| Literature DB >> 29466846 |
Hye Jeong Kim1, Mi Kyung Kwak1, In Ho Choi2, So-Young Jin2, Hyeong Kyu Park1, Dong Won Byun1, Kyoil Suh1, Myung Hi Yoo1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to address the role of the elasticity index as a possible predictive marker for detecting papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and quantitatively assess shear wave elastography (SWE) as a tool for differentiating PTC from benign thyroid nodules.Entities:
Keywords: Elasticity imaging techniques; Shear wave; Thyroid cancer, papillary; Thyroid nodule
Year: 2018 PMID: 29466846 PMCID: PMC6610177 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2016.326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Intern Med ISSN: 1226-3303 Impact factor: 2.884
Figure 1.Fingdings on surgical histology. The classical histologicappearance of papillary thyroid cancer with papillarystructure consisting of one or two layers of tumor cellssurrounding a well defined fibrovascular core and cysticchanges (H&E, ×40).
Figure 2.Shear wave elastography (upper image) and grayscale ultrasound (lower image) of a papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Comparison of baseline characteristics between benign nodule and PTC (n = 105)
| Characteristic | Benign nodule (n = 91) | PTC (n = 14) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female sex | 68 (75) | 10 (71) | 0.752[ |
| Age, yr | 55 (44–65) | 51 (49–55) | 0.177[ |
| Hypoechogenicity | 34 (37) | 12 (86) | 0.001[ |
| Non-parallel orientation | 5 (5) | 6 (43) | 0.001[ |
| Irregular margin | 15 (17) | 10 (71) | < 0.001[ |
| Microcalcification | 4 (4) | 4 (29) | 0.038[ |
| Tumor size, cm | 1.31 (0.91–1.87) | 0.76 (0.70–1.10) | 0.001[ |
| Elasticity indices, kPa | |||
| EMean | 23.7 (16.9–31.5) | 37.4 (24.1–84.7) | 0.005[ |
| EMin | 17.8 (13.4–26.4) | 27.9 (15.9–55.1 | 0.034[ |
| EMax | 31.5 (23.0–36.3) | 46.7 (35.0–119.7) | < 0.001[ |
| ESD | 2.6 (1.8–4.1) | 6.3 (4.1–17.3) | < 0.001[ |
| TSH at baseline, mU/L | 1.4 (0.8–2.4) | 1.8 (1.7–2.8) | 0.241[ |
Values are presented as number (%) or median (interquartile range).
PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; EMean, mean elasticity; EMin, minimum elasticity; EMax, maximum elasticity; ESD, one standard deviation of elastographic values; TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone.
Chi-square test.
Mann-Whitney U test.
Figure 3.Scatter dot plots of shear wave elastography measurements for benign nodules (n = 91) and papillary thyroid carcinomas(PTC, n = 14). (A) Mean elasticity (EMean). (B) Minimum elasticity (EMin). (C) Maximum elasticity (EMax). (D) One standarddeviation of elastographic values (ESD). Cental bars denote median.
Receiver operating characteristic results and diagnostic performance of elasticity indices for predicting papillary thyroid carcinoma
| Elasticity indices | Cut-off, kPa | AUC (95% CI) | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % | PPV | NPV | Accuracy, % | PLR | NLR | Diagnostic odds ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMean | 33.3 | 0.743 (0.582–0.904) | 57.1 | 86.4 | 50.0 | 89.5 | 80.8 | 4.21 | 0.50 | 8.50 (2.33–31.02) |
| EMin | 29.7 | 0.683 (0.508–0.858) | 50.0 | 86.4 | 46.7 | 87.9 | 79.5 | 3.69 | 0.57 | 6.74 (1.76–23.06) |
| EMax | 45.9 | 0.803 (0.664–0.942) | 57.1 | 88.1 | 53.3 | 89.7 | 82.2 | 4.82 | 0.49 | 9.91 (2.65–37.09) |
| ESD | 6.5 | 0.849 (0.723–0.975) | 50.0 | 96.6 | 77.8 | 89.1 | 87.7 | 14.75 | 0.52 | 28.50 (4.92–165.09) |
AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio; EMean, mean elasticity index; EMin, minimum elasticity index; EMax, maximum elasticity index; ESD, standard deviation of elastographic values.
Discrimination of papillary thyroid carcinoma from benign nodules using different cut-offs
| Elasticity indices | Cut-off, kPa | Sensitivity, % (95% CI) | Specificity, % (95% CI) | PLR | NLR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESD | 1.4 | 100.0 (78.5–100.0) | 18.6 (10.7–30.4) | 1.23 | 0.00 |
| 2.7 | 92.9 (68.5–98.7) | 52.5 (40.0–64.7) | 1.96 | 0.14 | |
| 5.0 | 71.4 (45.4–88.3) | 88.1 (77.5–94.1) | 6.02 | 0.32 | |
| 6.5[ | 50.0 (26.8–73.2) | 96.6 (88.5–99.1) | 14.75 | 0.52 | |
| 10.8 | 35.7 (16.3–61.2) | 100.0 (93.9–100.0) | - | 0.64 |
CI, confidence interval; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio; ESD, standard deviation of elastographic values.
Threshold with highest accuracy.