Michael D Lewek1, Gregory S Sawicki2. 1. Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: mlewek@med.unc.edu. 2. George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering and School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0405, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Propulsive deficits following stroke have been attributed to reduced plantarflexion moments and a reduced trailing limb angle. We sought to determine the validity of the trailing limb angle as a surrogate measure of the anterior ground reaction force, as well as to determine the anatomical landmarks for the trailing limb angle that best approximate the orientation of the ground reaction force. METHODS: Forty-four participants with chronic stroke walked on a treadmill. At peak propulsion, we computed the trailing limb angle, the anterior orientation of the ground reaction force (the gold standard), and the hip extension angle for correlational analyses. Further, we compared the absolute error of the various trailing limb angle computations to determine which landmarks provided the most accurate representation of the anterior angle of the ground reaction force. FINDINGS: For the paretic and non-paretic limbs, the anterior angle of the ground reaction force was related to all measures of trailing limb angle as well as the peak propulsive force. The hip extension angle, however, was not related to the angle of the ground reaction force. Only the choice of distal landmarks significantly influenced the error between trailing limb angle and the anterior angle of the ground reaction force. INTERPRETATION: These data suggest that measuring the sagittal plane orientation of the entire limb serves as a suitable surrogate for measuring the anterior angle of the ground reaction force. Although greater errors were observed with kinematic measures of orientation, the magnitude of the error is likely within acceptable ranges.
BACKGROUND:Propulsive deficits following stroke have been attributed to reduced plantarflexion moments and a reduced trailing limb angle. We sought to determine the validity of the trailing limb angle as a surrogate measure of the anterior ground reaction force, as well as to determine the anatomical landmarks for the trailing limb angle that best approximate the orientation of the ground reaction force. METHODS: Forty-four participants with chronic stroke walked on a treadmill. At peak propulsion, we computed the trailing limb angle, the anterior orientation of the ground reaction force (the gold standard), and the hip extension angle for correlational analyses. Further, we compared the absolute error of the various trailing limb angle computations to determine which landmarks provided the most accurate representation of the anterior angle of the ground reaction force. FINDINGS: For the paretic and non-paretic limbs, the anterior angle of the ground reaction force was related to all measures of trailing limb angle as well as the peak propulsive force. The hip extension angle, however, was not related to the angle of the ground reaction force. Only the choice of distal landmarks significantly influenced the error between trailing limb angle and the anterior angle of the ground reaction force. INTERPRETATION: These data suggest that measuring the sagittal plane orientation of the entire limb serves as a suitable surrogate for measuring the anterior angle of the ground reaction force. Although greater errors were observed with kinematic measures of orientation, the magnitude of the error is likely within acceptable ranges.
Authors: Louis N Awad; Stuart A Binder-Macleod; Ryan T Pohlig; Darcy S Reisman Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2014-11-10 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Marius Steiro Fimland; Per Marius R Moen; Tessa Hill; Tor Ivar Gjellesvik; Tom Tørhaug; Jan Helgerud; Jan Hoff Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Emily M McCain; Matthew E Berno; Theresa L Libera; Michael D Lewek; Gregory S Sawicki; Katherine R Saul Journal: J Biomech Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: Dheepak Arumukhom Revi; Andre M Alvarez; Conor J Walsh; Stefano M M De Rossi; Louis N Awad Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 4.262