| Literature DB >> 29473846 |
Aida Salameh1, Roxana Schuster2, Ingo Dähnert3, Johannes Seeger4, Stefan Dhein5.
Abstract
Cardioplegic arrest during heart operations is often used in cardiac surgery. During cardioplegia, the heart is subjected to a global ischemia/reperfusion-injury. (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), one of the main ingredients of green tea, seems to be beneficial in various cardiac diseases. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate EGCG in a rabbit model of cardioplegic arrest. Twenty four mature Chinchilla rabbits were examined. Rabbit hearts were isolated and perfused according to Langendorff. After induction of cardioplegia (without and with 20 µmol/L EGCG, n = 6 each) the hearts maintained arrested for 90-min. Thereafter, the hearts were re-perfused for 60 min. During the entire experiment hemodynamic and functional data were assessed. At the end of each experiment, left ventricular samples were processed for ATP measurements and for histological analysis. Directly after cessation of cardioplegia, all hearts showed the same decline in systolic and diastolic function. However, hearts of the EGCG-group showed a significantly faster and better hemodynamic recovery during reperfusion. In addition, tissue ATP-levels were significantly higher in the EGCG-treated hearts. Histological analysis revealed that markers of nitrosative and oxidative stress were significantly lower in the EGCG group. Thus, addition of EGCG significantly protected the cardiac muscle from ischemia/reperfusion injury.Entities:
Keywords: EGCG; Langendorff; cardioplegia; ischemia/reperfusion injury
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29473846 PMCID: PMC5855850 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19020628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Upper Panel: Left ventricular pressure (LVP) in mmHg before (baseline) and during recovery from a 90 min period of cardioplegia. Cardioplegia was performed either without (white triangles, n = 6) or with addition of 20 µmol/L EGCG (black triangles, n = 6). Lower Panel: Pressure-rate-product (PRP) in mmHg/min before (baseline) and during recovery from a 90 min period of cardioplegia. Cardioplegia was performed either without (white triangles, n = 6) or with addition of 20 µmol/L EGCG (black triangles, n = 6). All data are given as means ± SEM. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between cardioplegia without EGCG versus control are indicated by #, significant differences between cardioplegia + EGCG versus control + EGCG by * and significant differences between cardioplegia without EGCG versus cardioplegia with EGCG by +.
Figure 2Upper Panel: Maximum contraction velocity (dp/dt max) in mmHg/s before (baseline) and during recovery from a 90 min period of cardioplegia. Cardioplegia was performed either without (white triangles, n = 6) or with addition of 20 µmol/L EGCG (black triangles, n = 6). Lower Panel: Maximum relaxation velocity (dp/dt min) in mmHg/s before (baseline) and during recovery from a 90 min period of cardioplegia. Cardioplegia was performed either without (white triangles, n = 6) or with addition of 20 µmol/L EGCG (black triangles, n = 6). All data are given as means ± SEM. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between cardioplegia without EGCG versus control are indicated by #, significant differences between cardioplegia + EGCG versus control + EGCG by * and significant differences between cardioplegia without EGCG versus cardioplegia with EGCG by +.
Physiological, biochemical and hemodynamic parameters.
| Parameters | Baseline | Reperfusion 5 min | Reperfusion 10 min | Reperfusion 20 min | Reperfusion 30 min | Reperfusion 60 min |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI (ms) | ||||||
| TAT (ms) | ||||||
| Vector similarity (%) | ||||||
| PQ (ms) | ||||||
| QRS (ms) | ||||||
| BCL (ms) | ||||||
| HR (min−1) | ||||||
| CF/PRP (µL/mmHg) | ||||||
| pO2art-ven (mmHg) | ||||||
| ATP content µg/g |
ARI activation recovery interval, TAT total activation time, PQ PQ interval, QRS QRS complex, BCL basic cycle length, HR heart rate, CF coronary flow, PRP pressure rate product, pO2art-ven difference of arterio-venous partial oxygen pressure, # significant differences versus control; * significant differences versus cardioplegia; § significant differences versus control + EGCG, (p < 0.05).
Figure 3(A) Staining and quantification of HIF1α (hypoxia-inducible factor 1α) translocation. Bar graphs depict the percentage of nuclei positively stained for HIF1α in specimens from left ventricular epicardium, myocardium and endocardium and right ventricle after 90 min of cardioplegia followed by 60 min of recovery; (B) Staining and quantification of HSP60 (heat shock protein 60). Bar graphs depict the percentage of cells positively stained for HSP60 in specimens from left ventricular epicardium, myocardium and endocardium and right ventricle after 90 min of cardioplegia followed by 60 min of recovery. All data are given as means ± SEM. Significant differences (p < 0.05) versus control is indicated by #, significant differences versus control + EGCG by § and significant differences versus cardioplegia by *. Arrows indicate positively stained cells.
Figure 4(A) Staining and quantification of NT (nitrotyrosine)-positive cells. Bar graphs depict the percentage of cells positively stained for NT in specimens from left ventricular epicardium, myocardium and endocardium and right ventricle after 90 min of cardioplegia followed by 60 min of recovery; (B) Staining and quantification of PAR (poly-ADP-ribose). Bar graphs depict the percentage of nuclei positively stained for PAR in specimens from left ventricular epicardium, myocardium and endocardium and right ventricle after 90 min of cardioplegia followed by 60 min of recovery. All data are given as means ± SEM. Significant differences (p < 0.05) versus control is indicated by #, significant differences versus control + EGCG by § and significant differences versus cardioplegia by *. Arrows indicate positively stained cells.
Figure 5(A) Staining and quantification of AIF (apoptosis-inducing factor)-positive cells. Bar graphs depict the percentage of cells positively stained for AIF in specimens from left ventricular epicardium, myocardium and endocardium and right ventricle after 90 min of cardioplegia followed by 60 min of recovery; (B) Staining and quantification of cC3 (cleaved caspase 3). Bar graphs depict the percentage of nuclei positively stained for cC3 in specimens from left ventricular epicardium, myocardium and endocardium and right ventricle after 90 min of cardioplegia followed by 60 min of recovery. All data are given as means ± SEM. Significant differences (p < 0.05) versus control is indicated by #, significant differences versus control + EGCG by § and significant differences versus cardioplegia by *. Arrows indicate positively stained cells.