Kaitlin C Murphy1, Allison I Hoch1, Jenna N Harvestine1, Dejie Zhou1, J Kent Leach2. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA jkleach@ucdavis.edu.
Cell-based therapies represent an exciting strategy for driving nonhealing bone repair and addressing concerns regarding bone tissue availability and donor site morbidity associated with the gold standard autograft. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a promising cell population for use in bone tissue engineering because of their proliferative, osteogenic, and proangiogenic potential. MSCs are typically differentiated in an osteogenic cocktail prior to transplantation to enhance their mineral deposition and integration into the surrounding bone. Although it is commonly assumed that this pretreatment regimen translates to phenotype preservation once delivered in vivo, we demonstrated that human MSCs rapidly dedifferentiate upon removal of the stimulus [1]. However, changes in the cell phenotype were sustained when MSCs were deployed with a biologically relevant extracellular matrix (ECM), providing continued instruction and enhancing bone formation in vivo.MSCspheroids, multicellular aggregates formed through cell-cell interactions, are under widespread investigation for tissue repair. MSCspheroids exhibit enhanced prosurvival [2, 3], proangiogenic [4-6], and anti-inflammatory [7] properties in comparison with dissociated cells expanded in monolayer culture. Additionally, spheroid formation does not hinder their osteogenic potential [8]. These advantages originate from their unique culture geometry, inducing a complex microenvironment within the spheroid that better reflects the complex in vivo milieu [3, 9, 10]. Furthermore, delivering MSCs as spheroids bypasses the deleterious trypsinization step required to free cells from traditional monolayer culture, preserving their intact ECM and cell-cell contacts formed during culture. Successful bone repair requires prolonged transplanted cell survival, angiogenesis, and mineral deposition [11-14]. Thus the inherent properties of MSCspheroids make them uniquely suited for bone tissue engineering applications.Although others have transplanted spheroids in vivo in the absence of a biomaterial carrier to stimulate neovascularization [3], the deployment of cells in a hydrogel can promote cell persistence and provide continuous biophysical cues. The successful deployment of MSCspheroids in a functional biomaterial may promote their tissue regenerative potential. Type I collagen is the predominant organic matrix found in bone, and collagen I hydrogels are well established as an osteogenic biomaterial [15]. MSCs engage with the collagen fibrils through an integrin-signaling cascade leading to upregulation of osteoblast-related genes [16]. Thus, collagen gels represent an ideal platform for investigating the role of cell culture geometry on persistence of an induced osteoblastic phenotype.We hypothesized that osteogenically induced MSCs formed into three-dimensional (3D) spheroids would exhibit a more sustained osteoblastic phenotype than dissociated MSCs when encapsulated in a collagen hydrogel. To explore this hypothesis, we examined the osteogenic and proangiogenic potential of MSCspheroids in comparison with cells expanded in monolayer culture before and after entrapment in a collagen hydrogel. In an effort to model deploying cells to a defect without exogenous soluble osteogenic cues, we entrapped cells in a collagen gel and removed the stimulus. Although cadherins have been implicated as mediators in spheroid formation [17], we examined alternative mechanisms by which MSCspheroids were able to retain their osteoblastic phenotype by interrogating integrin signaling. Here we show that α2β1 signaling to cell-secreted collagen facilitates MSC spheroid’s retention of their osteoblastic phenotype. The results of this study demonstrate the capacity of 3D culture to enhance the clinical translation of MSCs for bone tissue repair.
Materials and Methods
Cell Culture
Human bone marrow-derived MSCs (Lonza, Walkersville, MD, http://www.lonza.com) were used without further characterization and passaged prior to confluence in growth medium: α-modified minimum essential medium (α-MEM; Thermo Fisher Scientific Life Sciences, Waltham, MA, http://www.thermofisher.com) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (JR Scientific, Woodland, CA, http://www.jrscientific.com), 1% penicillin (10,000 U/ml), and streptomycin (10 mg/ml) (Gemini Bio-Products, Sacramento, CA, http://www.gembio.com). MSCs were expanded under standard culture conditions (37°C, 5% CO2, 21% O2).
