Ulrike Boehmer1, Al Ozonoff2,3, Michael Winter4, Flora Berklein4, Jennifer Potter2,5,6, Kevan L Hartshorn7, Kevin C Ward8, Rachel M Ceballos9, Melissa A Clark10. 1. Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Biostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Fenway Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Section of Hematology Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 8. Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 9. Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. 10. Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the health-related quality of life of sexual minority survivors in comparison with heterosexual survivors. METHODS: Four hundred eighty eligible survivors participated in a telephone survey that measured survivors' outcomes, which consisted of physical and mental quality of life and self-rated fair or poor health. These survivors were diagnosed with stage I, II, or III colorectal cancer an average of 3 years before the survey and were recruited from 4 cancer registries. Using forward selection with generalized linear models or logistic regression models, the authors considered 4 domains-personal factors, environmental factors, health condition characteristics, and body function and structure-as correlates for each survivorship outcome. RESULTS: The authors found that unadjusted physical quality of life and self-rated fair/poor health were similar for all survivors. Sexual minority survivors had poorer unadjusted mental quality of life in comparison with heterosexual survivors. After adjustments for covariates, this difference was no longer statistically significant. Three domains (personal factors, health condition characteristics, and body function and structure) explained colorectal cancer survivors' fair/poor health and 46% of the variance in physical quality of life, whereas 56% of the variance in mental quality of life was explained by personal factors, body function and structure, and environmental factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified modifiable factors that can be used to improve cancer survivors' quality of life and are, therefore, relevant to ongoing efforts to improve the survivorship experience.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the health-related quality of life of sexual minority survivors in comparison with heterosexual survivors. METHODS: Four hundred eighty eligible survivors participated in a telephone survey that measured survivors' outcomes, which consisted of physical and mental quality of life and self-rated fair or poor health. These survivors were diagnosed with stage I, II, or III colorectal cancer an average of 3 years before the survey and were recruited from 4 cancer registries. Using forward selection with generalized linear models or logistic regression models, the authors considered 4 domains-personal factors, environmental factors, health condition characteristics, and body function and structure-as correlates for each survivorship outcome. RESULTS: The authors found that unadjusted physical quality of life and self-rated fair/poor health were similar for all survivors. Sexual minority survivors had poorer unadjusted mental quality of life in comparison with heterosexual survivors. After adjustments for covariates, this difference was no longer statistically significant. Three domains (personal factors, health condition characteristics, and body function and structure) explained colorectal cancer survivors' fair/poor health and 46% of the variance in physical quality of life, whereas 56% of the variance in mental quality of life was explained by personal factors, body function and structure, and environmental factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified modifiable factors that can be used to improve cancer survivors' quality of life and are, therefore, relevant to ongoing efforts to improve the survivorship experience.
Authors: Susan A Sabatino; Trevor D Thompson; Judith Lee Smith; Julia H Rowland; Laura P Forsythe; Loria Pollack; Nikki A Hawkins Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Michael King; Joanna Semlyen; Sharon See Tai; Helen Killaspy; David Osborn; Dmitri Popelyuk; Irwin Nazareth Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2008-08-18 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Claire O'Gorman; Jim Stack; Alan O'Ceilleachair; Suzanne Denieffe; Martina Gooney; Martina McKnight; Linda Sharp Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 4.430