Literature DB >> 2121086

Ten years of experience with the Swedish bone-anchored hearing system.

B Håkansson1, G Lidén, A Tjellström, A Ringdahl, M Jacobsson, P Carlsson, B E Erlandson.   

Abstract

In 1977, a new phase began in hearing rehabilitation of patients with chronic middle and external diseases and atresias. Thus far, these patients have had to rely on conventional bone conduction and air conduction devices that for various reasons give poor rehabilitation. The principle of the new treatment, made possible by the Swedish bone-anchored hearing system, is simple: sound vibrations are directly transmitted to the skull bone via a skin-penetrating titanium implant and then are further transmitted to the cochlea, bypassing the middle ear. The present paper summarizes our results in 147 patients over 10 years, including a total of 6,334 follow-up months. No significant rate of skin infections was observed. In over 93% of the observations, no sign of adverse skin reaction was seen. When herein-suggested indications for treatment with the bone-anchored sound processor HC-200 are followed, the success rate is over 90%. The improved quality of life reported by the patients is a combination of improved quality of sound, improved comfort, and relief from middle ear and ear canal disease occasioned by conventional hearing aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2121086     DOI: 10.1177/0003489490099s1001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl        ISSN: 0096-8056


  12 in total

1.  BAHA: Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Hagr
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2007-07

2.  Current trends in implantable hearing AIDS.

Authors:  M Chasin
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1997-09

Review 3.  Cancer of the external auditory canal and temporal bone.

Authors:  Randall L Breau; Edward K Gardner; John L Dornhoffer
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Békésy's contributions to our present understanding of sound conduction to the inner ear.

Authors:  Sunil Puria; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Bone anchored hearing aid: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2002-09-01

6.  Outcomes of Bone Anchored Hearing Aid Implant at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC).

Authors:  Suhana Abdul Rahim; Bee-See Goh; Safinaz Zainor; Roslenda Abdul Rahman; Asma Abdullah
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-09-12

7.  Preoperative computed tomography in patients requiring a bone-anchored hearing aid.

Authors:  J W Casselman; B Ars; P Van de Heyning; E Koekelkoren
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Predisposing factors for adverse skin reactions with percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices implanted with skin reduction techniques.

Authors:  Claudia Candreia; Ruth Birrer; Susanna Fistarol; Martin Kompis; Marco Caversaccio; Andreas Arnold; Christof Stieger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Speech understanding with a new implant technology: a comparative study with a new nonskin penetrating Baha system.

Authors:  Anja Kurz; Mark Flynn; Marco Caversaccio; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Speech Understanding and Sound Localization with a New Nonimplantable Wearing Option for Baha.

Authors:  Tom Gawliczek; Wilhelm Wimmer; Fabio Munzinger; Marco Caversaccio; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.