MSC Spheroid Formation
MSCs were seeded at 2,000 cells per cm2 in 225-cm2 flasks (Corning, Corning, NY, https://www.corning.com) and cultured for 12 days prior to passage in growth media (GM) or osteogenic media (OM). Osteogenic media consisted of growth media supplemented with 50 µg/ml ascorbate-2-phosphate, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, and 100 nM dexamethasone (all from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, https://www.sigmaaldrich.com). Medium changes were performed every third day. To recover cells, we incubated MSCs with 0.3% collagenase II (Worthington Biochemical Corp., Lakewood, NJ, http://www.worthington-biochem.com) to disrupt matrix prior to adding 0.05% trypsin/0.53 mM EDTA (Corning). MSCs were formed into spheroids using the hanging-drop technique with 15,000 cells per 25-μl droplet [4]. The resulting spheroid previously exhibited increased metabolic activity, reduced apoptosis, and uniform distribution of proliferating cells in comparison with larger spheroids. As a control, MSCs were plated as adherent monolayers at 10,000 cells per cm2 and to avoid the confounding variable of endogenous matrix accumulation during the first 12 days in culture. MSCs were maintained in spheroids or monolayer for an additional 2 days for a total of 2 weeks of osteogenic induction.
Entrapment of MSCs Within Collagen Hydrogels
Collagen hydrogels were prepared by mixing MSCs with the following reagents: 10× α-MEM (10%), 5 N NaOH (0.4%), deionized water (39.6%), and rat tail collagen I (50%; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, http://www.bdbiosciences.com) for a final collagen concentration of 4 mg/ml. We formed 100-µl collagen hydrogels containing 4.5 × 106 MSCs per milliliter in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) molds as previously described [18]. Collagen hydrogels containing osteogenically induced MSCs were incubated at 37°C for 3 hours, released from the PDMS molds, and transferred to 24-well plates containing growth media for an additional 5 days (OM/GM). As a positive control, osteogenically induced MSCs remained in OM. MSCs cultured in GM for the full duration served as the negative control. Osteogenic markers were assessed at +1 day (+1d) and at +5 days (+5d), where 0d marks the day cells were entrapped in hydrogels and osteogenic media were switched to growth media (OM/GM). Gels were maintained in standard cell culture conditions with medium changes performed every 3 days (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
Adherent and spheroidal mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were encapsulated within collagen I hydrogels and cultured in three medium regimens. After 12 days of culture in growth or osteogenic media, cells were trypsinized and formed into spheroids or replated in adherent monolayer. After 2 days of spheroidal or adherent culture in the same media, cells were encapsulated within collagen gels. (A): MSCs cultured in growth media for the full duration (GM) served as the negative control. (B): Osteogenic media were replaced with growth media for an additional 5 days (+5d) (OM/GM). (C): As a positive control, osteogenically induced MSCs remained in OM. Osteogenic markers were assessed at +1d and +5d, where 0d marks the day cells were entrapped in hydrogels and osteogenic media were switched to growth media (OM/GM). Abbreviations: ASP, ascorbate-2-phosphate; BGP, β-glycerophosphate; d, day; Dex, dexamethasone; GM, growth media; OM, osteogenic media.
Adherent and spheroidal mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were encapsulated within collagen I hydrogels and cultured in three medium regimens. After 12 days of culture in growth or osteogenic media, cells were trypsinized and formed into spheroids or replated in adherent monolayer. After 2 days of spheroidal or adherent culture in the same media, cells were encapsulated within collagen gels. (A): MSCs cultured in growth media for the full duration (GM) served as the negative control. (B): Osteogenic media were replaced with growth media for an additional 5 days (+5d) (OM/GM). (C): As a positive control, osteogenically induced MSCs remained in OM. Osteogenic markers were assessed at +1d and +5d, where 0d marks the day cells were entrapped in hydrogels and osteogenic media were switched to growth media (OM/GM). Abbreviations: ASP, ascorbate-2-phosphate; BGP, β-glycerophosphate; d, day; Dex, dexamethasone; GM, growth media; OM, osteogenic media.
