Literature DB >> 29475110

Pathological fracture risk assessment in patients with femoral metastases using CT-based finite element methods. A retrospective clinical study.

Amir Sternheim1, Ornit Giladi2, Yair Gortzak1, Michael Drexler2, Moshe Salai2, Nir Trabelsi3, Charles Milgrom4, Zohar Yosibash5.   

Abstract

Physician recommendation for prophylactic surgical fixation of a femur with metastatic bone disease (MBD) is usually based on Mirels' criteria and clinical experience, both of which suffer from poor specificity. This may result in a significant number of these health compromised patients undergoing unnecessary surgery. CT-based finite element analyses (CTFEA) have been shown to accurately predict strength in femurs with metastatic tumors in an ex-vivo study. In order to assess the utility of CTFEA as a clinical tool to determine the need for fixation of patients with MBD of the femur, an ad hoc CTFEA was performed on a retrospective cohort of fifty patients. Patients with CT scans appropriate for CTFEA analysis were analyzed. Group 1 was composed of 5 MBD patients who presented with a pathologic femoral fracture and had a scan of their femurs just prior to fracture. Group 2 was composed of 45 MBD patients who were scheduled for a prophylactic surgery because of an impending femoral fracture. CTFEA models were constructed for both femurs for all patients, loaded with a hip contact force representing stance position loading accounting for the patient's weight and femur anatomy. CTFEA analysis of Group 1 patients revealed that they all had higher tumor associated strains compared to typical non-diseased femur bone strains at the same region (>45%). Based on analysis of the 5 patients in Group 1, the ratio between the absolute maximum principal strain in the vicinity of the tumor and the typical median strain in the region of the tumor of healthy bones (typical strain fold ratio) was found to be the 1.48. This was considered to be the predictive threshold for a pathological femoral fracture. Based on this typical strain fold ratio, twenty patients (44.4%) in Group 2 were at low risk of fracture and twenty-five patients (55.5%) high risk of fracture. Eleven patients in Group 2 choose not to have surgery and none fractured in the 5month follow-up period. CTFEA predicted that seven of these patients were below the pathological fracture threshold and four above, for a specificity of 63% Based on CTFEA, 39% of the patients with femoral MBD who were referred and underwent prophylactic stabilization may not have needed surgery. These results indicate that a prospective randomized clinical trial evaluating CTFEA as a criterion for determining the need for surgical stabilization in patients with MBD of the femur may be warranted.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CTFEA; Femur; Finite element analysis; Metastases; Pathological fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29475110     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  16 in total

Review 1.  Fracture risk assessment and clinical decision making for patients with metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  Timothy A Damron; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Can Patient-specific Finite Element Models Enter Clinical Practice as a Decision Support System?

Authors:  Azadeh Ghouchani; Mohammad H Ebrahimzadeh
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-01

3.  Influence of bone lesion location on femoral bone strength assessed by MRI-based finite-element modeling.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Nishtha Gupta; Marissa Evans; Hamza Alizai; Malika Shukurova; Abigail L Hong; Nicholas J Cruickshank; Nirmal Tejwani; Kenneth Egol; Stephen Honig; Gregory Chang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 4.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  Finite Element Assessment of Bone Fragility from Clinical Images.

Authors:  Enrico Schileo; Fulvia Taddei
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Prediction of Risk Factors for Pathological Fracture After Bone Tumor Biopsy Using Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Tadashi Iwai; Manabu Hoshi; Naoto Oebisu; Kumi Orita; Akiyoshi Shimatani; Naoki Takada; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.989

7.  CORR Insights®: Is There an Association Between Prophylactic Femur Stabilization and Survival in Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease?

Authors:  Timothy A Damron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Nonlinear voxel-based finite element model for strength assessment of healthy and metastatic proximal femurs.

Authors:  Amelie Sas; Nicholas Ohs; Esther Tanck; G Harry van Lenthe
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2020-04-01

Review 9.  Biomechanical Properties of Metastatically Involved Osteolytic Bone.

Authors:  Cari M Whyne; Dallis Ferguson; Allison Clement; Mohammedayaz Rangrez; Michael Hardisty
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Mirels Scores in Patients Undergoing Prophylactic Stabilization for Femoral Metastatic Bone Disease in the Veterans Administration Healthcare System.

Authors:  Duncan C Ramsey; Phillip W Lam; James Hayden; Yee-Cheen Doung; Kenneth R Gundle
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.