Literature DB >> 19423061

Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Arnold P Advincula1, Karen Wang.   

Abstract

Advancements in conventional laparoscopy afford gynecologists the ability to treat disease with minimally invasive interventions. Procedures such as hysterectomy are still performed predominantly via laparotomy. Instrumentation, complex disease, and steep learning curves are often cited as obstacles to minimally invasive surgery. The advent of robotic technology may provide a means to overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopy through the use of 3-dimensional imaging and more dextrous and precise instruments. Current studies clearly demonstrate the feasibility and safety of applying robotics to the entire spectrum of gynecologic procedures. Rigorous scientific studies and long-term data are needed to determine the appropriate applications of robotics in gynecology. Numerous questions still exist pertaining to costs, credentialing and privileging, and training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19423061     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  23 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Benjamin B Albright; Tilman Witte; Alena N Tofte; Jeremy Chou; Jonathan D Black; Vrunda B Desai; Elisabeth A Erekson
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 4.137

2.  Developing a robotic program in thoracic surgery at Cape Cod Hospital.

Authors:  Jeffrey Spillane; Paula Brooks
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-02-26

3.  Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights.

Authors:  Gaby N Moawad; Elias D Abi Khalil; Paul Tyan; Michael K Shu; David Samuel; Richard Amdur; Stacey A Scheib; Cherie Q Marfori
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-01-31

4.  Parallel side-docking technique for gynecologic procedures utilizing the da Vinci robot.

Authors:  Suzanne Silverman; Laurence Orbuch; Iris Orbuch
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-03-13

5.  Robotic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) hysterectomy as a scarless and gasless surgery.

Authors:  Yun Seok Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-12-01

7.  Perioperative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy with mini-laparotomy versus open hysterectomy for uterus weighing more than 250 g.

Authors:  Natasha Gupta; Shanti Mohling; Rebecca Mckendrick; Rayan Elkattah; Jenny Holcombe; Robert S Furr; Todd Boren; Stephen DePasquale
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-02-16

8.  Robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy for very large uteri.

Authors:  Dan-Arin Silasi; Taryn Gallo; Michelle Silasi; Gulden Menderes; Masoud Azodi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Determinants of Surgical Approach and Survival Among Women with Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Kristin Bixel; David A Barrington; Monica H Vetter; Adrian A Suarez; Ashley S Felix
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.137

10.  Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches.

Authors:  Mona Orady; Alexander Hrynewych; A Karim Nawfal; Ganesa Wegienka
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.