Literature DB >> 25264337

Shear wave elastography for localization of prostate cancer lesions and assessment of elasticity thresholds: implications for targeted biopsies and active surveillance protocols.

Katharina Boehm1, Georg Salomon2, Burkhard Beyer2, Jonas Schiffmann2, Kathrin Simonis3, Markus Graefen2, Lars Budaeus2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Shear wave elastography allows the detection of cancer by using focused ultrasound pulses for locally deforming tissue. The differences in tissue elasticity and stiffness have been used increasingly in breast cancer imaging and help detect potential tumor lesions in the prostate. In this study we localized prostate cancer lesions using shear wave elastography before radical prostatectomy and assessed the examiner independent elasticity threshold for cancer foci detection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Shear wave elastography scanning of the whole prostate was performed before radical prostatectomy in 60 consecutive patients with high, intermediate and low risk disease. Localization of suspected lesions and density threshold (kPa) were recorded in up to 12 areas and resulted in 703 different fields. Shear wave elastography findings were correlated with final pathology. Initially 381 areas were used to establish shear wave elastography cutoffs (development cohort 32 patients). Subsequently these cutoffs were validated in 322 areas (validation cohort 28 patients).
RESULTS: Using shear wave elastography significant differences were recorded for the elasticity of benign tissue vs prostate cancer nodules at 42 kPa (range 29 to 71.3) vs 88 kPa (range 54 to 132) (all p <0.001). Median cancer lesion diameter was 26 mm (range 18 to 41). Applying the most informative cutoff of 50 kPa to the validation cohort resulted in 80.9% and 69.1% sensitivity and specificity, respectively, and 74.2% accuracy for detecting cancer nodules based on final pathological finding. The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 67.1% and 82.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Shear wave elastography allows the identification of cancer foci based on shear wave elastography differences. Moreover, reliable cutoffs for this approach can be established, allowing examiner independent localization of prostate cancer foci.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  early detection of cancer; elasticity imaging techniques; magnetic resonance imaging; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25264337     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  23 in total

1.  Elevated hardness of peripheral gland on real-time elastography is an independent marker for high-risk prostate cancers.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Jing Yao; Yehua Cai; Limin Zhang; Yishuo Wu; Jingyu Xiong; Jun Shi; Yuanyuan Wang; Yi Wang
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Controversial evidence for the use of HistoScanning™ in the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jonas Schiffmann; Lukas Manka; Katharina Boehm; Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Markus Graefen; Peter Hammerer; Georg Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Stiffness of benign and malignant prostate tissue measured by shear-wave elastography: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Christelle Melodelima; Au Hoang Dinh; Flavie Bratan; Gaele Pagnoux; Thomas Sanzalone; Sébastien Crouzet; Marc Colombel; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Rémi Souchon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Advanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Correas; Ethan J Halpern; Richard G Barr; Sangeet Ghai; Jochen Walz; Sylvain Bodard; Charles Dariane; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  The role of diagnostic ultrasound imaging for patients with known prostate cancer within an active surveillance pathway: A systematic review.

Authors:  Pamela Parker; Maureen Twiddy; Paul Whybrow; Alan Rigby; Matthew Simms
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 6.  Application of Multiple Ultrasonic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yushan Liu; Shi Zeng; Ran Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 7.  Principles of ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Arinc Ozturk; Joseph R Grajo; Manish Dhyani; Brian W Anthony; Anthony E Samir
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-04

Review 8.  A Review of Imaging Methods for Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Saradwata Sarkar; Sudipta Das
Journal:  Biomed Eng Comput Biol       Date:  2016-03-02

9.  Quantitative transrectal shear wave elastography undergoing salvage extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy following failed radiotherapy.

Authors:  Cheng Wei; Magdalena Szewczyk-Bieda; Paddy Nibblok; E Brown; Stephen Lang; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  The challenge of prostate biopsy guidance in the era of mpMRI detected lesion: ultrasound-guided versus in-bore biopsy.

Authors:  Auke Jager; Joan C Vilanova; Massimo Michi; Hessel Wijkstra; Jorg R Oddens
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.