OBJECTIVE: To evaluate real-time shear wave ultrasound elastography (SWE) for characterizing focal thyroid lesions in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Seventy-four patients with 81 focal thyroid lesions undergoing conventional US with needle cytology also underwent SWE. Absolute and relative SWE stiffness measurements on colour-coded elastograms were correlated with cytology and their discriminatory performances assessed. RESULTS: Seventeen nodules were malignant (13 papillary, 4 other cancers), 45 benign (43 hyperplastic nodules, 2 focal thyroiditis), 5 indeterminate ("follicular lesions"), and 5 had inadequate cytology. SWE results were higher in malignant than benign nodules (P values 0.02-0.05) although their discriminatory performances were mediocre (AUCs 0.58-0.74). The most accurate SWE cut-off, 34.5 kPa for a 2-mm region of interest, achieved 76.9 % sensitivity and 71.1 % specificity for discriminating papillary cancer from benign nodules. No thresholds produced high sensitivity without lowering specificity appreciably, and vice versa. Nodule size correlated with SWE for benign nodules (P < 0.01). Intranodular cystic change or calcification did not influence SWE. Qualitatively, elastographic artefacts and foci lacking colour elasticity signal occurred in some solid nodules. CONCLUSION: Although malignant nodules are generally stiffer than benign nodules, the precision results do not suggest a definitive role for SWE, at present, in identifying or excluding thyroid malignancy. KEY POINTS : • Shear wave ultrasound elastography (SWE) offers new insight into thyroid disease. • Papillary cancers have higher SWE indices (equating to higher stiffness) than benign nodules. • SWE appears limited in terms of identifying or excluding thyroid malignancy accurately. • Vertically aligned elastographic artefacts can occur in thyroid SWE. • Areas lacking SWE colour signal can occur in some solid thyroid nodules.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate real-time shear wave ultrasound elastography (SWE) for characterizing focal thyroid lesions in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Seventy-four patients with 81 focal thyroid lesions undergoing conventional US with needle cytology also underwent SWE. Absolute and relative SWE stiffness measurements on colour-coded elastograms were correlated with cytology and their discriminatory performances assessed. RESULTS: Seventeen nodules were malignant (13 papillary, 4 other cancers), 45 benign (43 hyperplastic nodules, 2 focal thyroiditis), 5 indeterminate ("follicular lesions"), and 5 had inadequate cytology. SWE results were higher in malignant than benign nodules (P values 0.02-0.05) although their discriminatory performances were mediocre (AUCs 0.58-0.74). The most accurate SWE cut-off, 34.5 kPa for a 2-mm region of interest, achieved 76.9 % sensitivity and 71.1 % specificity for discriminating papillary cancer from benign nodules. No thresholds produced high sensitivity without lowering specificity appreciably, and vice versa. Nodule size correlated with SWE for benign nodules (P < 0.01). Intranodular cystic change or calcification did not influence SWE. Qualitatively, elastographic artefacts and foci lacking colour elasticity signal occurred in some solid nodules. CONCLUSION: Although malignant nodules are generally stiffer than benign nodules, the precision results do not suggest a definitive role for SWE, at present, in identifying or excluding thyroid malignancy. KEY POINTS : • Shear wave ultrasound elastography (SWE) offers new insight into thyroid disease. • Papillary cancers have higher SWE indices (equating to higher stiffness) than benign nodules. • SWE appears limited in terms of identifying or excluding thyroid malignancy accurately. • Vertically aligned elastographic artefacts can occur in thyroid SWE. • Areas lacking SWE colour signal can occur in some solid thyroid nodules.
Authors: Kunwar S S Bhatia; Carmen C M Cho; Cina S L Tong; Edmund H Y Yuen; Anil T Ahuja Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: M Friedrich-Rust; A Sperber; K Holzer; J Diener; F Grünwald; K Badenhoop; S Weber; S Kriener; E Herrmann; W O Bechstein; S Zeuzem; J Bojunga Journal: Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes Date: 2009-10-23 Impact factor: 2.949
Authors: Hee Jung Moon; Ji Min Sung; Eun-Kyung Kim; Jung Hyun Yoon; Ji Hyun Youk; Jin Young Kwak Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: A Lyshchik; T Higashi; R Asato; S Tanaka; J Ito; M Hiraoka; A B Brill; T Saga; K Togashi Journal: Ultrason Imaging Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 1.578
Authors: Mickael Tanter; Jeremy Bercoff; Alexandra Athanasiou; Thomas Deffieux; Jean-Luc Gennisson; Gabriel Montaldo; Marie Muller; Anne Tardivon; Mathias Fink Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2008-04-08 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Andrew Evans; Patsy Whelehan; Kim Thomson; Denis McLean; Katrin Brauer; Colin Purdie; Lee Jordan; Lee Baker; Alastair Thompson Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 6.466