PURPOSE: To compare corneal tomography and its statistical uncertainty for measurements obtained by three clinically used corneal tomographers: A Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR), a swept source optical coherence tomography system (CASIA SS-1000), and Placido ring imaging (TMS-5). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Repeated measurements with all three devices on 34 normal eyes were used to estimate the repeatability, precision, and mean values of corneal elevation and pachymetry within 8 mm diameter. The repeatability (standard deviation) was calculated for each data point of the corneal elevation data-maps of anterior and posterior cornea as well as for the pachymetry data-maps. Uncertainty on the position of the eye at each measurement might contribute to the differences between elevation data-maps. To take this into account, we defined the precision as the standard deviation for the elevation data-maps of anterior and posterior cornea after correction of misalignment-effects (rotation, translation). The mean elevation and pachymetry data-maps were fitted with Zernike polynomials for interdevice-comparison. RESULTS: Pentacam HR offered the best repeatability and precision for the anterior corneal elevation (<3 and <1.6 μm, respectively). CASIA SS-1000 offered good repeatability and precision with high resolution for posterior corneal elevation, and the best repeatability for pachymetry (<3 μm). TMS-5 measured anterior elevation with similar repeatability to CASIA SS-1000 (<6 μm). The data-maps of the three tomographers could not be used interchangeably. The largest differences were observed for pachymetry and posterior corneal elevation data-maps. CONCLUSIONS: Misalignment limited the repeatability of TMS-5 and Pentacam HR, but had little influence on the repeatability of CASIA SS-1000.
PURPOSE: To compare corneal tomography and its statistical uncertainty for measurements obtained by three clinically used corneal tomographers: A Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR), a swept source optical coherence tomography system (CASIA SS-1000), and Placido ring imaging (TMS-5). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Repeated measurements with all three devices on 34 normal eyes were used to estimate the repeatability, precision, and mean values of corneal elevation and pachymetry within 8 mm diameter. The repeatability (standard deviation) was calculated for each data point of the corneal elevation data-maps of anterior and posterior cornea as well as for the pachymetry data-maps. Uncertainty on the position of the eye at each measurement might contribute to the differences between elevation data-maps. To take this into account, we defined the precision as the standard deviation for the elevation data-maps of anterior and posterior cornea after correction of misalignment-effects (rotation, translation). The mean elevation and pachymetry data-maps were fitted with Zernike polynomials for interdevice-comparison. RESULTS: Pentacam HR offered the best repeatability and precision for the anterior corneal elevation (<3 and <1.6 μm, respectively). CASIA SS-1000 offered good repeatability and precision with high resolution for posterior corneal elevation, and the best repeatability for pachymetry (<3 μm). TMS-5 measured anterior elevation with similar repeatability to CASIA SS-1000 (<6 μm). The data-maps of the three tomographers could not be used interchangeably. The largest differences were observed for pachymetry and posterior corneal elevation data-maps. CONCLUSIONS: Misalignment limited the repeatability of TMS-5 and Pentacam HR, but had little influence on the repeatability of CASIA SS-1000.