Literature DB >> 29456577

Is ultrasound screening for vasa praevia clinically justified and a financially viable screening test? A literature review.

Gillian Coleman1,2, Heather Venables1.   

Abstract

Vasa praevia is an obstetric complication currently not screened for within the United Kingdom, which if undetected prenatally can lead to fetal death when the membranes rupture. Internationally, guidelines are available providing guidance on the best screening policy and management pathways. However, the UK National Screening Committee and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists do not support screening due to a lack of evidence. Recent studies explore the ability of ultrasound to detect vasa praevia prenatally in both the general and high-risk populations. Whilst there is no consensus on the 'best' screening strategy, the majority of authors note that targeted screening of the high-risk population is the most achievable and cost-effective strategy. Although not infallible, a standard screening protocol could identify the majority of cases in the high-risk group. Introduction of a screening strategy would affect training needs of professionals within the UK and would have implications on the need to produce guidelines on management and quality assurance. Further research is also needed to define a relevant high-risk population and explore how this would impact on service provision. This review explores the current evidence base for systematic screening and the implications for service.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vasa praevia; antepartum haemorrhage; bilobed placenta; screening; ultrasound; velamentous cord insertion

Year:  2018        PMID: 29456577      PMCID: PMC5810858          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X17747139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  18 in total

1.  Prenatal detection of velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord: a prospective color Doppler ultrasound study.

Authors:  W Sepulveda; I Rojas; J A Robert; C Schnapp; J L Alcalde
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 2.  Is it time to actively look for vasa praevia?

Authors:  A Nishtar; P L Wood
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  The association between vasa previa, multiple gestations, and assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Manisha Gandhi; Jane Cleary-Goldman; Lauren Ferrara; Doina Ciorica; Daniel Saltzman; Andrei Rebarber
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Natural history of vasa previa across gestation using a screening protocol.

Authors:  Andrei Rebarber; Cara Dolin; Nathan S Fox; Chad K Klauser; Daniel H Saltzman; Ashley S Roman
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Diagnosis and management of vasa previa: a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  C Ioannou; C Wayne
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of vasa previa: ultrasound findings and obstetric outcome in ten cases.

Authors:  V Catanzarite; C Maida; W Thomas; A Mendoza; L Stanco; K M Piacquadio
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 7.  Systematic review of accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of vasa previa.

Authors:  L Ruiter; N Kok; J Limpens; J B Derks; I M de Graaf; B W J Mol; E Pajkrt
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 7.299

8.  Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes.

Authors:  Yinka Oyelese; Val Catanzarite; Federico Prefumo; Susan Lashley; Morey Schachter; Yosi Tovbin; Victoria Goldstein; John C Smulian
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Vasa Praevia: a descriptive review of existing literature and the evolving role of ultrasound in prenatal screening.

Authors:  Natasha Donnolley; Lesley E Halliday; Yinka Oyelese
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

10.  Prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of velamentous and marginal cord insertions: a population-based study of 634,741 pregnancies.

Authors:  Cathrine Ebbing; Torvid Kiserud; Synnøve Lian Johnsen; Susanne Albrechtsen; Svein Rasmussen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.