| Literature DB >> 29473644 |
Jared W Magnani1,2, Courtney L Schlusser1, Everlyne Kimani3, Bruce L Rollman2, Michael K Paasche-Orlow4, Timothy W Bickmore3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a highly prevalent heart rhythm condition that has significant associated morbidity and requires chronic treatment. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies have the potential to enhance multiple aspects of AF care, including education, monitoring of symptoms, and encouraging and tracking medication adherence. We have previously implemented and tested relational agents to improve outcomes in chronic disease and sought to develop a smartphone-based relational agent for improving patient-centered outcomes in AF.Entities:
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; health-related quality of life; mHealth; medication adherence
Year: 2017 PMID: 29473644 PMCID: PMC5818980 DOI: 10.2196/cardio.8543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Cardio ISSN: 2561-1011
Figure 1Screenshots of the relational agent: (a) symptoms menu and (b) an emphatic gesture.
Summary of relational agent domain content.
| Domain | Module content |
| Education | Causes of AFa |
| AF treatment strategies | |
| Stroke prevention in AF | |
| AliveCor Kardia use, troubleshooting | |
| Symptoms | Overview of common symptoms |
| Chest pain and chest pressure | |
| Heart racing or palpitations | |
| Dyspnea and shortness of breath | |
| Fatigue | |
| Adherence | Overview of adherence |
| Adherence to medications | |
| Adherence barriers | |
| Strategies to address barriers | |
| Patient activation | Goals for self-management |
| Preparing for the medical encounter |
aAF: atrial fibrillation.
Descriptive characteristics of the pilot cohort (N=31).
| Characteristics | Cohort (N=31) | |
| Age in years, mean (SD) | 68 (11) | |
| Women, n (%) | 12 (39) | |
| White race, n (%) | 29 (94) | |
| Education, <College, n (%) | 21 (68) | |
| Annual income, <US $35,000, n (%) | 12 (39) | |
| S-TOFHLAa≤23, n (%) | 7 (23) | |
| BMIb, kg/m, mean (SD) | 30.8 (8.8) | |
| Current smoker, n (%) | 5 (16) | |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 21 (68) | |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 4 (13) | |
| Prevalent CVDc, n (%) | 4 (13) | |
| Prevalent heart failure, n (%) | 7 (23) | |
| Prior stroke or TIAd, n (%) | 5 (16) | |
aS-TOFHLA: Short-Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults.
bBMI: body mass index.
cCVD: cardiovascular disease.
dTIA: transient ischemic attack.
Selected assessments of the pilot cohort at baseline and 30 days.
| Assessments | Baseline | 30 days | ||
| AFEQTa, global score | 64.5 (22.9) | 76.3 (19.4) | <.01 | |
| Symptoms | 74.6 (24.1) | 80.7 (21.4) | .07 | |
| Daily activities | 56.0 (27.8) | 65.2 (26.1) | .01 | |
| Treatment concerns | 66.7 (26.2) | 74.6 (22.6) | .08 | |
| Treatment satisfaction | 71.2 (25.4) | 72.9 (27.6) | .71 | |
| MMASb | 7.3 (0.9) | 7.7 (0.5) | .01 | |
| PAMc | 3.0 (0.8) | 3.4 (0.7) | .33 | |
aAFEQT: Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of life.
bMMAS: Morisky 8-item Medication Adherence Scale.
cPAM: Patient Activation Measure.
Relational agent acceptability assessment using a Likert-score ranging from 1 to 7.
| Item | Description of range | Median (range) |
| How satisfied were you with Tanya? | 1=Not at all; 7=Very satisfied | 5 (1-7) |
| How easy was talking to Tanya? | 1=Easy; 7=Difficult | 1 (1-7) |
| How much would you like to continue working with Tanya? | 1=Not at all; 7=Very much | 5 (1-7) |
| How much do you like Tanya? | 1=Not at all; 7=Very much | 5 (1-7) |
| How would you characterize your relationship with Tanya? | 1=Complete stranger; 7=Close friend | 4 (1-7) |
| How much do you trust Tanya? | 1=Not at all; 7=Very much | 5 (3-7) |
| How much do you feel that Tanya cares about you? | 1=Not at all; 7=Very much | 5 (3-7) |
| How much do you feel that you and Tanya understand each other? | 1=Not at all; 7=Very much | 5 (1-7) |
| I feel uncomfortable with Tanya. | 1=Disagree completely; 7=Agree completely | 1 (1-5) |
| Tanya and I understand each other. | 1=Disagree completely; 7=Agree completely | 4 (1-7) |
| I believe Tanya likes me. | 1=Disagree completely; 7=Agree completely | 4 (1-7) |
| I believe Tanya is genuinely concerned about my welfare. | 1=Disagree completely; 7=Agree completely | 5 (1-7) |
| Tanya and I respect each other. | 1=Disagree completely; 7=Agree completely | 5 (1-7) |
| I feel that Tanya is not totally honest about her feelings toward me. | 1=Disagree completely; 7=Agree completely | 1 (1-5) |
| I am confident in Tanya’s ability to help me. | 1=Disagree completely; 7=Agree completely | 5 (3-7) |
| I feel that Tanya appreciates me. | 1=Disagree completely; 7=Agree completely | 4 (1-7) |
| Tanya and I trust one another. | 1=Disagree completely; 7=Agree completely | 4 (1-7) |
| My relationship with Tanya is very important to me. | 1=Disagree completely; 7=Agree completely | 4 (1-7) |
| I have the feeling that if I say or do the wrong things, Tanya will stop working with me. | 1=Disagree completely; 7=Agree completely | 4 (1-7) |
| I feel Tanya cares about me even when I do things she does not approve of. | 1=Disagree completely; 7=Agree completely | 1 (1-4) |