Measurement of Osteogenic and Proangiogenic Potential of MSCs
We limited the osteogenic induction period to 2 weeks because longer induction durations do not significantly preserve the osteoblastic phenotype upon soluble stimulus withdrawal [1]. The baseline osteogenic and proangiogenic potentials of spheroids and adherent cells were quantified using biochemical assays and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) prior to entrapment within collagen hydrogels. Intracellular alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was quantified as previously described [19] and normalized to total DNA content from the same lysate quantified using the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Life Sciences). Calcium deposition was quantified as previously described [20] and normalized to DNA content from the same lysate. After +1d and +5d (days following medium change), collagen hydrogels were collected within microcentrifuge tubes containing 100 μl of passive lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, http://www.promega.com) and sonicated on ice prior to analysis. ALP activity and calcium content were then quantified.Gene expression was assessed by quantitative PCR as previously described [12, 19]. Total RNA was collected using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, https://www.qiagen.com) and 480 ng of total RNA was reverse-transcribed with the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen). The qPCR was performed using TaqMan1 Universal PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific Life Sciences, Waltham, MA, http://www.thermofisher.com) on a Mastercycler1 realplex2 (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, https://www.eppendorf.com). Primers and probes consisted of COL1A1 (Hs01076777_m1), VEGFA (Hs00900055_m1), and RPL13 (Hs00204173_m1) (Thermo Fisher Scientific Life Sciences). Quantitative PCR results were normalized to housekeeping transcript level (RPL13) to yield ΔCt.To measure vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion, we refreshed the media 24 hours before collection, and VEGF concentration was determined using a human-specific VEGF ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, https://www.rndsystems.com/) according to the manufacturer’s instructions [4, 21].
Characterization of ECM Components Within MSC Spheroids
Spheroids that received osteogenic media or growth media for 2 weeks were collected prior to hydrogel encapsulation to assess the effect of osteogenic induction on matrix deposition within the spheroid. Spheroids were collected and fixed in 10% formalin, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and then embedded in HistoGel (Thermo Fisher Scientific Life Sciences). Collagen gels were fixed in 10% formalin, washed with PBS, and soaked in O.C.T. compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA, http://www.sakura-americas.com) overnight. Samples were encased in O.C.T. compound, and 10-µm sections were cut on a Leica CM1850 Cryostat (Leica Microsystems, Bannockburn, IL, http://www.leica-microsystems.com) and mounted onto microscope slides (VWR Superfrost Plus Micro Slide; VWR International, Radnor, PA, https://us.vwr.com) for analysis. Immunohistochemistry was performed using a mouse-specific horseradish peroxidase (HRP)/3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) detection kit (Abcam, Cambridge, U.K., http://www.abcam.com) in conjunction with primary antibodies for type 1 collagen (1:1000, Abcam 90395, Abcam), fibronectin (1:50, 2Q604; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, http://www.scbt.com), and α2β1 integrin (1:30, AB24697; Abcam). Additionally, we performed a Picrosirius Red (PSR; Abcam) stain, counterstained with hematoxylin, to further elucidate differences in collagen deposition. Lastly, collagen gel sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Spheroid sections were imaged using a Nikon Eclipse TE2000U microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY, http://www.nikon.com) and Andor Zyla digital camera (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, U.K., http://www.oxford-instruments.com).
Measurement of Mechanical Properties of Collagen Hydrogels
The storage modulus of acellular and cellular collagen hydrogels was measured using a Discovery HR2 Hybrid Rheometer (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, http://www.tainstruments.com) as we described [22]. An oscillatory sweep of 0.004%–4% strain was performed on each hydrogel using a cone and plate (1° angle). Storage moduli in the linear viscoelastic region were averaged from n ≥ 5 points per gel, and resultant averages were calculated from n = 4 gels.
Integrin-Mediated Contribution Toward Preservation of Osteoblastic Markers
We investigated the contribution of an integrin-mediated mechanism by adding 5 μg/ml α2β1 blocking antibody (AB24697, Abcam) to every medium change starting from the first passage following 12 days of culture. Control groups were maintained in media supplemented with an equal volume of PBS. The distribution of cells expressing collagen was determined by immunohistochemistry. At +5d, hydrogels were fixed in phosphate-buffered formalin for 24 hours, after which point they were soaked in O.C.T. overnight. They were then cryosectioned at 5 μm thickness. Sections were stained for Picrosirius Red, H&E, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a primary antibody against type 1 collagen in conjugation with a mouse-specific HRP/DAB detection kit as described above.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as means ± SD from at least four independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons or paired t tests when appropriate. All statistical analyses were performed using Prism 6 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, http://www.graphpad.com); p values less than .05 were considered statistically significant. Significance is denoted by alphabetical letterings; groups with no significance are linked by the same letters, whereas groups with significance do not share the same letters.
