Literature DB >> 29466941

Transcription start site profiling uncovers divergent transcription and enhancer-associated RNAs in Drosophila melanogaster.

Michael P Meers1,2,3, Karen Adelman4, Robert J Duronio1,2,3, Brian D Strahl1,5, Daniel J McKay1,2,3, A Gregory Matera6,7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-resolution transcription start site (TSS) mapping in D. melanogaster embryos and cell lines has revealed a rich and detailed landscape of both cis- and trans-regulatory elements and factors. However, TSS profiling has not been investigated in an orthogonal in vivo setting. Here, we present a comprehensive dataset that links TSS dynamics with nucleosome occupancy and gene expression in the wandering third instar larva, a developmental stage characterized by large-scale shifts in transcriptional programs in preparation for metamorphosis.
RESULTS: The data recapitulate major regulatory classes of TSSs, based on peak width, promoter-proximal polymerase pausing, and cis-regulatory element density. We confirm the paucity of divergent transcription units in D. melanogaster, but also identify notable exceptions. Furthermore, we identify thousands of novel initiation events occurring at unannotated TSSs that can be classified into functional categories by their local density of histone modifications. Interestingly, a sub-class of these unannotated TSSs overlaps with functionally validated enhancer elements, consistent with a regulatory role for "enhancer RNAs" (eRNAs) in defining developmental transcription programs.
CONCLUSIONS: High-depth TSS mapping is a powerful strategy for identifying and characterizing low-abundance and/or low-stability RNAs. Global analysis of transcription initiation patterns in a developing organism reveals a vast number of novel initiation events that identify potential eRNAs as well as other non-coding transcripts critical for animal development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioinformatics; Transcription initiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29466941      PMCID: PMC5822475          DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4510-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


  63 in total

1.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Histone H3 methylation by Set2 directs deacetylation of coding regions by Rpd3S to suppress spurious intragenic transcription.

Authors:  Michael J Carrozza; Bing Li; Laurence Florens; Tamaki Suganuma; Selene K Swanson; Kenneth K Lee; Wei-Jong Shia; Scott Anderson; John Yates; Michael P Washburn; Jerry L Workman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Cotranscriptional set2 methylation of histone H3 lysine 36 recruits a repressive Rpd3 complex.

Authors:  Michael-Christopher Keogh; Siavash K Kurdistani; Stephanie A Morris; Seong Hoon Ahn; Vladimir Podolny; Sean R Collins; Maya Schuldiner; Kayu Chin; Thanuja Punna; Natalie J Thompson; Charles Boone; Andrew Emili; Jonathan S Weissman; Timothy R Hughes; Brian D Strahl; Michael Grunstein; Jack F Greenblatt; Stephen Buratowski; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Analysis of nascent RNA identifies a unified architecture of initiation regions at mammalian promoters and enhancers.

Authors:  Leighton J Core; André L Martins; Charles G Danko; Colin T Waters; Adam Siepel; John T Lis
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Defining the status of RNA polymerase at promoters.

Authors:  Leighton J Core; Joshua J Waterfall; Daniel A Gilchrist; David C Fargo; Hojoong Kwak; Karen Adelman; John T Lis
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  A survey of 6,300 genomic fragments for cis-regulatory activity in the imaginal discs of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Aurélie Jory; Carlos Estella; Matt W Giorgianni; Matthew Slattery; Todd R Laverty; Gerald M Rubin; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Promoter elements associated with RNA Pol II stalling in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  David A Hendrix; Joung-Woo Hong; Julia Zeitlinger; Daniel S Rokhsar; Michael S Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Mll3 and Mll4 Facilitate Enhancer RNA Synthesis and Transcription from Promoters Independently of H3K4 Monomethylation.

Authors:  Kristel M Dorighi; Tomek Swigut; Telmo Henriques; Natarajan V Bhanu; Benjamin S Scruggs; Nataliya Nady; Christopher D Still; Benjamin A Garcia; Karen Adelman; Joanna Wysocka
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data.

Authors:  Fidel Ramírez; Friederike Dündar; Sarah Diehl; Björn A Grüning; Thomas Manke
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Survey of cryptic unstable transcripts in yeast.

Authors:  Jessica M Vera; Robin D Dowell
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  14 in total

1.  Overlapping but Distinct Sequences Play Roles in the Insulator and Promoter Activities of the Drosophila BEAF-Dependent scs' Insulator.

Authors:  Mukesh Maharjan; J Keller McKowen; Craig M Hart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Transcriptional enhancers at 40: evolution of a viral DNA element to nuclear architectural structures.

Authors:  Sreejith J Nair; Tom Suter; Susan Wang; Lu Yang; Feng Yang; Michael G Rosenfeld
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 11.821

3.  Distinct developmental phenotypes result from mutation of Set8/KMT5A and histone H4 lysine 20 in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Aaron T Crain; Stephen Klusza; Robin L Armstrong; Priscila Santa Rosa; Brenda R S Temple; Brian D Strahl; Daniel J McKay; A Gregory Matera; Robert J Duronio
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 4.  Enhancer RNAs are an important regulatory layer of the epigenome.

Authors:  Vittorio Sartorelli; Shannon M Lauberth
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 15.369

5.  Characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana Promoter Bidirectionality and Antisense RNAs by Inactivation of Nuclear RNA Decay Pathways.

Authors:  Axel Thieffry; Maria Louisa Vigh; Jette Bornholdt; Maxim Ivanov; Peter Brodersen; Albin Sandelin
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Long-read RNA sequencing reveals widespread sex-specific alternative splicing in threespine stickleback fish.

Authors:  Alice S Naftaly; Shana Pau; Michael A White
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Transcription start site analysis reveals widespread divergent transcription in D. melanogaster and core promoter-encoded enhancer activities.

Authors:  Sarah Rennie; Maria Dalby; Marta Lloret-Llinares; Stylianos Bakoulis; Christian Dalager Vaagensø; Torben Heick Jensen; Robin Andersson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Genome-wide RNA pol II initiation and pausing in neural progenitors of the rat.

Authors:  Adam Scheidegger; Carissa J Dunn; Ann Samarakkody; Nii Koney-Kwaku Koney; Danielle Perley; Ramendra N Saha; Sergei Nechaev
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 9.  Spirits in the Material World: Enhancer RNAs in Transcriptional Regulation.

Authors:  Tim Y Hou; W Lee Kraus
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 10.  Transcribe this way: Rap1 confers promoter directionality by repressing divergent transcription.

Authors:  Andrew C K Wu; Folkert J Van Werven
Journal:  Transcription       Date:  2019-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.