Literature DB >> 3889747

Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length.

C P Weiner, R E Sabbagha, N Vaisrub, M L Socol.   

Abstract

The accurate sonographic estimate of fetal weight is helpful in those instances when the fetal weight estimate might alter clinical management. Most sonographic weight predicting formulas have been based predominantly on measurements from the term fetus and then applied to the preterm fetus. Yet, the morphology of the preterm and term fetus differs considerably. The authors have examined the predictive accuracy of three published sonographic formulas in 69 preterm fetuses scanned within 48 hours of delivery. The mean birth weight was 1396 g. Thirty-nine of the infants were less than 1500 g. Sixty-two percent were products of pregnancies complicated by premature rupture of membranes. The results were compared with new equations derived from combinations of head and abdominal circumferences, biparietal diameter, and femur length obtained from the first 33 fetuses and then tested on the remaining 36. Whereas each formula correlated highly with birth weight, the selected new formula was more accurate than the published formulas by each criteria examined. In contrast to the latter, the mean error (actual minus predicted weight) of most new equations did not significantly differ from zero when tested prospectively. In addition, it appeared that the accuracy of two new formulas not incorporating femur length could be further enhanced in the group of fetuses whose femur length differed from the mean by at least 2 standard deviations by multiplying the predicted weight by the ratio of actual to mean femur length. The authors conclude that the use of head circumference and femur length coupled with a population restricted to the preterm fetus enhances the accuracy of sonographic weight predictions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3889747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of Errors of 35 Weight Estimation Formulae in a Standard Collective.

Authors:  M Hoopmann; K O Kagan; A Sauter; H Abele; P Wagner
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  The accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in comparison to birth weight: A systematic review.

Authors:  Julia Milner; Jane Arezina
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2018-02-07

3.  Fetal Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Models: Systems Information on Fetal Biometry and Gross Composition.

Authors:  Khaled Abduljalil; Trevor N Johnson; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Reference values of fetal ultrasound biometry: results of a prospective cohort study in Lithuania.

Authors:  Bronius Žaliūnas; Vaidilė Jakaitė; Juozas Kurmanavičius; Daiva Bartkevičienė; Kristina Norvilaitė; Karolina Passerini
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  A modified prenatal growth assessment score for the evaluation of fetal growth in the third trimester using single and composite biometric parameters.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Adi L Tarca; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-07-11

6.  Fetal biometry for guiding the medical management of women with gestational diabetes mellitus for improving maternal and perinatal health.

Authors:  Ujvala Rao; Bradley de Vries; Glynis P Ross; Adrienne Gordon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-03

7.  Anterior Superior Iliac Spine to the Tibial Tuberosity Length: An Easier, Accurate, and Faster Method for Predicting Orogastric Tube Length in Neonates-An Observational Study.

Authors:  Samarendra Mahapatro; Satish Mohanty; Sandeep Kumar Panigrahi; Rajib Kumar Ray; Shruti Saraswat
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2017-03-30

8.  Sonographic fetal weight estimation using femoral length: Honarvar equation.

Authors:  Raziah Dehghani Firoozabadi; Nasrin Ghasemi; Mehdi Dehghani Firoozabadi
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.526

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.