| Literature DB >> 31889812 |
Aida Salameh1, Stefan Dhein2, Marie Mewes1, Sophie Sigusch1, Philipp Kiefer3, Marcel Vollroth3, Johannes Seeger4, Ingo Dähnert1.
Abstract
Severe inborn cardiac malformations are typically corrected in cardioplegia, with a cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) taking over body circulation. During the operation the arrested hearts are subjected to a global ischemia/reperfusion injury. Although the applied cardioplegic solutions have a certain protective effect, application of additional substances to reduce cardiac damage are of interest.18 domestic piglets (10-15 kg) were subjected to a 90 min CPB and a 120 min reperfusion phase without or with the application of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (10 mg/kg body weight) or minocycline (4 mg/kg body weight), with both drugs given before and after CPB. 18 additional sham-operated piglets without or with epigallocatechin-3-gallate or minocycline served as controls. In total 36 piglets were analyzed (3 CPB-groups and 3 control groups without or with epigallocatechin-3-gallate or minocycline respectively; 6 piglets per group). Hemodynamic and blood parameters and ATP-measurements were assessed. Moreover, a histological evaluation of the heart muscle was performed.Entities:
Keywords: ACT, activated clotting time; AEC, 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole; AIF, apoptosis-inducing factor; CO, cardiac output; CPB, cardio-pulmonary bypass; Cardio-pulmonary bypass; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; EF, ejection fraction; EGCG, epigallo-3-catechin-gallate; EGCG, ischemia/reperfusion injury; HIF1α, hypoxia-inducible factor α; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; Heart; MPTP, mitochondrial permeability transition pore; Minocycline; NT, nitrotyrosine; PAR, poly-ADP-ribose; PARP, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor α; cC3, cleaved caspase-3
Year: 2019 PMID: 31889812 PMCID: PMC6933174 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.04.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Blood parameters and hemodynamic data at baseline conditions and after reperfusion. Catecholamine consumption during the entire experiment and tissue ATP-content at the end of reperfusion.
| Parameters | Control | Control + EGCG | Control + Minocycline | CPB | CPB + EGCG | CPB + Minocycline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creatine kinase (µmol/(L * s) | ||||||
| Baseline | 18 ± 2.9 | 15 ± 2.7 | 16 ± 2.3 | 18 ± 3.2 | 19 ± 3.2 | 20 ± 3.3 |
| Reperfusion | 25 ± 2.4 | 17 ± 2.5 | 24 ± 5.2 | 58 ± 6.3 | 35 ± 6.9& | 45 ± 7.2§ |
| Lactate (mmol/L) | ||||||
| Baseline | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.2 |
| Reperfusion | 2.3 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 7.3 ± 1.1 | 6.0 ± 1.1+ | 4.9 ± 0.9§ |
| Ejection fraction (%) | ||||||
| Baseline | 64 ± 2.1 | 63 ± 2.8 | 63 ± 1.8 | 62 ± 1.4 | 69 ± 6.2 | 63 ± 2.3 |
| Reperfusion | 64 ± 2.6 | 60 ± 2.5 | 67 ± 4.6 | 61 ± 6.5 | 64 ± 3.3 | 58 ± 2.5 |
| Cardiac output (ml/min) | ||||||
| Baseline | 2359 ± 174 | 2100 ± 108 | 2137 ± 88 | 1949 ± 112 | 2529 ± 238 | 2084 ± 98 |
| Reperfusion | 2199 ± 195 | 2031 ± 124 | 2334 ± 206 | 2245 ± 262 | 2555 ± 382 | 2074 ± 221 |
| Mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg) | ||||||
| Baseline | 66 ± 3.7 | 64 ± 3.8 | 65 ± 2.4 | 70 ± 4.7 | 60 ± 6.4 | 69 ± 3.7 |
| Reperfusion | 70 ± 2.6 | 65 ± 2.5 | 69 ± 4.1 | 71 ± 3.4 | 72 ± 3.7 | 68 ± 4.2 |
| Total catecholamine requirement (µg) | 31 ± 9.1 | 14 ± 8.8 | 32 ± 10.3 | 202 ± 60 | 173 ± 54.6+ | 184 ± 45.8§ |
| Tissue ATP content (µg/mg tissue) | 4.1 ± 0.8 | 5.5 ± 1.3 | 4.8 ± 0.6 | 1.5 ± 0.9 | 1.8 ± 0.2+ | 1.2 ± 0.7§ |
significance (p < 0.05) versus control, & significance (p < 0.05) versus CPB, + significance (p < 0.05) versus control + EGCG, § significance (p < 0.05) versus control + Minocycline.
Fig. 1Staining and quantification of HIF1α (hypoxia-inducable factor 1α) translocation. (A) upper panel: Bar graphs depict the percentage of nuclei positively stained for HIF1α in specimens from left ventricular free wall. (B) lower panel: Original images showing HIF1α staining of the left ventricle. Arrows indicate positively stained red nuclei. Scale bar = 20 µm. All data are given as means ± SEM. Significant differences (p < 0.05) versus control are indicated by *, significant differences versus CPB by a & and significant differences versus control + minocycline by a §.
Fig. 2Staining and quantification of AIF (apoptosis-inducing factor) translocation. (A) upper panel: Bar graphs depict the percentage of nuclei positively stained for AIF in specimens from left ventricular free wall. (B) lower panel: Original images showing AIF staining of the left ventricle. Arrows indicate positively stained red nuclei. Scale bar = 20 µm. All data are given as means ± SEM. Significant differences (p < 0.05) versus control are indicated by *, significant differences versus CPB by a &.
Fig. 3Staining and quantification of cC3 (cleaved-caspase 3) translocation. (A) upper panel: Bar graphs depict the percentage of nuclei positively stained for cC3 in specimens from left ventricular free wall. (B) lower panel: Original images showing cC3 staining of the left ventricle. Arrows indicate positively stained red nuclei. Scale bar = 20 µm. All data are given as means ± SEM. Significant differences (p < 0.05) versus control are indicated by *, significant differences versus control + EGCG by a +, significant differences versus control + minocycline by a §, significant differences versus CPB by a &.
Fig. 4Staining and quantification of NT (nitrotyrosine) positive cells. (A) upper panel: Bar graphs depict the percentage of cells positively stained for NT in specimens from left ventricular free wall. (B) lower panel: Original images showing NT staining of the left ventricle. Arrows indicate positively stained red cells. Scale bar = 20 µm. All data are given as means ± SEM. Significant differences (p < 0.05) versus control are indicated by *, significant differences versus CPB by a &.
Fig. 5Staining and quantification of PAR (pol-ADP-ribose) positive cells. (A) upper panel: Bar graphs depict the percentage of cells positively stained for PAR in specimens from left ventricular free wall. (B) lower panel: Original images showing PAR staining of the left ventricle. Arrows indicate positively stained red cells. Scale bar = 20 µm. All data are given as means ± SEM. Significant differences (p < 0.05) versus control are indicated by *, significant differences versus control + EGCG by a +, significant differences versus control-minocycline by a §, significant differences versus CPB by a &.
Fig. 6Staining and quantification of TNFα (tumor necrosis factorα) positive cells. (A) upper panel: Bar graphs depict the percentage of cells positively stained for TNFα in specimens from left ventricular free wall. (B) lower panel: Original images showing TNFα staining of the left ventricle. Arrows indicate positively stained red cells. Scale bar = 20 µm. All data are given as means ± SEM. Significant differences (p < 0.05) versus control are indicated by *, significant differences versus control-minocycline by a §, significant differences versus CPB by a &.