Results
MSC Spheroids Are Responsive to Osteogenic Induction
Adherent cells exhibited greater baseline ALP activity than did spheroids after culture in osteogenic media (OM) (Fig. 2A); however, total calcium was comparable (Fig. 2C). As expected, adherent cells cultured in OM exhibited greater ALP activity than did adherent cells in growth media (GM). Differences in ALP activity and calcium content for GM cultures may be attributed to reduced DNA content in MSCspheroids in comparison with adherent MSCs (Fig. 2B), perhaps because of contact inhibition in spheroids. We further probed the baseline osteogenic status via gene expression of spheroids and adherent cells. MSCs cultured as spheroids or adherent cells in OM exhibited greater COL1A1 expression than did their GM counterparts (Fig. 2D). COL1A1 expression of adherent MSCs was significantly higher than that of spheroids when both groups were cultured in OM.
Figure 2.
Mesenchymal stem cells spheroids are responsive to osteogenic induction prior to encapsulation in collagen gels. Cells were cultured in growth media or osteogenic media for 12 days prior to being formed into spheroids or replated in adherent monolayers and analyzed for alkaline phosphatase activity (A), DNA content (B), total calcium (C), and COL1A1 gene expression (D). Chart values represent mean ± SD for n = 4. Significance is denoted by alphabetical letterings; groups with no significance are linked by the same letters, and groups with significance do not share the same letters. Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GM, growth media; OM, osteogenic media.
Mesenchymal stem cells spheroids are responsive to osteogenic induction prior to encapsulation in collagen gels. Cells were cultured in growth media or osteogenic media for 12 days prior to being formed into spheroids or replated in adherent monolayers and analyzed for alkaline phosphatase activity (A), DNA content (B), total calcium (C), and COL1A1 gene expression (D). Chart values represent mean ± SD for n = 4. Significance is denoted by alphabetical letterings; groups with no significance are linked by the same letters, and groups with significance do not share the same letters. Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GM, growth media; OM, osteogenic media.When quantifying baseline proangiogenic potential, we detected a significant increase in normalized and total VEGF protein secretion for MSCspheroids in comparison with adherent MSCs cultured in GM. However, this advantage was abrogated when the MSCs were cultured in OM (Fig. 3A, 3B). Unlike VEGF secretion, VEGFA expression was greater for spheroids in both media formulations (Fig. 3C). Overall, VEGF production by MSCs in OM was reduced in comparison with MSCs in GM, and this reduction is consistent with our previous findings with adherent MSCs in that the proangiogenic potential of MSCs is impaired when osteogenically induced [19].
Figure 3.
The proangiogenic potential of mesenchymal stem cell spheroids is dependent on osteogenic induction prior to encapsulation in collagen gels. Cells were cultured in growth media or osteogenic media for 12 days prior to being formed into spheroids or replated in adherent monolayers and analyzed for normalized VEGF secretion (A), total vascular endothelial growth factor secretion (B), and VEGFA gene expression (C). Chart values represent mean ± SD for n = 4. Significance is denoted by alphabetical letterings; groups with no significance are linked by the same letters, and groups with significance do not share the same letters. Abbreviations: GM, growth media; OM, osteogenic media; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
The proangiogenic potential of mesenchymal stem cell spheroids is dependent on osteogenic induction prior to encapsulation in collagen gels. Cells were cultured in growth media or osteogenic media for 12 days prior to being formed into spheroids or replated in adherent monolayers and analyzed for normalized VEGF secretion (A), total vascular endothelial growth factor secretion (B), and VEGFA gene expression (C). Chart values represent mean ± SD for n = 4. Significance is denoted by alphabetical letterings; groups with no significance are linked by the same letters, and groups with significance do not share the same letters. Abbreviations: GM, growth media; OM, osteogenic media; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
ECM Deposition in MSC Spheroids Is Enhanced by Osteogenic Differentiation
To visualize critical ECM components within aggregates, we sectioned MSCspheroids and stained for total collagen (Fig. 4A, 4B), fibronectin (Fig. 4C, 4D), and α2β1 expression (Fig. 4E, 4F). MSCspheroids cultured in osteogenic media (OM) stained more intensely for these ECM components than did their growth media (GM) counterparts. The α2β1 activity was more evident in spheroids cultured in OM. Spheroids cultured in GM appeared less compact and had less punctate staining.
