| Literature DB >> 29463028 |
Gabriele Rocchetti1, Marco Pellizzoni2, Domenico Montesano3, Luigi Lucini4.
Abstract
Natural by-products, especially phenolic compounds, are in great demand by the nutra-pharmaceutical and biomedical industries. An analytical study was performed to investigate, for the first time, the presence of antioxidant constituents and the corresponding in vitro antioxidant activity in the extract of cladodes from Ficodindia di San Cono (Opuntia ficus-indica) protected designation of origin (PDO). The cladode extracts were analysed for target determination of selected constituents, i.e. β-polysaccharides and total phenolic content. Moreover, the antioxidant activity of hydro-alcoholic extracts was assessed by means of two different methods: α, α-diphenyl-β-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging method and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay. An untargeted UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS profiling approach was used to depict the phenolic profile of hydro-alcoholic cladode extracts. Interestingly, over 2 g/kg of polyphenols were detected in this matrix, and these compounds were mainly responsible for the antioxidant properties, as shown by the strong correlation between phenolic classes and antioxidant scores. Finally, this study provides basic information on the presence of bioactive compounds and in vitro antioxidant activities in cladode extracts from cactus that might recommend their novel applications at the industrial level in the field of nutraceutical products.Entities:
Keywords: Opuntia ficus-indica; antioxidant activity; cladodes; food profiling; polyphenols; β-polysaccharides
Year: 2018 PMID: 29463028 PMCID: PMC5848128 DOI: 10.3390/foods7020024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Chemical composition (on a fresh weight basis) of Ficodindia di San Cono cladodes. Data are presented as mean values ± standard deviation (n = 5). NDF = neutral detergent fiber; ADF = acid detergent fiber; ADL = acid detergent lignin. * = obtained by difference.
| Parameters | San Cono cladodes |
|---|---|
| Moisture (g water/100 g cladodes) | 92.33 ± 1.36 |
| Protein (%) | 0.58 ± 0.02 |
| Ash (%) | 0.50 ± 0.01 |
| Lipid (%) | 0.12 ± 0.02 |
| Carbohydrates (%) * | 3.05 |
| NDF (%) | 3.42 ± 0.63 |
| ADF (%) | 0.83 ± 0.14 |
| ADL (%) | 0.12 ± 0.02 |
Total β-polysaccharides, total phenolic content (TPC), and antioxidant activities (DPPH radical scavenging and FRAP reducing power) in cladodes extracts. The data are presented as mean values ± standard deviation (n = 5). Results for TPC, DPPH and FRAP are expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAE), whilst results for β-polysaccharides are expressed as β-glucan equivalents. FW = fresh weight.
| 2617.39 ± 225.58 | 2633.10 ± 214.78 | 1040.03 ± 112.42 | 1638.17 ± 41.30 |
Figure 1Abundance of different chemical classes of polyphenols in Ficodindia di San Cono PDO cladodes analysed (cumulative intensities as gained from UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS profiling).
Quantifications per classes of phenolics identified from untargeted UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS in Ficodindia di San Cono PDO cladodes. Results are expressed in mg/kg of phenolic equivalents. The data are presented as mean values ± standard deviation (n = 3). Glu = glucoside.
| Phenolic Class | Phenolic Derivatives | mg/kg Equivalents |
|---|---|---|
|
| Cyanidin-Glu | 1058.55 ± 10.49 |
| Pelargonidin-Glu | 187.97 ± 10.42 | |
| Petunidin-Glu | 186.55 ± 3.11 | |
| Delphinidin-Glu | 2.81 ± 0.31 | |
| Malvidin-Glu | 4.31 ± 0.08 | |
| Luteolin-Glu | 5.14 ± 1.59 | |
| Apigenin-Glu | 40.69 ± 0.58 | |
| Isoflavonoids | 6.81 ± 0.52 | |
| Myricetin-Glu | 8.52 ± 0.55 | |
| Quercetin-Glu | 8.97 ± 0.69 | |
| Kaempferol-Glu | 241.68 ± 3.39 | |
| Isorhamnetin-Glu | 98.42 ± 8.52 | |
| Furofurans | 6.52 ± 2.24 | |
| Dibenzylbutyrolactone | 3.47 ± 0.02 | |
| Alkylphenols | 65.04 ± 10.43 | |
| Hydroxybenzaldehydes | 0.43 ± 0.06 | |
| Hydroxycoumarins | 7.81 ± 0.52 | |
| Tyrosols | 12.89 ± 1.02 | |
| Hydroxybenzoics | 114.01 ± 3.34 | |
| Hydroxyphenylpropanoics | 91.58 ± 5.98 | |
| Hydroxycinnamics | 1248.24 ± 103.15 |
Pearson’s correlations coefficients between total phenolic content (TPC), DPPH radical scavenging, FRAP reducing power and phenolic subclasses equivalents. ** = p < 0.01; * = p < 0.05; n.s. = not significant.
| DPPH | FRAP | TPC | Cyanidin Eq. | Luteolin Eq. | Catechin Eq. | Ferulate Eq. | Matairesinol Eq. | Tyrosol Eq. | Cardol Eq. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH | 1 | n.s. | 1 ** | 0.84 * | 0.95 ** | 0.92 * | 0.96 ** | n.s. | n.s. | 0.59 |
| FRAP | n.s. | 1 | n.s. | −0.74 | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | 0.90 | −0.84 | −0.61 |
| TPC | 1 ** | n.s. | 1 | −0.84 | 0.95 | −0.92 | 0.96 ** | n.s. | n.s. | 0.59 |
| Cyanidin Eq. | 0.84 * | −0.74 | −0.84 | 1 | −0.64 | 0.56 | −0.65 | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
| Luteolin Eq. | 0.95 ** | n.s. | 0.95 | −0.64 | 1 | −0.99 * | 1 * | −0.45 | 0.56 | 0.80 |
| Catechin Eq. | 0.92 * | n.s. | −0.92 | 0.56 | −0.99 * | 1 | −0.99 | 0.54 | −0.64 | −0.86 |
| Ferulate Eq. | 0.96 ** | n.s. | 0.96 ** | −0.65 | 1 * | −0.99 | 1 | −0.44 | 0.54 | 0.79 |
| Matairesinol Eq. | n.s. | 0.90 | n.s. | n.s. | −0.45 | 0.54 | −0.44 | 1 | −0.99 | −0.89 |
| Tyrosol Eq. | n.s. | −0.84 | n.s. | n.s. | 0.56 | −0.64 | 0.54 | −0.99 | 1 | 0.94 |
| Cardol Eq. | 0.59 | −0.61 | 0.59 | n.s. | 0.80 | −0.86 | 0.79 | −0.89 | 0.94 | 1 |