Literature DB >> 29460842

Engineering principles for guiding spheroid function in the regeneration of bone, cartilage, and skin.

Marissa A Gionet-Gonzales1, J Kent Leach.   

Abstract

There is a critical need for strategies that effectively enhance cell viability and post-implantation performance in order to advance cell-based therapies. Spheroids, which are dense cellular aggregates, overcome many current limitations with transplanting individual cells. Compared to individual cells, the aggregation of cells into spheroids results in increased cell viability, together with enhanced proangiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and tissue-forming potential. Furthermore, the transplantation of cells using engineered materials enables localized delivery to the target site while providing an opportunity to guide cell fate in situ, resulting in improved therapeutic outcomes compared to systemic or localized injection. Despite promising early results achieved by freely injecting spheroids into damaged tissues, growing evidence demonstrates the advantages of entrapping spheroids within a biomaterial prior to implantation. This review will highlight the basic characteristics and qualities of spheroids, describe the underlying principles for how biomaterials influence spheroid behavior, with an emphasis on hydrogels, and provide examples of synergistic approaches using spheroids and biomaterials for tissue engineering applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29460842      PMCID: PMC5898817          DOI: 10.1088/1748-605X/aab0b3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1748-6041            Impact factor:   3.715


  122 in total

1.  Defining the actual sensitivity and specificity of the neurosphere assay in stem cell biology.

Authors:  Ilyas Singec; Rolf Knoth; Ralf P Meyer; Jaroslaw Maciaczyk; Benedikt Volk; Guido Nikkhah; Michael Frotscher; Evan Y Snyder
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Generation of co-culture spheroids as vascularisation units for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  R Walser; W Metzger; A Görg; T Pohlemann; M D Menger; M W Laschke
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.942

3.  Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting.

Authors:  Cyrille Norotte; Francois S Marga; Laura E Niklason; Gabor Forgacs
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Microfluidic Generation of Monodisperse, Structurally Homogeneous Alginate Microgels for Cell Encapsulation and 3D Cell Culture.

Authors:  Stefanie Utech; Radivoje Prodanovic; Angelo S Mao; Raluca Ostafe; David J Mooney; David A Weitz
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 5.  Advances in polymeric islet cell encapsulation technologies to limit the foreign body response and provide immunoisolation.

Authors:  Alan J Ryan; Hugh S O'Neill; Garry P Duffy; Fergal J O'Brien
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 5.547

Review 6.  Designing materials to direct stem-cell fate.

Authors:  Matthias P Lutolf; Penney M Gilbert; Helen M Blau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A nano-hydroxyapatite--pullulan/dextran polysaccharide composite macroporous material for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jean Christophe Fricain; Silke Schlaubitz; Catherine Le Visage; Isabelle Arnault; Sidi Mohammed Derkaoui; Robin Siadous; Sylvain Catros; Charlotte Lalande; Reine Bareille; Martine Renard; Thierry Fabre; Sandro Cornet; Marlène Durand; Alain Léonard; Nouredine Sahraoui; Didier Letourneur; Joëlle Amédée
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Human cartilage repair with a photoreactive adhesive-hydrogel composite.

Authors:  Blanka Sharma; Sara Fermanian; Matthew Gibson; Shimon Unterman; Daniel A Herzka; Brett Cascio; Jeannine Coburn; Alexander Y Hui; Norman Marcus; Garry E Gold; Jennifer H Elisseeff
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Generation of Multicellular Tumor Spheroids with Microwell-Based Agarose Scaffolds for Drug Testing.

Authors:  Xue Gong; Chao Lin; Jian Cheng; Jiansheng Su; Hang Zhao; Tianlin Liu; Xuejun Wen; Peng Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mesenchymal Stem Cell Spheroids Retain Osteogenic Phenotype Through α2β1 Signaling.

Authors:  Kaitlin C Murphy; Allison I Hoch; Jenna N Harvestine; Dejie Zhou; J Kent Leach
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 6.940

View more
  14 in total

1.  Conditioning of myoblast secretome using mesenchymal stem/stromal cell spheroids improves bone repair.

Authors:  Augustine M Saiz; Marissa A Gionet-Gonzales; Mark A Lee; J Kent Leach
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Three-Dimensional Printed Stamps for the Fabrication of Patterned Microwells and High-Throughput Production of Homogeneous Cell Spheroids.

Authors:  Tomas Gonzalez-Fernandez; Alejandro J Tenorio; J Kent Leach
Journal:  3D Print Addit Manuf       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 5.449

3.  Porous bio-click microgel scaffolds control hMSC interactions and promote their secretory properties.

Authors:  Alexander S Caldwell; Varsha V Rao; Alyxandra C Golden; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Engineered Cell-Secreted Extracellular Matrix Modulates Cell Spheroid Mechanosensing and Amplifies Their Response to Inductive Cues for the Formation of Mineralized Tissues.

Authors:  Tomas Gonzalez-Fernandez; Alejandro J Tenorio; Augustine M Saiz; J Kent Leach
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 11.092

5.  Granular PEG hydrogels mediate osteoporotic MSC clustering via N-cadherin influencing the pro-resorptive bias of their secretory profile.

Authors:  Varsha V Rao; Marissa E Wechsler; Emily Cravens; Samantha J Wojda; Alexander S Caldwell; Bruce E Kirkpatrick; Seth W Donahue; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 10.633

6.  Evaluation of scaffold microstructure and comparison of cell seeding methods using micro-computed tomography-based tools.

Authors:  Aleksi Palmroth; Sanna Pitkänen; Markus Hannula; Kaarlo Paakinaho; Jari Hyttinen; Susanna Miettinen; Minna Kellomäki
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  Engineering the MSC Secretome: A Hydrogel Focused Approach.

Authors:  Marissa E Wechsler; Varsha V Rao; Alexandra N Borelli; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 9.933

8.  Neuron and astrocyte aggregation and sorting in three-dimensional neuronal constructs.

Authors:  Md Fayad Hasan; Yevgeny Berdichevsky
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-05-17

9.  Tissue Specific Differentiation of Human Chondrocytes Depends on Cell Microenvironment and Serum Selection.

Authors:  Annemarie Ecke; Anne-Helen Lutter; Jenny Scholka; Anna Hansch; Roland Becker; Ursula Anderer
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 10.  Tissue engineered platforms for studying primary and metastatic neoplasm behavior in bone.

Authors:  Victoria L Thai; Katherine H Griffin; Steven W Thorpe; R Lor Randall; J Kent Leach
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.