Anna E Jaffe1, Kaitlin E Bountress2, Isha W Metzger3, Jessica L Maples-Keller4, Hanna T Pinsky5, William H George6, Amanda K Gilmore7. 1. National Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States. 2. Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, United States. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30307, United States. 5. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States. 6. Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States. 7. National Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States. Electronic address: gilmoram@musc.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate individual engagement and comfort during a web-based intervention for alcohol and sexual assault risk reduction. METHODS:Participants were 264 college women (aged 18-20) who reported engaging in heavy episodic drinking in the past month. Participants were randomized to either an intervention condition (alcohol, sexual assault risk reduction, or combined) or a control condition (full or minimal assessment). Participants rated their experiences during the procedures following the assessment or receipt of the intervention depending on condition. Survey usage information (e.g., time data, completion of intervention) was automatically recorded. RESULTS: Most participants completed the intervention as intended (in a reasonable amount of time, in private, without consuming substances). Women with a sexual assault history were most comfortable in the sexual assault risk reduction intervention, whereas women who frequently engaged in heavy episodic drinking were least comfortable in the alcohol intervention condition. Self-reported distraction was not impacted by personal relevance of the intervention, but was associated with setting of participation. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that most college women completed web-based personalized feedback interventions as designed, despite minimal discomfort.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate individual engagement and comfort during a web-based intervention for alcohol and sexual assault risk reduction. METHODS:Participants were 264 college women (aged 18-20) who reported engaging in heavy episodic drinking in the past month. Participants were randomized to either an intervention condition (alcohol, sexual assault risk reduction, or combined) or a control condition (full or minimal assessment). Participants rated their experiences during the procedures following the assessment or receipt of the intervention depending on condition. Survey usage information (e.g., time data, completion of intervention) was automatically recorded. RESULTS: Most participants completed the intervention as intended (in a reasonable amount of time, in private, without consuming substances). Women with a sexual assault history were most comfortable in the sexual assault risk reduction intervention, whereas women who frequently engaged in heavy episodic drinking were least comfortable in the alcohol intervention condition. Self-reported distraction was not impacted by personal relevance of the intervention, but was associated with setting of participation. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that most college women completed web-based personalized feedback interventions as designed, despite minimal discomfort.
Authors: Clayton Neighbors; Melissa A Lewis; David C Atkins; Megan M Jensen; Theresa Walter; Nicole Fossos; Christine M Lee; Mary E Larimer Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2010-12
Authors: Mick P Couper; Gwen L Alexander; Nanhua Zhang; Roderick J A Little; Noel Maddy; Michael A Nowak; Jennifer B McClure; Josephine J Calvi; Sharon J Rolnick; Melanie A Stopponi; Christine Cole Johnson Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2010-11-18 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Elizabeth Murray; Ian R White; Mira Varagunam; Christine Godfrey; Zarnie Khadjesari; Jim McCambridge Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Anna E Jaffe; Jessica A Blayney; Scott Graupensperger; Cynthia A Stappenbeck; Michele Bedard-Gilligan; Mary Larimer Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2021-08-26