensions about endoscopy: how to calm troubled waters.

Authors:  L J Brandt
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the Role of Upper Gastrointestinal Biopsy to Evaluate Dyspepsia in the Adult Patient in the Absence of Visible Mucosal Lesions.

Authors:  John I Allen; David Katzka; Marie Robert; Grigorios I Leontiadis
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  The role of endoscopy in dyspepsia.

Authors:  Aasma Shaukat; Amy Wang; Ruben D Acosta; David H Bruining; Vinay Chandrasekhara; Krishnavel V Chathadi; Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Robert D Fanelli; Ashley L Faulx; Lisa Fonkalsrud; Suryakanth R Gurudu; Loralee R Kelsey; Mouen A Khashab; Shivangi Kothari; Jenifer R Lightdale; V Raman Muthusamy; Shabana F Pasha; John R Saltzman; Julie Yang; Brooks D Cash; John M DeWitt
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  A Panel of Serum Biomarkers (GastroPanel®) in Non-invasive Diagnosis of Atrophic Gastritis. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kari Syrjänen
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.480

5.  Predicting patient tolerance of endoscopy with conscious sedation.

Authors:  Simon Hazeldine; Lin Fritschi; Geoff Forbes
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Low Yield and High Cost of Gastric and Duodenal Biopsies for Investigation of Symptoms of Abdominal Pain During Routine Esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  Eric M Nelsen; Abby Lochmann-Bailkey; Ian C Grimes; Mark E Benson; Deepak V Gopal; Patrick R Pfau
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Adenoma miss rates associated with a 3-minute versus 6-minute colonoscopy withdrawal time: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Sheila Kumar; Nirav Thosani; Uri Ladabaum; Shai Friedland; Ann M Chen; Rajan Kochar; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Meta-analysis: the diagnostic value of alarm symptoms for upper gastrointestinal malignancy.

Authors:  G A J Fransen; M J R Janssen; J W M Muris; R J F Laheij; J B M J Jansen
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of age and alarm symptoms for upper GI malignancy in patients with dyspepsia in a GI clinic: a 7-year cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hooman Khademi; Amir-Reza Radmard; Fatemeh Malekzadeh; Farin Kamangar; Siavosh Nasseri-Moghaddam; Mattias Johansson; Graham Byrnes; Paul Brennan; Reza Malekzadeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Polyp detection rate in transverse and sigmoid colon significantly increases with longer withdrawal time during screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kashiwagi; Nagamu Inoue; Toshifumi Yoshida; Rieko Bessyo; Kazuaki Yoneno; Hiroyuki Imaeda; Haruhiko Ogata; Takanori Kanai; Yoshinori Sugino; Yasushi Iwao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of patient tolerance and acceptability of magnet-controlled capsule endoscopy and flexible endoscopy in the investigation of dyspepsia.

Authors:  Foong Way David Tai; Hey Long Ching; Marion Sloan; Reena Sidhu; Mark McAlindon
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  Upper gastrointestinal tract capsule endoscopy using a nurse-led protocol: First reported experience.

Authors:  Hey-Long Ching; Ailish Healy; Victoria Thurston; Melissa F Hale; Reena Sidhu; Mark E McAlindon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Cost-effectiveness modelling of use of urea breath test for the management of Helicobacter pylori-related dyspepsia and peptic ulcer in the UK.

Authors:  D Mark Pritchard; Jan Bornschein; Ian Beales; Ariel Beresniak; Hocine Salhi; Peter Malfertheiner
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.