Figure 4.
Characterization of extracellular matrix components within mesenchymal stem cell spheroids preconditioned in either growth media or osteogenic media. (A, B): Picrosirius Red. (C, D): Fibronectin. (E, F): α2β1. Scale bar = 200 µm. Abbreviations: GM, growth media; OM, osteogenic media; PSR, Picrosirius Red.
Characterization of extracellular matrix components within mesenchymal stem cell spheroids preconditioned in either growth media or osteogenic media. (A, B): Picrosirius Red. (C, D): Fibronectin. (E, F): α2β1. Scale bar = 200 µm. Abbreviations: GM, growth media; OM, osteogenic media; PSR, Picrosirius Red.
MSC Spheroids Promote Continued Osteogenic Differentiation in Collagen Hydrogels
A minimally viscous hydrogel was a design criterion to study the response of MSCs in a biomaterial following removal of osteoinductive cues. Materials with enhanced mechanical properties facilitate osteogenic differentiation [21, 23] and may act as a confounding variable. Acellular collagen hydrogels exhibited a shear storage modulus, G′ = 2.34 ± 0.62 Pa. We did not detect significant differences in shear storage moduli between acellular and cellular collagen hydrogels (data not shown).After cells were encapsulated in collagen hydrogels, we measured osteogenic and proangiogenic markers as a function of stimulus withdrawal. Because there were no statistical differences between groups at +1d, we normalized values from +5d to those from the same group at +1d to evaluate osteoblastic phenotype retention. Overall calcium secretion increased over time for all gels containing dissociated MSCs, yet there were no significant differences between media groups (Fig. 5A). Spheroids cultured in the presence of osteogenic cues significantly outperformed dissociated MSCs under the same culture conditions, as well as spheroids cultured in GM. Although spheroids cultured in OM for the entire duration had slightly more calcium deposition, there were no statistical differences in calcium levels for MSCspheroids cultured in hydrogels with or without continuous osteogenic cues (OM/GM and OM). In contrast to calcium content, VEGF secretion decreased from +1d to +5d, regardless of culture geometry (Fig. 5B). There was a general trend for reduced VEGF secretion by osteogenically induced MSCs. These data are in contrast to those observed in MSCs prior to entrapment in collagen gels, because MSCspheroids had greater VEGF secretion in GM.
Figure 5.
Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) spheroids exhibit sustained persistence of osteogenic markers in the absence of cues when encapsulated within collagen I hydrogels. MSC-loaded hydrogels were subjected to stimulus withdrawal (osteogenic media [OM]/growth media [GM]) and included a positive (OM) and negative control (GM). Hydrogels were analyzed for calcium deposition (A) and secreted vascular endothelial growth factor (B). Chart values represent mean day 5 values normalized to the mean day 1 values ± SD for n = 4. Significance is denoted by alphabetical letterings; groups with no significance are linked by the same letters, whereas groups with significance do not share the same letters. Abbreviations: GM, growth media; OM, osteogenic media; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) spheroids exhibit sustained persistence of osteogenic markers in the absence of cues when encapsulated within collagen I hydrogels. MSC-loaded hydrogels were subjected to stimulus withdrawal (osteogenic media [OM]/growth media [GM]) and included a positive (OM) and negative control (GM). Hydrogels were analyzed for calcium deposition (A) and secreted vascular endothelial growth factor (B). Chart values represent mean day 5 values normalized to the mean day 1 values ± SD for n = 4. Significance is denoted by alphabetical letterings; groups with no significance are linked by the same letters, whereas groups with significance do not share the same letters. Abbreviations: GM, growth media; OM, osteogenic media; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Osteogenic Commitment of MSC Spheroids Is α2β1-Dependent
Previous reports confirm spheroidal culture upregulates the transcription of numerous collagen matrix proteins in comparison with adherent monolayer culture [24]. Our laboratory has shown that cell-secreted matrices predominantly consist of collagen type I [25] and drive bone formation in vivo by MSCs [1]. The α2β1 integrin regulates the survival and osteogenic differentiation of MSCs on collagen type I [26, 27]. Thus, we investigated whether blocking the α2β1 integrin on MSCs would abrogate the osteogenic response. Neither spheroid formation nor spheroid diameter was affected by the presence of the α2β1 antibody (data not shown). We analyzed preservation of osteogenic markers only at +5d, because we did not detect discernable differences in osteogenic potential of MSCspheroids or dissociated cells at +1d when entrapped in collagen gels. Addition of the α2β1 antibody increased ALP activity in dissociated MSCs (Fig. 6A), whereas ALP activity in MSCspheroids remained relatively constant and comparable in magnitude to levels in antibody-treated dissociated MSCs. Cell-secreted calcium was examined as a late-stage marker of osteogenesis. Dissociated MSCs exhibited equal levels of calcium secretion in the presence of the α2β1 antibody, yet calcium secretion in MSCspheroids was abrogated by antibody treatment (Fig. 6B). VEGF secretion followed the inverse trend of calcium deposition; MSCspheroids secreted more VEGF in the presence of the α2β1 antibody, though there was no significant effect in antibody-treated dissociated MSCs (Fig. 6C). Taken together, these data provide evidence that VEGF secretion may serve as a negative indicator of MSC osteodifferentiation state in this model.
