Literature DB >> 29453729

Perioperative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy with mini-laparotomy versus open hysterectomy for uterus weighing more than 250 g.

Natasha Gupta1,2, Shanti Mohling3, Rebecca Mckendrick3,4, Rayan Elkattah3, Jenny Holcombe3,4, Robert S Furr3, Todd Boren4, Stephen DePasquale4.   

Abstract

To compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy and extraction of specimen via mini-laparotomy (RHML) versus open hysterectomy (OH) when uterus weighs more than 250 g. To study the factors determining the length of hospital stay in 2 groups. A retrospective analysis of all hysterectomies performed for uterus weighing more than 250 g from the year 2012 to 2015 was conducted. A total of 140 patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of surgery; RHML (n = 82) and OH (n = 58). Mini-laparotomy consisted of a customised incision connecting 2 left lateral port sites for specimen extraction after completing the hysterectomy robotically. Patient factors and perioperative outcomes were compared using Student's t tests and Chi-square analysis. Mean length of stay (RHML = 1.4 days; OH = 3.4 days), estimated blood loss (EBL) (RHML = 119.9 ml; OH = 547.5 ml) and operative time (RHML = 191.5 min; OH = 162.8 min) were significantly different. No significant differences were noted for patient BMI, age, comorbidities, intraoperative complications, pathology of uterus and uterus weight. Postoperative complications were significantly different between two groups (RHML = 6.0%; OH = 15.5%; p = .021). None of the patients stayed less than 24 h in OH group compared to 59.8% patients in RHML group. Type of procedure (p = .004) and EBL (p = .002) significantly predicted the length of stay. Patients undergoing RHML have significantly shorter length of stay, EBL and postoperative complications than OH. The operative time for RHML was longer than OH, but the overall decreased length of stay overcomes this disadvantage. RHML approach retains the benefits of da Vinci, while simultaneously preserving the specimen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hysterectomy; Large uteri; Mini-laparotomy; Morcellation; Robotic surgery; Specimen removal

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29453729     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0792-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  24 in total

1.  Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Karim S ElSahwi; Charlene Hooper; Maria C De Leon; Taryn N Gallo; Elena Ratner; Dan-Arin Silasi; Alessandro D Santin; Peter E Schwartz; Thomas J Rutherford; Masoud Azodi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Association of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Morcellation Warning With Rates of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Barron; Tere Richard; Patricia S Robinson; Georgine Lamvu
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Arnold P Advincula; Karen Wang
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 4.  Robotic surgery in gynecology.

Authors:  R W Holloway; S D Patel; S Ahmad
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.360

5.  Minilaparotomy myomectomy: a minimally invasive alternative for the large fibroid uterus.

Authors:  Mark H Glasser
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Surgery by minilaparotomy in benign gynecologic disease.

Authors:  P Benedetti-Panici; F Maneschi; G Cutillo; G Scambia; M Congiu; S Mancuso
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Uterine morcellation at the time of hysterectomy: techniques, risks, and recommendations.

Authors:  Jessica E Stine; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.347

8.  Guidelines to determine the route of oophorectomy with hysterectomy.

Authors:  S R Kovac; S H Cruikshank
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Resad P Pasic; John A Rizzo; Hai Fang; Susan Ross; Matt Moore; Candace Gunnarsson
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.137

10.  Perioperative outcomes of robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign cases with complex pathology.

Authors:  John F Boggess; Paola A Gehrig; Leigh Cantrell; Aaron Shafer; Alberto Mendivil; Emma Rossi; Rabbie Hanna
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.