Literature DB >> 20014327

Diagnosis and management of vasa previa: a questionnaire survey.

C Ioannou1, C Wayne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to assess the current use of obstetric ultrasound imaging for the diagnosis of asymptomatic vasa previa. We also investigated obstetricians' views on the feasibility of a screening policy and their awareness of risk factors associated with this condition.
METHODS: A national postal survey was conducted between March and July 2006. A total of 234 questionnaires were sent to obstetric and fetomaternal consultants across England and Wales. In all, 128 questionnaires were returned, a response rate of 55%.
RESULTS: Most respondents (85%) stated that in their hospital they do not report velamentous cord insertions at the anomaly scan. However, 73% occasionally or routinely document the presence of succenturiate lobes. Only 33% of respondents offered transvaginal scanning for the identification of vasa previa within their hospital, whereas only 6% had ever referred women to a tertiary center for this indication. In all, 34% of the respondents did not identify any risk factor for the condition. Most respondents (80%) would offer an elective Cesarean section if vasa previa was suspected antenatally; the majority would perform it at 38 weeks' gestation. However, only 20% of respondents felt that an effective screening policy is possible.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite evidence that perinatal death can be prevented by antenatal diagnosis of vasa previa, most obstetricians in England and Wales feel that a screening policy is not possible. The majority of them would offer an elective Cesarean section for vasa previa at around 38 weeks. There is a need to increase awareness and understanding of the major risk factors for this condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20014327     DOI: 10.1002/uog.7466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  6 in total

Review 1.  Is ultrasound screening for vasa praevia clinically justified and a financially viable screening test? A literature review.

Authors:  Gillian Coleman; Heather Venables
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2018-02-07

Review 2.  Vasa Praevia: a descriptive review of existing literature and the evolving role of ultrasound in prenatal screening.

Authors:  Natasha Donnolley; Lesley E Halliday; Yinka Oyelese
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

Review 3.  Velamentous cord insertion: results from a rapid review of incidence, risk factors, adverse outcomes and screening.

Authors:  Amy Buchanan-Hughes; Anna Bobrowska; Cristina Visintin; George Attilakos; John Marshall
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-23

4.  Vasa previa: A rare obstetric complication-A case series and a literature review.

Authors:  Yaman Degirmenci; Joscha Steetskamp; Doris Macchiella; Annbalou Hasenburg; Annette Hasenburg
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-22

5.  Velamentous cord insertion in a singleton pregnancy: an obscure cause of emergency cesarean-a case report.

Authors:  Juliana Rocha; Joana Carvalho; Fernanda Costa; Isabel Meireles; Olímpia do Carmo
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-29

6.  "Wrapping myself in cotton wool": Australian women's experience of being diagnosed with vasa praevia.

Authors:  Nasrin Javid; Elizabeth A Sullivan; Lesley E Halliday; Greg Duncombe; Caroline S E Homer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.