Figure 6.
Markers of osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) spheroids are sustained in the absence of osteoinductive cues through an α2β1 integrin-mediated mechanism. Osteogenically induced MSCs were dissociated or formed as spheroids and encapsulated within collagen I hydrogels before stimulus withdrawal (OM/GM). Medium changes were performed regularly with culture media (control) or media supplemented with 5 ng/ml α2β1 blocking antibody. Analysis was performed at +5 days for alkaline phosphatase activity (A), calcium deposition (B), and vascular endothelial growth factor secretion (C). Chart values represent mean ± SD for n = 5. Significance is denoted by alphabetical letterings; groups with no significance are linked by the same letters, whereas groups with significance do not share the same letters. Abbreviations: α2β1 Ab, α2β1 blocking antibody; ALP, alkaline phosphatase activity; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Markers of osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) spheroids are sustained in the absence of osteoinductive cues through an α2β1 integrin-mediated mechanism. Osteogenically induced MSCs were dissociated or formed as spheroids and encapsulated within collagen I hydrogels before stimulus withdrawal (OM/GM). Medium changes were performed regularly with culture media (control) or media supplemented with 5 ng/ml α2β1 blocking antibody. Analysis was performed at +5 days for alkaline phosphatase activity (A), calcium deposition (B), and vascular endothelial growth factor secretion (C). Chart values represent mean ± SD for n = 5. Significance is denoted by alphabetical letterings; groups with no significance are linked by the same letters, whereas groups with significance do not share the same letters. Abbreviations: α2β1 Ab, α2β1 blocking antibody; ALP, alkaline phosphatase activity; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.To further examine the role of the cell-secreted ECM on MSC osteogenic potential within collagen hydrogels, we visualized total collagen (Fig. 7A, 7B), general morphology via H&E (Fig. 7C, 7D), and type 1 collagen (Fig. 7E, 7F) at +5d. MSCspheroids entrapped in collagen gels secreted more collagen and connective tissue constituents than did dissociated MSCs and demonstrated areas of clustered cells. In contrast, collagen gels containing dissociated cells had lower levels of only diffuse staining throughout. These stains indicate that spheroids retain their ECM when entrapped in a collagen gel and that the dissociated cells are unable to produce the same quantity of self-secreted collagen in the 5-day time span.
Figure 7.
Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) spheroids exhibit differences in matrix protein content compared with dissociated MSCs when entrapped in collagen hydrogels. Osteogenically induced adherent and spheroidal MSCs encapsulated within collagen I hydrogels were subjected to stimulus withdrawal (osteogenic media/growth media). Immunohistochemistry was performed at +5 days for Picrosirius Red (A, B), H&E (C, D), and type 1 collagen (E, F). Asterisks indicate areas of interest. Scale bar represents 500 µm. Abbreviations: Col1, Type 1 collagen; Diss., dissociated mesenchymal stem cells; PSR, Picrosirius Red; Sph., mesenchymal stem cell spheroids.
Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) spheroids exhibit differences in matrix protein content compared with dissociated MSCs when entrapped in collagen hydrogels. Osteogenically induced adherent and spheroidal MSCs encapsulated within collagen I hydrogels were subjected to stimulus withdrawal (osteogenic media/growth media). Immunohistochemistry was performed at +5 days for Picrosirius Red (A, B), H&E (C, D), and type 1 collagen (E, F). Asterisks indicate areas of interest. Scale bar represents 500 µm. Abbreviations: Col1, Type 1 collagen; Diss., dissociated mesenchymal stem cells; PSR, Picrosirius Red; Sph., mesenchymal stem cell spheroids.
Discussion
In an attempt to enhance bone formation in vivo, MSCs are typically osteogenically induced with a cocktail of common soluble supplements [28-30]. We recently demonstrated that even after 6 weeks of induction using these osteogenic supplements, human MSCs rapidly dedifferentiate as early as 24 hours following stimulus withdrawal. However, their osteogenic phenotype could be preserved if the induced MSCs were cultured on decellularized extracellular matrix (ECM) [1]. MSCspheroids represent an exciting alternative to the traditional cell-based therapeutic strategies using dissociated cells from monolayer culture [4]. Spheroidal culture allows for the MSCs to still be entrapped in a biomaterial yet retain their intact ECM and cell-cell contacts formed during spheroid formation [3]. Therefore, we hypothesized that forming MSCs into spheroids would preserve their phenotype through ECM-mediated interactions.To explore this hypothesis, we formed MSCspheroids from osteoinduced cells, entrapped them in collagen gels, and analyzed their osteogenic and proangiogenic potential before and after encapsulation. In agreement with our previous data, MSCspheroids had similar calcium secretion but decreased ALP activity in comparison with MSCs in monolayer culture prior to encapsulation in collagen hydrogels in both growth medium and osteogenic medium [4]. The higher ALP activity and increased COL1A1 expression in adherent MSC monolayers may be derived from differences in mechanical stimuli, because adherent monolayers were on stiff tissue culture plastic (TCP), whereas spheroids were suspended in media with no outside mechanical stimulus. In standard culture conditions, MSCspheroids had increased proangiogenic potential in comparison with adherent monolayers, yet this advantage was lost once cultured in the presence of osteogenic supplements. Once entrapped in collagen hydrogels, MSCspheroids exhibited stronger and persistent osteogenic potential in the absence of soluble cues in comparison with osteogenically induced dissociated MSCs. Importantly, the osteogenic potential of MSCspheroids increased from +1d to +5d in the absence of soluble osteoinductive stimuli. Dissociated MSCs did not suffer from the same rapid decline in osteogenic potential that we previously observed in two dimensions (2D) [1]. This is most likely due to the fact that 3D collagen I culture enhances osteogenic differentiation of MSCs through signaling pathways such as extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) and α2β1 more robustly than does 2D culture [31].Bone is a highly vascularized tissue, and many studies have shown that increased angiogenesis directly correlates with increased bone formation [14, 32, 33]. However, the proangiogenic potential of human MSCs commonly decreases as the osteogenic potential increases in both 2D and 3D cultures [19, 21]. In agreement with our previous work, MSCspheroids cultured in GM were significantly more proangiogenic than were their adherent counterparts prior to encapsulation in collagen hydrogels [4]. Whereas VEGF gene expression was increased in spheroids regardless of media, VEGF secretion, measured in conditioned media, was diminished in both culture geometries when cultured in OM. This may be because spheroids are rich in ECM proteins, possibly sequestering the VEGF within the spheroid itself. However, because functional protein levels are more impactful on the surrounding endothelial cells, we chose to measure secreted VEGF instead of gene expression for the remaining studies. Once entrapped in collagen hydrogels, the spheroids maintained their osteogenic phenotype at the expense of their proangiogenic potential. This differs slightly from our prior work in fibrin hydrogels, in which MSCspheroids exhibited comparable osteogenic potential to dissociated cells when cultured in osteogenic media and up to a 100-fold increase in VEGF secretion when cultured in serum deprivation and hypoxia [4]. These discrepancies likely arise because of differences in media conditions and the choice of biomaterial. Collagen is a mature protein in homeostatic tissues and directly promotes osteogenic differentiation of MSCs [34], whereas fibrin is a reparative biomolecule serving as a scaffold for tissue regeneration [35]. Further