Literature DB >> 20560818

Predicting patient tolerance of endoscopy with conscious sedation.

Simon Hazeldine1, Lin Fritschi, Geoff Forbes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the adequacy of benzodiazepine/opiate sedation for endoscopic procedures and to identify patient and procedure characteristics that may predict poor procedural tolerance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2155 patients who underwent sedated gastroscopy, colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy between January and December 2007, participated in the prospective evaluation of procedural tolerance and the procedures were evaluated using three questionnaires completed by the patient, endoscopist and assisting nurse. Perception of procedural tolerance was scored using a 100-point visual analog scale (VAS), 0: very good to 100: very poorly. In order to identify patient and procedure characteristics predictive of poor procedural tolerance, we compared 10% of patients who tolerated the procedure least well with the remaining patients.
RESULTS: About 216 (10%) of 2155 patients gave a VAS score of >30, and were compared with the 1939 patients with a VAS <30. Patients who tolerated the procedure least well (VAS ≥30) were more likely female [odds ratio (OR) 2.8, 95% confidence interval 1.9-4.1], had colonoscopy (OR 2.9, 1.8-4.5) or had a training endoscopist perform the procedure (OR 3.2, 2.2-4.8). Patients with BMI ≥35 were also more likely to have a VAS ≥30 (p < 0.01). Sedation type and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade had no significant effect on patient tolerance.
CONCLUSIONS: A majority of patients tolerate endoscopic procedures well when benzodiazepine/opiate sedation is used. Accurately identifying the minority who tolerate these procedures less well remains difficult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20560818     DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2010.497939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  10 in total

1.  Unsedated transnasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has favorable diagnostic effectiveness, cardiopulmonary safety, and patient satisfaction compared with conventional or sedated endoscopy.

Authors:  Zheng-Lin Ai; Chun-Hui Lan; Li-Lin Fan; Li Lan; Yan Cao; Ping Li; Ou Song; Dong-Feng Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Acupuncture to Improve Patient Discomfort During Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ning Gao; Huan Chen; Yang Wang; Yufeng Guo; Zhishun Liu; Weiming Wang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-03

3.  Safety of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing examination in gastroenterological practice.

Authors:  Tae Hee Lee; Joon Seong Lee
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Factors Associated with Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Occurrence After Endoscopy that Did Not Diagnose Cancer.

Authors:  Danny Cheung; Shyam Menon; Jonathan Hoare; Anjan Dhar; Nigel Trudgill
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with conscious sedation does not interfere with catheter-based 24-h pH monitoring.

Authors:  Yung-Kuan Tsou; Jau-Min Lien; Chin-Kuo Chen; Cheng-Hui Lin; Hsing-Yu Chen; Mu-Shien Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Information seeking and anxiety among colonoscopy-naïve adults: Direct-to-colonoscopy vs traditional consult-first pathways.

Authors:  Jocelyn A Silvester; Harmandeep Kalkat; Lesley A Graff; John R Walker; Harminder Singh; Donald R Duerksen
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-11-16

7.  Surgical Grade and Repeat Laser Peripheral Iridotomy Procedures with Risk Stratification and Educational Considerations.

Authors:  Oliver Francis Riley; Sunil Mamtora; Emma Carroll; Jon Luck
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-08

8.  Do difficulties in emotional processing predict procedure pain and shape the patient's colonoscopy experience?

Authors:  Stefano Pontone; Marco Lauriola; Rossella Palma; Cristina Panetta; Manuela Tomai; Roger Baker
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Reassessing the value of gastroscopy for the investigation of dyspepsia.

Authors:  Hey-Long Ching; Melissa F Hale; Reena Sidhu; Mark E McAlindon
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-05

10.  Clinical analysis of moderate-to-deep-sedation by nonmedical sedation practitioners in 597 patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Hermanus Vaessen; Elisabeth Bruens; Johannes Knape
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-04-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.