Literature DB >> 24371109

Natural history of vasa previa across gestation using a screening protocol.

Andrei Rebarber1, Cara Dolin, Nathan S Fox, Chad K Klauser, Daniel H Saltzman, Ashley S Roman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence and persistence rate of vasa previa in at-risk pregnancies using a standardized screening protocol.
METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study of patients with a diagnosis of vasa previa from a single ultrasound unit between June 2005 and June 2012. Vasa previa was defined as a fetal vessel within 2 cm of the internal cervical os on transvaginal sonography. Screening for vasa previa using transvaginal sonography with color flow mapping was performed routinely in the following situations: resolved placenta previa, prior pregnancy with vasa previa, velamentous insertion of the cord in the lower uterine segment, placenta succenturiata in the lower uterine segment, and twin gestations.
RESULTS: A total of 27,573 patients were referred to our unit for fetal anatomic surveys over the study period. Thirty-one cases of vasa previa were identified, for an incidence of 1.1 per 1000 pregnancies. Twenty-nine cases had full records available for analysis. Five patients (17.2%) had migration and resolution of the vasa previa. When the diagnosis was made during the second trimester (<26 weeks), there was a 23.8% resolution rate (5 of 21); when the diagnosis was made in the third trimester, none resolved (0 of 8 cases). Of the 24 pregnancies (5 twin gestations and 19 singleton gestations) with persistent vasa previa, there was 100% perinatal survival and a median length of gestation of 35 weeks (range, 27 weeks 5 days-36 weeks 5 days). No known missed cases were identified over the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of standardized screening for vasa previa based on focused criteria was found to be effective in diagnosing vasa previa, with a 100% survival rate. Vasa previa diagnosed during the second trimester resolves in approximately 25% of cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  obstetric ultrasound; prenatal diagnosis; vasa previa migration; vasa previa screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24371109     DOI: 10.7863/ultra.33.1.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  6 in total

Review 1.  Sonographic Assessment of the Umbilical Cord.

Authors:  S Bosselmann; G Mielke
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Antenatal diagnosis of vasa previa: report of three cases in an African setting.

Authors:  Yaw Amo Wiafe; Theophilus Kofi Adu-Bredu; Kwame Appiah-Denkyira; Charles Mawunyo Senaya
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-09-07

Review 3.  Is ultrasound screening for vasa praevia clinically justified and a financially viable screening test? A literature review.

Authors:  Gillian Coleman; Heather Venables
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2018-02-07

Review 4.  Velamentous cord insertion: results from a rapid review of incidence, risk factors, adverse outcomes and screening.

Authors:  Amy Buchanan-Hughes; Anna Bobrowska; Cristina Visintin; George Attilakos; John Marshall
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-23

5.  "Wrapping myself in cotton wool": Australian women's experience of being diagnosed with vasa praevia.

Authors:  Nasrin Javid; Elizabeth A Sullivan; Lesley E Halliday; Greg Duncombe; Caroline S E Homer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa and the course of the cord vessels contribute to the safety of cesarean sections: A case report.

Authors:  Mihoko Aoki; Soichiro Obata; Mizuha Odagami; Etsuko Miyagi; Shigeru Aoki
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2019-09-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.