work is merited to define the characteristics of a biomaterial that would simultaneously capitalize on the osteogenic and proangiogenic potential of MSCspheroids.The pathways by which spheroids are able to enhance MSC function have yet to be fully elucidated, in part because of the complexity of the 3D microenvironment within the spheroid. Although many have explored the importance of cadherins on MSC spheroid formation and enhanced survival [17, 36, 37], this is the first study to show the importance of the cell-ECM interaction on the osteogenic commitment of MSCspheroids. Delivering MSCs as spheroids as opposed to the more commonly deployed dissociated cells avoids the deleterious trypsinization step, allowing the ECM to provide continued instruction via integrin-mediated cues. In addition to having a vast secretome [38], MSCs deposit a wide array of ECM proteins [39]. Here we show that MSCspheroids produce comparable levels of collagen type 1 compared with adherent monolayers on tissue culture plastic and that this production is further increased with the addition of osteogenic supplements. MSCs engage this ECM via integrins such as α2β1, a key mediator of cellular engagement with an underlying collagen matrix [16, 40]. We previously demonstrated that α2β1 signaling is the predominant integrin by which MSCs bind to their self-secreted ECM. Although other matrix components such as fibronectin, biglycan, and decorin are constitutively expressed, blocking of αvβ3 or α5β1 integrins does not affect cell adhesion [25]. However, it is most likely the complex milieu within the spheroid that strengthens their osteogenic commitment, because we recently demonstrated that collagen alone was unable to sustain osteoblastic phenotype following stimulus withdrawal [1]. Thus, the presence of fibronectin within the spheroid likely works in concert with the rich collagen matrix to instruct the MSCs to produce mineral.Entrapment of MSCs in collagen hydrogels provided a platform in which the spheroids and dissociated cells were exposed to the same mechanical cues. Within the collagen gel, dissociated MSCs benefit by being surrounded by collagen fibers that directly promote osteogenic differentiation, whereas only the cells on the outside of the spheroid are engaging the hydrogel. However, the potent cues provided by the ECM within the spheroids allow them to have greater osteogenic potential than do their dissociated counterparts. Although entrapment in the collagen hydrogels was sufficient to prevent the rapid dedifferentiation we reported in monolayer culture [1], dissociated MSCs entrapped in collagen hydrogels may use very low levels of α2β1 integrin binding, because blocking integrin activity had no effect on their osteogenic or proangiogenic potential. However, abrogation of α2β1 activity in MSCspheroids prevented their capacity to effectively engage their endogenous matrix, leading the MSCspheroids to secrete less calcium and more VEGF, both indicators of reduced osteogenic potential. Although there was a slight increase in ALP activity for both dissociated cells and spheroids when treated with an α2β1 antibody, this may be due to disruption of the temporal and cyclical ALP activity upon incubation with the antibody. Furthermore, throughout these studies we observed a general trend of VEGF secretion serving as a negative indicator of MSC osteodifferentiation. Although we have published extensively on this phenomenon [19, 21, 22], this is the first work to directly link VEGF secretion to α2β1 activity within MSCspheroids. Moreover, we focused on VEGF as a key secreted molecule to characterize angiogenic potential of spheroids. However, compensatory proteins/pathways may contribute to the angiogenic potential of these induced spheroids, the concentration and identity of which are functions of the differentiation state and the surrounding ECM [41]. The role of additional cytokines and potential synergistic contributions to bone formation merits examination.
Conclusion
Our results demonstrate that MSCs formed as spheroids sustain their osteoblastic phenotype better than do dissociated MSCs when encapsulated within a collagen hydrogel, yet this is at the expense of their proangiogenic potential. Furthermore, the capacity of MSCspheroids to sustain the osteoblastic phenotype is at least partially mediated by an α2β1 integrin-mediated mechanism.
Authors: Kaitlin C Murphy; Ben P Hung; Stephen Browne-Bourne; Dejie Zhou; Jessica Yeung; Damian C Genetos; J Kent Leach Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Silvia M Becerra-Bayona; Viviana R Guiza-Arguello; Brooke Russell; Magnus Höök; Mariah S Hahn Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2018-09-08 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Ben P Hung; Jenna N Harvestine; Augustine M Saiz; Tomas Gonzalez-Fernandez; David E Sahar; Mark L Weiss; J Kent Leach Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 12.479